Currently __set_oom_adj loops through all processes in the system to keep
oom_score_adj and oom_score_adj_min in sync between processes sharing
their mm. This is done for any task with more that one mm_users, which
includes processes with multiple threads (sharing mm and signals).
However for such processes the loop is unnecessary because their signal
structure is shared as well.
Android updates oom_score_adj whenever a tasks changes its role
(background/foreground/...) or binds to/unbinds from a service, making it
more/less important. Such operation can happen frequently. We noticed
that updates to oom_score_adj became more expensive and after further
investigation found out that the patch mentioned in "Fixes" introduced a
regression. Using Pixel 4 with a typical Android workload, write time to
oom_score_adj increased from ~3.57us to ~362us. Moreover this regression
linearly depends on the number of multi-threaded processes running on the
system.
Mark the mm with a new MMF_MULTIPROCESS flag bit when task is created with
(CLONE_VM && !CLONE_THREAD && !CLONE_VFORK). Change __set_oom_adj to use
MMF_MULTIPROCESS instead of mm_users to decide whether oom_score_adj
update should be synchronized between multiple processes. To prevent
races between clone() and __set_oom_adj(), when oom_score_adj of the
process being cloned might be modified from userspace, we use
oom_adj_mutex. Its scope is changed to global.
The combination of (CLONE_VM && !CLONE_THREAD) is rarely used except for
the case of vfork(). To prevent performance regressions of vfork(), we
skip taking oom_adj_mutex and setting MMF_MULTIPROCESS when CLONE_VFORK is
specified. Clearing the MMF_MULTIPROCESS flag (when the last process
sharing the mm exits) is left out of this patch to keep it simple and
because it is believed that this threading model is rare. Should there
ever be a need for optimizing that case as well, it can be done by hooking
into the exit path, likely following the mm_update_next_owner pattern.
With the combination of (CLONE_VM && !CLONE_THREAD && !CLONE_VFORK) being
quite rare, the regression is gone after the change is applied.
[surenb@google.com: v3]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200902012558.2335613-1-surenb@google.com
Fixes: 44a70adec9 ("mm, oom_adj: make sure processes sharing mm have same view of oom_score_adj")
Reported-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Kellner <christian@kellner.me>
Cc: Adrian Reber <areber@redhat.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Cc: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Cc: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824153036.3201505-1-surenb@google.com
Debugged-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The only user of memblock_dbg() outside memblock was s390 setup code and
it is converted to use pr_debug() instead. This allows to stop exposing
memblock_debug and memblock_dbg() to the rest of the kernel.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: make memblock_dbg() safer and neater]
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-10-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Add else to split mutually exclusive case and avoid some unnecessary check.
It doesn't seem to change code generation (compiler is smart), but I think
it helps readability.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment location]
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200924111641.28922-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
We have observed that drop_caches can take a considerable amount of
time (<put data here>). Especially when there are many memcgs involved
because they are adding an additional overhead.
It is quite unfortunate that the operation cannot be interrupted by a
signal currently. Add a check for fatal signals into the main loop so
that userspace can control early bailout.
There are two reasons:
1. We have too many memcgs, even though one object freed in one memcg,
the sum of object is bigger than 10.
2. We spend a lot of time in traverse memcg once. So, the memcg who
traversed at the first have been freed many objects. Traverse memcg
next time, the freed count bigger than 10 again.
We can get the following info through 'ps':
root:~# ps -aux | grep drop
root 357956 ... R Aug25 21119854:55 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 1771385 ... R Aug16 21146421:17 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 1986319 ... R 18:56 117:27 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 2002148 ... R Aug24 5720:39 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 2564666 ... R 18:59 113:58 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 2639347 ... R Sep03 2383:39 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 3904747 ... R 03:35 993:31 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
root 4016780 ... R Aug21 7882:18 echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
Use bpftrace follow 'freed' value in drop_slab_node:
root:~# bpftrace -e 'kprobe:drop_slab_node+70 {@ret=hist(reg("bp")); }'
Attaching 1 probe...
^B^C
@ret:
[64, 128) 1 | |
[128, 256) 28 | |
[256, 512) 107 |@ |
[512, 1K) 298 |@@@ |
[1K, 2K) 613 |@@@@@@@ |
[2K, 4K) 4435 |@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@|
[4K, 8K) 442 |@@@@@ |
[8K, 16K) 299 |@@@ |
[16K, 32K) 100 |@ |
[32K, 64K) 139 |@ |
[64K, 128K) 56 | |
[128K, 256K) 26 | |
[256K, 512K) 2 | |
In the while loop, we can check whether the TASK_KILLABLE signal is set,
if so, we should break the loop.
Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <zangchunxin@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200909152047.27905-1-zangchunxin@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If a swap entry tests positive for either is_[migration|hwpoison]_entry(),
then its swap_type() is among SWP_MIGRATION_READ, SWP_MIGRATION_WRITE and
SWP_HWPOISON. All these types >= MAX_SWAPFILES, exactly what is asserted
with non_swap_entry().
So the checking non_swap_entry() in is_hugetlb_entry_migration() and
is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned() is redundant.
Let's remove it to optimize code.
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200723032248.24772-3-bhe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Here is a very rare race which leaks memory:
Page P0 is allocated to the page cache. Page P1 is free.
Thread A Thread B Thread C
find_get_entry():
xas_load() returns P0
Removes P0 from page cache
P0 finds its buddy P1
alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 1) returns P0
P0 has refcount 1
page_cache_get_speculative(P0)
P0 has refcount 2
__free_pages(P0)
P0 has refcount 1
put_page(P0)
P1 is not freed
Fix this by freeing all the pages in __free_pages() that won't be freed
by the call to put_page(). It's usually not a good idea to split a page,
but this is a very unlikely scenario.
Fixes: e286781d5f ("mm: speculative page references")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200926213919.26642-1-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The function is_huge_zero_page() doesn't call compound_head() to make sure
the page pointer is a head page. The call to is_huge_zero_page() in
release_pages() is made before compound_head() is called so the test would
fail if release_pages() was called with a tail page of the huge_zero_page
and put_page_testzero() would be called releasing the page.
This is unlikely to be happening in normal use or we would be seeing all
sorts of process data corruption when accessing a THP zero page.
Looking at other places where is_huge_zero_page() is called, all seem to
only pass a head page so I think the right solution is to move the call
to compound_head() in release_pages() to a point before calling
is_huge_zero_page().
Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200917173938.16420-1-rcampbell@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Previously variable 'tmp' was initialized, but was not read later before
reassigning. So the initialization can be removed.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove `tmp' altogether]
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200904132422.17387-1-mateusznosek0@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In has_unmovable_pages(), the page parameter would not always be the first
page within a pageblock (see how the page pointer is passed in from
start_isolate_page_range() after call __first_valid_page()), so that would
cause checking unmovable pages span two pageblocks.
After this patch, the checking is enforced within one pageblock no matter
the page is first one or not, and obey the semantics of this function.
This issue is found by code inspection.
Michal said "this might lead to false negatives when an unrelated block
would cause an isolation failure".
Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824065811.383266-1-lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Inside has_unmovable_pages(), we have a comment describing how unmovable
data could end up in ZONE_MOVABLE - via "movablecore". Also, besides
checking if the first page in the pageblock is reserved, we don't perform
any further checks in case of ZONE_MOVABLE.
In case of memory offlining, we set REPORT_FAILURE, properly dump_page()
the page and handle the error gracefully. alloc_contig_pages() users
currently never allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE. E.g., hugetlb uses
alloc_contig_pages() for the allocation of gigantic pages only, which will
never end up on the MOVABLE zone (see htlb_alloc_mask()).
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-4-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE", v5.
When introducing virtio-mem, the semantics of ZONE_MOVABLE were rather
unclear, which is why we special-cased ZONE_MOVABLE such that partially
plugged blocks would never end up in ZONE_MOVABLE.
Now that the semantics are much clearer (and are documented in patch #6),
let's support partially plugged memory blocks in ZONE_MOVABLE, allowing
partially plugged memory blocks to be online to ZONE_MOVABLE and also
unplugging from such memory blocks. This avoids surprises when onlining
of memory blocks suddenly fails, just because they are not completely
populated by virtio-mem (yet).
This is especially helpful for testing, but also paves the way for
virtio-mem optimizations, allowing more memory to get reliably unplugged.
Cleanup has_unmovable_pages() and set_migratetype_isolate(), providing
better documentation of how ZONE_MOVABLE interacts with different kind of
unmovable pages (memory offlining vs. alloc_contig_range()).
This patch (of 6):
Let's move the split comment regarding bootmem allocations and memory
holes, especially in the context of ZONE_MOVABLE, to the PageReserved()
check.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-1-david@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-2-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
