In overlay application we noticed that dma channel node probe order is
inverted i.e s2mm channel is probed first followed by mm2s channel. The
reason for this inversion is fdtoverlay utility which uses a function
called fdt_add_subnode(*). It stores the subnodes after the properties,
this has the effect of inserting the new subnode before any others and
the end result is a reversal.
Because of this inverted channel probe order, the node probed first is
assigned a '0' index instead of Channel ID should be '0' for tx and '1'
for rx and dmatest client using the DT convention fails in dma transfer
as channel are swapped.
To fix above behavior and make channel assignment index independent
of probe order, always assign mm2s channel at '0' index and the s2mm
channel at IP specific fixed offset derived from the max_channels
count.
Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1580388865-9960-3-git-send-email-radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
This patch fixes BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context in
stm32_dma_disable_chan function.
The goal of this function is to force channel disable if it has not been
disabled by hardware. This consists in clearing STM32_DMA_SCR_EN bit and
read it as 0 to ensure the channel is well disabled and the last transfer
is over.
In previous implementation, the waiting loop was based on a do...while (1)
with a call to cond_resched to give the scheduler a chance to run a higher
priority process.
But in some conditions, stm32_dma_disable_chan can be called while
preemption is disabled, on a stm32_dma_stop call for example. So
cond_resched must not be used.
To avoid this, use readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic to poll
STM32_DMA_SCR_EN bit cleared.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200129153628.29329-8-amelie.delaunay@st.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
There is a DMA problem with the serial ports on i.MX6.
When the following sequence is performed:
1) Open a port
2) Write some data
3) Close the port
4) Open a *different* port
5) Write some data
6) Close the port
The second write sends nothing and the second close hangs.
If the first close() is omitted it works.
Adding logs to the the UART driver shows that the DMA is being setup but
the callback is never invoked for the second write.
This used to work in 4.19.
Git bisect leads to:
ad0d92d: "dmaengine: imx-sdma: refine to load context only once"
This commit adds a "context_loaded" flag used to avoid unnecessary context
setups.
However the flag is only reset in sdma_channel_terminate_work(),
which is only invoked in a worker triggered by sdma_terminate_all() IF
there is an active descriptor.
So, if no active descriptor remains when the channel is terminated, the
flag is not reset and, when the channel is later reused the old context
is used.
Fix the problem by always resetting the flag in sdma_free_chan_resources().
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group>
Fixes: ad0d92d7ba ("dmaengine: imx-sdma: refine to load context only once")
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1580305274-27274-1-git-send-email-martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Reset DMA channel after stop to ensure that pending transfers and FIFOs
in the datapath are flushed or completed. It also cleanup the terminate
path and removes stop for the cyclic mode as after the reset stop is not
required. This fixes intermittent data verification failure when xilinx
dma test the client is stressed and loaded/unloaded multiple times.
Signed-off-by: Radhey Shyam Pandey <radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1580283909-32678-1-git-send-email-radhey.shyam.pandey@xilinx.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214171302.GA20586@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214171657.GA25663@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214171536.GA24077@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214171435.GA22930@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
When we receive back the descriptor of the terminated transfer the cookie
must be marked as completed to make sure that the accounting is correct.
In udma_tx_status() the status should be marked as completed if the channel
is no longer running (it can only happen if the channel is not yet started
for the first time, or after a channel termination).
Fixes: 25dcb5dd7b ("dmaengine: ti: New driver for K3 UDMA")
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214091441.27535-7-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
It should be possible to pause, resume and check the pause state of a
channel even if we do not have active transfer.
udma_is_chan_paused() can trigger NULL pointer reference in it's current
form when the status is checked while uc->desc is NULL.
Fixes: 25dcb5dd7b ("dmaengine: ti: New driver for K3 UDMA")
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214091441.27535-6-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Use the generic TR setup function to get the TR counters for both cyclic
and slave_sg transfers.
This way the period_size for cyclic and sg_dma_len() for slave_sg can be
as large as (SZ_64K - 1) * (SZ_64K - 1) and we can handle cases when the
length is >SZ_64K and a prime number.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214091441.27535-5-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
When a channel is asked to be stopped (teardown) and we do not have active
descriptor to receive stale data buffered on the remote side then the
teardown will not complete as UDMA needs a descriptor to be able to flush
out the DMA pipe.
The peer is trying to push the data to UDMA in teardown, but UDMA is
pushing back because it has no descriptor which would allow it to drain the
data.
The workaround is to create 1K 'trashcan' to receive the discarded data and
set up descriptors for packet and TR mode channels.
When a channel is stopped and there is no active descriptor then a
descriptor is pushed to the ring for UDMA before the teardown is initiated.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214091441.27535-3-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c: In function sun4i_dma_prep_dma_cyclic:
drivers/dma/sun4i-dma.c:672:24: warning:
variable linear_mode set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
commit ffc079a4ac ("dmaengine: sun4i: Add support for cyclic requests with dedicated DMA")
involved this, explicitly using the value makes the code more readable.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200207024445.44600-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213003925.GA6906@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213003535.GA3269@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213003703.GA4177@embeddedor.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
