
I broke this in commit3de96471bd
: [TCP]: Wrap-safed reordering detection FRTO check tcp_process_frto should always see a valid frto_highmark. An invalid frto_highmark (zero) is very likely what ultimately caused a seqno compare in tcp_frto_enter_loss to do the wrong leading to the LOST-bit leak. Having LOST-bits integry ensured like done after commit23aeeec365
: [TCP] FRTO: Plug potential LOST-bit leak won't hurt. It may still be useful in some other, possibly legimate, scenario. Reported by Chazarain Guillaume <guichaz@yahoo.fr>. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
149 KiB
149 KiB