
Directories are only updated transactionally, which means fsync only needs to flush the log the inode is currently dirty, but not bother with checking for dirty data, non-transactional updates, and most importanly doesn't have to flush disk caches except as part of a transaction commit. While the first two optimizations can't easily be measured, the latter actually makes a difference when doing lots of fsync that do not actually have to commit the inode, e.g. because an earlier fsync already pushed the log far enough. The new xfs_dir_fsync is identical to xfs_nfs_commit_metadata except for the prototype, but I'm not sure creating a common helper for the two is worth it given how simple the functions are. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
31 KiB
31 KiB