This new parameter let's the application choose how often the OA
buffer should be checked on the CPU side for data availability. Longer
polling period tend to reduce CPU overhead if the application does not
care about somewhat real time data collection.
v2: Allow disabling polling completely with 0 value (Lionel)
v3: Version the new parameter (Joonas)
v4: Rebase (Umesh)
v5: Make poll delay value of 0 invalid (Umesh)
v6:
- Describe poll_oa_period (Ashutosh)
- Fix comment for new poll parameter (Lionel)
- Drop open_flags in read_properties_unlocked (Lionel)
- Rename uapi parameter (Ashutosh)
v7: Reword the comment in uapi (Ashutosh)
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200324185457.14635-4-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
We're about to introduce an options to open the perf stream, giving
the user ability to configure how often it wants the kernel to poll
the OA registers for available data.
Right now the workaround against the OA tail pointer race condition
requires at least twice the internal kernel polling timer to make any
data available.
This changes introduce checks on the OA data written into the circular
buffer to make as much data as possible available on the first
iteration of the polling timer.
v2: Use OA_TAKEN macro without the gtt_offset (Lionel)
v3: (Umesh)
- Rebase
- Change report to report32 from below review
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/330704/?series=66697&rev=1
v4: (Ashutosh, Lionel)
- Fix checkpatch errors
- Fix aging_timestamp initialization
- Check for only one valid landed report
- Fix check for unlanded report
v5: (Ashutosh)
- Fix bug in accurately determining landed report.
- Optimize the check for landed reports by going as far as the
previously determined aged tail.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200324185457.14635-2-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com
A recent commit in clang added -Wtautological-compare to -Wall, which is
enabled for i915 after -Wtautological-compare is disabled for the rest
of the kernel so we see the following warning on x86_64:
../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:1433:22: warning:
result of comparison of constant 576460752303423487 with expression of
type 'unsigned int' is always false
[-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
if (unlikely(remain > N_RELOC(ULONG_MAX)))
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: expanded from macro 'unlikely'
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^
1 warning generated.
It is not wrong in the case where ULONG_MAX > UINT_MAX but it does not
account for the case where this file is built for 32-bit x86, where
ULONG_MAX == UINT_MAX and this check is still relevant.
Cast remain to unsigned long, which keeps the generated code the same
(verified with clang-11 on x86_64 and GCC 9.2.0 on x86 and x86_64) and
the warning is silenced so we can catch more potential issues in the
future.
Closes: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/778
Suggested-by: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200214054706.33870-1-natechancellor@gmail.com
We currently initialize HuC support based on GuC being enabled in
modparam; this means that huc_is_supported() can return false on HW that
does have a HuC when enable_guc=0. The rationale for this behavior is
that HuC requires GuC for authentication and therefore is not supported
by itself. However, we do not allow defining HuC fw wthout GuC fw and
selecting HuC in modparam implicitly selects GuC as well, so we can't
actually hit a scenario where HuC is selected alone. Therefore, we can
flip the support check to reflect the HW capabilities and fw
availability, which is more intuitive and will make it cleaner to log
HuC the difference between not supported in HW and not selected.
Removing the difference between GuC and HuC also allows us to simplify
the init_early, since we don't need to differentiate the support based
on the type of uC.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
When registering debugfs files the intel gt debugfs library
forces a 'struct *gt' private data on the caller.
To be open to different usages make the new
"intel_gt_debugfs_register_files()"[*] function more generic by
converting the 'struct *gt' pointer to a 'void *' type.
I take the chance to rename the functions by using "intel_gt_" as
prefix instead of "debugfs_", so that "debugfs_gt_register_files()"
becomes "intel_gt_debugfs_register_files()".
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200326181121.16869-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
If the caller allows and we do not have to wait for any signals,
immediately execute the work within the caller's process. By doing so we
avoid the overhead of scheduling a new task, and the latency in
executing it, at the cost of pulling that work back into the immediate
context. (Sometimes we still prefer to offload the task to another cpu,
especially if we plan on executing many such tasks in parallel for this
client.)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200325120227.8044-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We dropped calling process_csb prior to handling direct submission in
order to avoid the nesting of spinlocks and lift process_csb() and the
majority of the tasklet out of irq-off. However, we do want to avoid
ksoftirqd latency in the fast path, so try and pull the interrupt-bh
local to direct submission if we can acquire the tasklet's lock.
v2: Document the read of pending[0] from outside the tasklet with
READ_ONCE.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200325120227.8044-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We set the priority hint on execlists to avoid executing the tasklet for
when we know that there will be no change in execution order. However,
as we set it from the virtual engine for all siblings, but only one
physical engine may respond, we leave the hint set on the others
stopping direct submission that could take place.
If we do not set the hint, we may attempt direct submission even if we
don't expect to submit. If we set the hint, we may not do any submission
until the tasklet is run (and sometimes we may park the engine before
that has had a chance). Ergo there's only a minor ill-effect on mixed
virtual/physical engine workloads where we may try and fail to do direct
submission more often than required. (Pure virtual / engine workloads
will have redundant tasklet execution suppressed as normal.)
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1522
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200325101358.12231-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
dGFX has local memory so it does not have aperture or support
CPU fences but even for iGFX it have a small number of fences.
As replacement for fences to track frontbuffer modifications by CPU
we have a software tracking that is already in used by FBC and PSR.
PSR don't support fences so it shows that this tracking is reliable.
So lets make fences a nice-to-have to activate FBC for GEN9+, this
will allow us to enable FBC for dGFXs and iGFXs even when there is no
available fence.
We do not set fences to rotated planes but FBC only have restrictions
against 16bpp, so adding it here.
Also adding a new check for the tiling format, fences are only set
to X and Y tiled planes but again FBC don't have any restrictions
against tiling so adding linear as supported as well, other formats
should be added after tested but IGT only supports drawing in thse
3 formats.
intel_fbc_hw_tracking_covers_screen() maybe can also have the same
treatment as fences but BSpec is not clear if the size limitation is
for hardware tracking or general use of FBC and I don't have a 5K
display to test it, so keeping as is for safety.
v2:
- Added tiling and pixel format rotation checks
- Changed the GEN version not requiring fences to 11 from 9, DDX
needs some changes but it don't have support for GEN11+
v3:
- Changed back to GEN9+
- Moved GEN test to inside of tiling_is_valid()
v4:
- moved rotation check to its own functions
v5:
- renamed rotations_is_valid to rotation_is_valid
- moved pre-g4x rotation check to rotation_is_valid()
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200319211535.114625-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Transcoder timing calculation differ for command mode.
v2: Use is_vid_mode, and use same I915_WRITE (Jani)
v3: Adjust the calculations to reflect dsc compression ratio
v4: Rearrange the vertical and horizontal timing calc, optimize
local variables usage. (Jani)
v5: Fix the values used for calculation, use afe_clk for
byte clock calculation, use intel_de_write/read (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Vandita Kulkarni <vandita.kulkarni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200312053841.2794-3-vandita.kulkarni@intel.com
It looks like some callers expect a non-volatile object, that they do not
want the contents of the pages lost if they happen to not be looking at it.
The shrinker however sees that we mark the pages as DONTNEED and
believes that it can freely reap them. However, since the huge object
use plain pages, they cannot be swapped out as they have no backing
storge, and the only way we can shrink them is by discarding the
contents. In light of the callers wanting to keep the contents around,
both IS_SHRINKABLE and marking the pages as volatile are incorrect.
If we drop the IS_SHRINKABLE flag we avoid the immediate issue of the
shrinker accidentally removing valuable content. We will have to
remember that a huge object is not suitable for exercising the shrinker
interaction -- although we can introduce a shrinkable one if we require.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323130821.47914-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
As we store the handle lookup inside a radix tree, we do not need the
gem_context->mutex except until we need to insert our lookup into the
common radix tree. This takes a small bit of rearranging to ensure that
the lut we insert into the tree is ready prior to actually inserting it
(as soon as it is exposed via the radixtree, it is visible to any other
submission).
v2: For brownie points, remove the goto spaghetti.
v3: Tighten up the closed-handle checks.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323092841.22240-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Few edp panels like Sharp is triggering short and long
hpd pulse after panel is getting powered off.
Currently driver is already ignoring long pulse for eDP
panel but in order to process the short pulse, it turns on
the VDD which requires panel power_cycle_delay + panel_power_on_delay
these delay on Sharp panel introduced the responsiveness overhead
of 800ms in the modeset sequence and as well is in suspend
sequence.
Ignoring any short pulse if panel is powered off.
FIXME: It requires to wait for panel_power_off delay in order
to check the panel power status due to pps_lock because panel triggers
short pulse immediately after writing PP_OFF to PP_CTRL register and
wait_panel_off waits for panel_power_off delay with pps_lock held.
This still creates responsiveness overhead of panel_power_off delay.
v2:
- checking vdd along with panel power to ignore the hpd. [Jani,Ville]
v3:
- safer side check to ignore the long hpd when eDP have power,
adding type of hpd to debug log. [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200318081837.23983-1-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
