select_idle_cpu() will scan the LLC domain for idle CPUs,
it's always expensive. so the next commit :
1ad3aaf3fc ("sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu()")
introduces a way to limit how many CPUs we scan.
But it consume some CPUs out of 'nr' that are not allowed
for the task and thus waste our attempts. The function
always return nr_cpumask_bits, and we can't find a CPU
which our task is allowed to run.
Cpumask may be too big, similar to select_idle_core(), use
per_cpu_ptr 'select_idle_mask' to prevent stack overflow.
Fixes: 1ad3aaf3fc ("sched/core: Implement new approach to scale select_idle_cpu()")
Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191213024530.28052-1-cj.chengjian@huawei.com
The runqueue of a fair task being remotely reniced is going to get a
resched IPI in order to reassess which task should be the current
running on the CPU. However that evaluation is useless if the fair task
is running alone, in which case we can spare that IPI, preventing
nohz_full CPUs from being disturbed.
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191203160106.18806-2-frederic@kernel.org
The load balance can fail to find a suitable task during the periodic check
because the imbalance is smaller than half of the load of the waiting
tasks. This results in the increase of the number of failed load balance,
which can end up to start an active migration. This active migration is
useless because the current running task is not a better choice than the
waiting ones. In fact, the current task was probably not running but
waiting for the CPU during one of the previous attempts and it had already
not been selected.
When load balance fails too many times to migrate a task, we should relax
the contraint on the maximum load of the tasks that can be migrated
similarly to what is done with cache hotness.
Before the rework, load balance used to set the imbalance to the average
load_per_task in order to mitigate such situation. This increased the
likelihood of migrating a task but also of selecting a larger task than
needed while more appropriate ones were in the list.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1575036287-6052-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Some android-specific EAS patches caused issues during the 5.5-rc1 merge
that contains the load-balance rework. Most of the issues these patches
were fixing should now covered by the rework, which means they are not
needed any more. And for the others, they need to be reworked to fit
with the new LB code.
Fix the 5.5-rc1 merge by removing all the android-specific code from the
load balancer.
Effectively, this reverts 65b8ddef4e ("ANDROID: sched: Prevent
unnecessary active balance of single task in sched group"), f351885fc7
("ANDROID: sched/fair: Attempt to improve throughput for asym cap
systems"), a7455f8123 ("ANDROID: sched/fair: Don't balance misfits if
it would overload local group") and 44ab1611a8 ("ANDROID: sched/fair:
Also do misfit in overloaded groups").
Fixes: d3a196a371 ("Merge 5.5-rc1 into android-mainline")
Change-Id: I15c2e044d9f571be5eac0ced929690d9bf7dec65
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
update_cfs_rq_load_avg() calls cfs_rq_util_change() every time PELT decays,
which might be inefficient when the cpufreq driver has rate limitation.
When a task is attached on a CPU, we have this call path:
update_load_avg()
update_cfs_rq_load_avg()
cfs_rq_util_change -- > trig frequency update
attach_entity_load_avg()
cfs_rq_util_change -- > trig frequency update
The 1st frequency update will not take into account the utilization of the
newly attached task and the 2nd one might be discarded because of rate
limitation of the cpufreq driver.
update_cfs_rq_load_avg() is only called by update_blocked_averages()
and update_load_avg() so we can move the call to
cfs_rq_util_change/cpufreq_update_util() into these two functions.
It's also interesting to note that update_load_avg() already calls
cfs_rq_util_change() directly for the !SMP case.
This change will also ensure that cpufreq_update_util() is called even
when there is no more CFS rq in the leaf_cfs_rq_list to update, but only
IRQ, RT or DL PELT signals.
[ mingo: Minor updates. ]
Reported-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mgorman@suse.de
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: sargun@sargun.me
Cc: srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: xiexiuqi@huawei.com
Cc: xiezhipeng1@huawei.com
Fixes: 039ae8bcf7 ("sched/fair: Fix O(nr_cgroups) in the load balancing path")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1574083279-799-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This reverts commit 9acb7c07b6.
The root problem has now been fixed in 5.4-rc7, so revert this to
prevent merge issues.
Bug: 142182814
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@google.com>
Commit 67692435c4 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path")
inadvertly introduced a race because it changed a previously
unexplored dependency between dropping the rq->lock and
sched_class::put_prev_task().
The comments about dropping rq->lock, in for example
newidle_balance(), only mentions the task being current and ->on_cpu
being set. But when we look at the 'change' pattern (in for example
sched_setnuma()):
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); /* p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED */
running = task_current(rq, p); /* rq->curr == p */
if (queued)
dequeue_task(...);
if (running)
put_prev_task(...);
/* change task properties */
if (queued)
enqueue_task(...);
if (running)
set_next_task(...);
It becomes obvious that if we do this after put_prev_task() has
already been called on @p, things go sideways. This is exactly what
the commit in question allows to happen when it does:
prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf);
if (!rq->nr_running)
newidle_balance(rq, rf);
The newidle_balance() call will drop rq->lock after we've called
put_prev_task() and that allows the above 'change' pattern to
interleave and mess up the state.
Furthermore, it turns out we lost the RT-pull when we put the last DL
task.
Fix both problems by extracting the balancing from put_prev_task() and
doing a multi-class balance() pass before put_prev_task().
Fixes: 67692435c4 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path")
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
The estimated utilization for a task:
util_est = max(util_avg, est.enqueue, est.ewma)
is defined based on:
- util_avg: the PELT defined utilization
- est.enqueued: the util_avg at the end of the last activation
- est.ewma: a exponential moving average on the est.enqueued samples
According to this definition, when a task suddenly changes its bandwidth
requirements from small to big, the EWMA will need to collect multiple
samples before converging up to track the new big utilization.
This slow convergence towards bigger utilization values is not
aligned to the default scheduler behavior, which is to optimize for
performance. Moreover, the est.ewma component fails to compensate for
temporarely utilization drops which spans just few est.enqueued samples.
To let util_est do a better job in the scenario depicted above, change
its definition by making util_est directly follow upward motion and
only decay the est.ewma on downward.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Douglas Raillard <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191023205630.14469-1-patrick.bellasi@matbug.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Since we don't do energy-aware wakeups when we are overutilized, always
honoring sync wakeups in this state does not prevent wake-wide mechanics
overruling the flag as normal.
Having the check for (cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_running == 1) in the test condition
means that we only bypass the energy model for sync wakeups where the
cpu is about to become idle. This matches the use of this flag in Binder
which is the main place where sync wakeups come from in Android.
This patch is based upon previous work to build EAS for android products.
It replaces
commit 79e3a4a27e ("ANDROID: sched: Unconditionally honor sync flag
for energy-aware wakeups")
in what's considered to be 'EAS'.
sync-hint code taken from wahoo
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/4a5e890ec60d
written by Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Change-Id: I4b3d79141fc8e53dc51cd63ac11096c2e3cb10f5
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
(cherry-picked from commit f1ec666a62de)
[ Moved the feature to find_energy_efficient_cpu() and removed the
sysctl knob ]
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
[ Add 'cpu_rq(cpu)->nr_running == 1' to the condition and remove the
word 'Unconditionally' from the patch name ]
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
The load_balance() algorithm contains some heuristics which have become
meaningless since the rework of the scheduler's metrics like the
introduction of PELT.
Furthermore, load is an ill-suited metric for solving certain task
placement imbalance scenarios.
For instance, in the presence of idle CPUs, we should simply try to get at
least one task per CPU, whereas the current load-based algorithm can actually
leave idle CPUs alone simply because the load is somewhat balanced.
The current algorithm ends up creating virtual and meaningless values like
the avg_load_per_task or tweaks the state of a group to make it overloaded
whereas it's not, in order to try to migrate tasks.
load_balance() should better qualify the imbalance of the group and clearly
define what has to be moved to fix this imbalance.
The type of sched_group has been extended to better reflect the type of
imbalance. We now have:
group_has_spare
group_fully_busy
group_misfit_task
group_asym_packing
group_imbalanced
group_overloaded
Based on the type of sched_group, load_balance now sets what it wants to
move in order to fix the imbalance. It can be some load as before but also
some utilization, a number of task or a type of task:
migrate_task
migrate_util
migrate_load
migrate_misfit
This new load_balance() algorithm fixes several pending wrong tasks
placement:
- the 1 task per CPU case with asymmetric system
- the case of cfs task preempted by other class
- the case of tasks not evenly spread on groups with spare capacity
Also the load balance decisions have been consolidated in the 3 functions
below after removing the few bypasses and hacks of the current code:
- update_sd_pick_busiest() select the busiest sched_group.
- find_busiest_group() checks if there is an imbalance between local and
busiest group.
- calculate_imbalance() decides what have to be moved.
Finally, the now unused field total_running of struct sd_lb_stats has been
removed.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: hdanton@sina.com
Cc: parth@linux.ibm.com
Cc: pauld@redhat.com
Cc: quentin.perret@arm.com
Cc: riel@surriel.com
Cc: srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1571405198-27570-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
[ Small readability and spelling updates. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The quota/period ratio is used to ensure a child task group won't get
more bandwidth than the parent task group, and is calculated as:
normalized_cfs_quota() = [(quota_us << 20) / period_us]
If the quota/period ratio was changed during this scaling due to
precision loss, it will cause inconsistency between parent and child
task groups.
See below example:
A userspace container manager (kubelet) does three operations:
1) Create a parent cgroup, set quota to 1,000us and period to 10,000us.
2) Create a few children cgroups.
3) Set quota to 1,000us and period to 10,000us on a child cgroup.
These operations are expected to succeed. However, if the scaling of
147/128 happens before step 3, quota and period of the parent cgroup
will be changed:
new_quota: 1148437ns, 1148us
new_period: 11484375ns, 11484us
And when step 3 comes in, the ratio of the child cgroup will be
104857, which will be larger than the parent cgroup ratio (104821),
and will fail.
Scaling them by a factor of 2 will fix the problem.
Tested-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xuewei Zhang <xueweiz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Fixes: 2e8e192263 ("sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191004001243.140897-1-xueweiz@google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Add to find_energy_efficient_cpu() a latency sensitive case which mimics
what was done for prefer-idle in android-4.19 and before (see [1] for
reference).
This isn't strictly equivalent to the legacy algorithm but comes real
close, and isn't very invasive. Overall, the idea is to select the
biggest idle CPU we can find for latency-sensitive boosted tasks, and
the smallest CPU where the can fit for latency-sensitive non-boosted
tasks.
The main differences with the legacy behaviour are the following:
1. the policy for 'prefer idle' when there isn't a single idle CPU in
the system is simpler now. We just pick the CPU with the highest
spare capacity;
2. the cstate awareness is implemented by minimizing the exit latency
rather than the idle state index. This is how it is done in the slow
path (find_idlest_group_cpu()), it doesn't require us to keep hooks
into CPUIdle, and should actually be better because what we want is
a CPU that can wake up quickly;
3. non-latency-sensitive tasks just use the standard mainline
energy-aware wake-up path, which decides the placement using the
Energy Model;
4. the 'boosted' and 'latency_sensitive' attributes of a task come from
util_clamp (which now replaces schedtune).
[1] c27c56105d
Change-Id: Ia58516906e9cb5abe08385a8cd088097043d8703
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
If we can classify the group as overloaded, that overrides
any classification as misfit but we may still have misfit
tasks present. Check the rq we're looking at to see if
this is the case.
Change-Id: Ida8eb66aa625e34de3fe2ee1b0dd8a78926273d8
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
[Removed stray reference to rq_has_misfit]
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
When load balancing in a system with misfit tasks present, if we always
pull a misfit task to the local group this can lead to pulling a running
task from a smaller capacity CPUs to a bigger CPU which is busy. In this
situation, the pulled task is likely not to get a chance to run before
an idle balance on another small CPU pulls it back. This penalises the
pulled task as it is stopped for a short amount of time and then likely
relocated to a different CPU (since the original CPU just did a NEWLY_IDLE
balance and reset the periodic interval).
If we only do this unconditionally for NEWLY_IDLE balance, we can be
sure that any tasks and load which are present on the local group are
related to short-running tasks which we are happy to displace for a
longer running task in a system with misfit tasks present.
However, other balance types should only pull a task if we think
that the local group is underutilized - checking the number of tasks
gives us a conservative estimate here since if they were short tasks
we would have been doing NEWLY_IDLE balances instead.
Change-Id: I710add1ab1139482620b6addc8370ad194791beb
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
In some systems the capacity and group weights line up to defeat all the
small imbalance correction conditions in fix_small_imbalance, which can
cause bad task placement. Add a new condition if the existing code can't
see anything to fix:
If we have asymmetric capacity, and there are more tasks than CPUs in
the busiest group *and* there are less tasks than CPUs in the local group
then we try to pull something. There could be transient small tasks which
prevent this from working, but on the whole it is beneficial for those
systems with inconvenient capacity/cluster size relationships.
Change-Id: Icf81cde215c082a61f816534b7990ccb70aee409
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Scenarios with the busiest group having just one task and the local
being idle on topologies with sched groups with different numbers of
cpus manage to dodge all load-balance bailout conditions resulting the
nr_balance_failed counter to be incremented. This eventually causes a
pointless active migration of the task. This patch prevents this by not
incrementing the counter when the busiest group only has one task.
ASYM_PACKING migrations and migrations due to reduced capacity should
still take place as these are explicitly captured by
need_active_balance().
A better solution would be to not attempt the load-balance in the first
place, but that requires significant changes to the order of bailout
conditions and statistics gathering.
Change-Id: I28f69c72febe0211decbe77b7bc3e48839d3d7b3
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Wakeup balancing uses cpu capacity awareness and needs to know the
system-wide maximum cpu capacity.
Patch "sched: Store system-wide maximum cpu capacity in root domain"
finds the system-wide maximum cpu capacity during scheduler domain
hierarchy setup. This is sufficient as long as maximum frequency
invariance is not enabled.
If it is enabled, the system-wide maximum cpu capacity can change
between scheduler domain hierarchy setups due to frequency capping.
The cpu capacity is changed in update_cpu_capacity() which is called in
load balance on the lowest scheduler domain hierarchy level. To be able
to know if a change in cpu capacity for a certain cpu also has an effect
on the system-wide maximum cpu capacity it is normally necessary to
iterate over all cpus. This would be way too costly. That's why this
patch follows a different approach.
The unsigned long max_cpu_capacity value in struct root_domain is
replaced with a struct max_cpu_capacity, containing value (the
max_cpu_capacity) and cpu (the cpu index of the cpu providing the
maximum cpu_capacity).
Changes to the system-wide maximum cpu capacity and the cpu index are
made if:
1 System-wide maximum cpu capacity < cpu capacity
2 System-wide maximum cpu capacity > cpu capacity and cpu index == cpu
There are no changes to the system-wide maximum cpu capacity in all
other cases.
Atomic read and write access to the pair (max_cpu_capacity.val,
max_cpu_capacity.cpu) is enforced by max_cpu_capacity.lock.
The access to max_cpu_capacity.val in task_fits_max() is still performed
without taking the max_cpu_capacity.lock.
The code to set max cpu capacity in build_sched_domains() has been
removed because the whole functionality is now provided by
update_cpu_capacity() instead.
This approach can introduce errors temporarily, e.g. in case the cpu
currently providing the max cpu capacity has its cpu capacity lowered
due to frequency capping and calls update_cpu_capacity() before any cpu
which might provide the max cpu now.
Change-Id: I5063befab088fbf49e5d5e484ce0c6ee6165283a
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>*
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
(- Fixed cherry-pick issues, and conflict with a0fe2cf086 "sched/fair:
Tune down misfit NOHZ kicks" which makes use of max_cpu_capacity
- Squashed "sched/fair: remove printk while schedule is in progress"
fix from Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To be able to scale the cpu capacity by this factor introduce a call to
the new arch scaling function arch_scale_max_freq_capacity() in
update_cpu_capacity() and provide a default implementation which returns
SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE.
Another subsystem (e.g. cpufreq) or architectural or platform specific
code can overwrite this default implementation, exactly as for frequency
and cpu invariance. It has to be enabled by the arch by defining
arch_scale_max_freq_capacity to the actual implementation.
Change-Id: I770a8b1f4f7340e9e314f71c64a765bf880f4b4d
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
( Fixed conflict with scaling against the PELT-based scale_rt_capacity )
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Since we don't do energy-aware wakeups when we are overutilized, always
honoring sync wakeups in this state does not prevent wake-wide mechanics
overruling the flag as normal.
This patch is based upon previous work to build EAS for android products.
sync-hint code taken from commit 4a5e890ec60d
"sched/fair: add tunable to force selection at cpu granularity" written
by Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Change-Id: I4b3d79141fc8e53dc51cd63ac11096c2e3cb10f5
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
(cherry-picked from commit f1ec666a62dec1083ed52fe1ddef093b84373aaf)
[ Moved the feature to find_energy_efficient_cpu() and removed the
sysctl knob ]
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Utilization clamping can be used to boost the utilization of small tasks
or cap that of big tasks. Thus, one of its possible usages is to bias
tasks placement to "promote" small tasks on higher capacity (less energy
efficient) CPUs or "constraint" big tasks on small capacity (more energy
efficient) CPUs.
When the Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) looks for the most energy
efficient CPU to run a task on, it currently considers only the
effective utiliation estimated for a task.
Fix this by adding an additional check to skip CPUs which capacity is
smaller then the task clamped utilization.
Change-Id: I43fa6fa27e27c1eb5272c6a45d1a6a5b0faae1aa
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Commit:
de53fd7aed ("sched/fair: Fix low cpu usage with high throttling by removing expiration of cpu-local slices")
introduced a few compilation warnings:
kernel/sched/fair.c: In function '__refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime':
kernel/sched/fair.c:4365:6: warning: variable 'now' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
kernel/sched/fair.c: In function 'start_cfs_bandwidth':
kernel/sched/fair.c:4992:6: warning: variable 'overrun' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Also, __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime() does no longer update the
expiration time, so fix the comments accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linux@indeed.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: pauld@redhat.com
Fixes: de53fd7aed ("sched/fair: Fix low cpu usage with high throttling by removing expiration of cpu-local slices")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1566326455-8038-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Remove work arounds that were written before there was a grace period
after tasks left the runqueue in finish_task_switch().
In particular now that there tasks exiting the runqueue exprience
a RCU grace period none of the work performed by task_rcu_dereference()
excpet the rcu_dereference() is necessary so replace task_rcu_dereference()
with rcu_dereference().
Remove the code in rcuwait_wait_event() that checks to ensure the current
task has not exited. It is no longer necessary as it is guaranteed
that any running task will experience a RCU grace period after it
leaves the run queueue.
Remove the comment in rcuwait_wake_up() as it is no longer relevant.
Ref: 8f95c90ceb ("sched/wait, RCU: Introduce rcuwait machinery")
Ref: 150593bf86 ("sched/api: Introduce task_rcu_dereference() and try_get_task_struct()")
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87lfurdpk9.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
