
Change-recording override (CO) was never implemented in any machine. According to the architecture it is unpredictable if a translation-specification exception will be recognized if the bit is set and EDAT1 does not apply. Therefore the easiest solution is to simply ignore the bit. This also fixes commitcd1836f583
("KVM: s390: instruction-execution-protection support"). A guest may enable instruction-execution-protection (IEP) but not EDAT1. In such a case the guest_translate() function (arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c) will report a specification exception on pages that have the IEP bit set while it should not. It might make sense to add full IEP support to guest_translate() and the GACC_IFETCH case. However, as far as I can tell the GACC_IFETCH case is currently only used after an instruction was executed in order to fetch the failing instruction. So there is no additional problem *currently*. Fixes:cd1836f583
("KVM: s390: instruction-execution-protection support") Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
31 KiB
31 KiB