9b69cdb6e5
[ Upstream commit d3f87278bcb80bd7f9519669d928b43320363d4f ]
The kernel does not currently validate that both the minimum and maximum
ports of a port range are specified. This can lead user space to think
that a filter matching on a port range was successfully added, when in
fact it was not. For example, with a patched (buggy) iproute2 that only
sends the minimum port, the following commands do not return an error:
# tc filter add dev swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip flower ip_proto udp src_port 100-200 action pass
# tc filter add dev swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip flower ip_proto udp dst_port 100-200 action pass
# tc filter show dev swp1 ingress
filter protocol ip pref 1 flower chain 0
filter protocol ip pref 1 flower chain 0 handle 0x1
eth_type ipv4
ip_proto udp
not_in_hw
action order 1: gact action pass
random type none pass val 0
index 1 ref 1 bind 1
filter protocol ip pref 1 flower chain 0 handle 0x2
eth_type ipv4
ip_proto udp
not_in_hw
action order 1: gact action pass
random type none pass val 0
index 2 ref 1 bind 1
Fix by returning an error unless both ports are specified:
# tc filter add dev swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip flower ip_proto udp src_port 100-200 action pass
Error: Both min and max source ports must be specified.
We have an error talking to the kernel
# tc filter add dev swp1 ingress pref 1 proto ip flower ip_proto udp dst_port 100-200 action pass
Error: Both min and max destination ports must be specified.
We have an error talking to the kernel
Fixes: 5c72299fba ("net: sched: cls_flower: Classify packets using port ranges")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
92 KiB
92 KiB