150f29f5e6
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2020-09-01 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. There are two small conflicts when pulling, resolve as follows: 1) Merge conflict in tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c between88a8212028("libbpf: Factor out common ELF operations and improve logging") in bpf-next and1e891e513e("libbpf: Fix map index used in error message") in net-next. Resolve by taking the hunk in bpf-next: [...] scn = elf_sec_by_idx(obj, obj->efile.btf_maps_shndx); data = elf_sec_data(obj, scn); if (!scn || !data) { pr_warn("elf: failed to get %s map definitions for %s\n", MAPS_ELF_SEC, obj->path); return -EINVAL; } [...] 2) Merge conflict in drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xsk/rx.c between9647c57b11("xsk: i40e: ice: ixgbe: mlx5: Test for dma_need_sync earlier for better performance") in bpf-next ande20f0dbf20("net/mlx5e: RX, Add a prefetch command for small L1_CACHE_BYTES") in net-next. Resolve the two locations by retaining net_prefetch() and taking xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu() from bpf-next. Should look like: [...] xdp_set_data_meta_invalid(xdp); xsk_buff_dma_sync_for_cpu(xdp, rq->xsk_pool); net_prefetch(xdp->data); [...] We've added 133 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain a total of 246 files changed, 13832 insertions(+), 3105 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Initial support for sleepable BPF programs along with bpf_copy_from_user() helper for tracing to reliably access user memory, from Alexei Starovoitov. 2) Add BPF infra for writing and parsing TCP header options, from Martin KaFai Lau. 3) bpf_d_path() helper for returning full path for given 'struct path', from Jiri Olsa. 4) AF_XDP support for shared umems between devices and queues, from Magnus Karlsson. 5) Initial prep work for full BPF-to-BPF call support in libbpf, from Andrii Nakryiko. 6) Generalize bpf_sk_storage map & add local storage for inodes, from KP Singh. 7) Implement sockmap/hash updates from BPF context, from Lorenz Bauer. 8) BPF xor verification for scalar types & add BPF link iterator, from Yonghong Song. 9) Use target's prog type for BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT prog verification, from Udip Pant. 10) Rework BPF tracing samples to use libbpf loader, from Daniel T. Lee. 11) Fix xdpsock sample to really cycle through all buffers, from Weqaar Janjua. 12) Improve type safety for tun/veth XDP frame handling, from Maciej Żenczykowski. 13) Various smaller cleanups and improvements all over the place. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
================== BPF Selftest Notes ================== General instructions on running selftests can be found in `Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst`_. Additional information about selftest failures are documented here. bpf_iter test failures with clang/llvm 10.0.0 ============================================= With clang/llvm 10.0.0, the following two bpf_iter tests failed: * ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` * ``bpf_iter/netlink`` The symptom for ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` looks like .. code-block:: c 2: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) ... 14: (bf) r2 = r8 15: (0f) r2 += r1 ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pi6 %02x ", &rt->fib6_dst.addr, rt->fib6_dst.plen); 16: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +64) = r2 only read is supported The symptom for ``bpf_iter/netlink`` looks like .. code-block:: c ; struct netlink_sock *nlk = ctx->sk; 2: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) ... 15: (bf) r2 = r7 16: (0f) r2 += r1 ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK %-3d ", s, s->sk_protocol); 17: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r2 only read is supported This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. The fix https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466 has been pushed to llvm 10.x release branch and will be available in 10.0.1. The fix is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk. BPF CO-RE-based tests and Clang version ======================================= A set of selftests use BPF target-specific built-ins, which might require bleeding-edge Clang versions (Clang 12 nightly at this time). Few sub-tests of core_reloc test suit (part of test_progs test runner) require the following built-ins, listed with corresponding Clang diffs introducing them to Clang/LLVM. These sub-tests are going to be skipped if Clang is too old to support them, they shouldn't cause build failures or runtime test failures: - __builtin_btf_type_id() ([0], [1], [2]); - __builtin_preserve_type_info(), __builtin_preserve_enum_value() ([3], [4]). [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74572 [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74668 [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85174 [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83878 [4] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83242