Currently we disable all the watermarks above the selected max
level for every plane. That would mean that the cursor's watermarks
may also get modified when another plane causes the selected
max watermark level to change. That is not so great as we would
like to keep the cursor as indepenedent as possible to avoid
having to throttle it in resposne to other plane activity.
To avoid that let's keep the watermarks enabled even for levels
above the max selected watermark level, iff the plane has enough
ddb for that particular level. This way the cursor's enabled
watermarks only depend on the cursor itself. This is safe because
the hardware will never choose to use a watermark level unless
all enabled planes have also enabled that level.
Cc: Neel Desai <neel.desai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190312205844.6339-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Currently we just assume that 32 or 8 blocks of ddb is sufficient
for the cursor. The 32 might be, but the 8 is certainly not. The
minimum we need is at least what level 0 watermarks need, but that
is a bit restrictive, so instead let's calculate what level 7
would need for a 256x256 cursor. We'll use that to determine the
fixed ddb allocation for the cursor. This way the cursor will never
be responsible for missing out on deeper power saving states.
v2: Loop to make sure this works even if some wm levels are
totally disabled (latency==0)
Cc: Neel Desai <neel.desai@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> #v1
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190319160311.23529-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Exercise acquiring and releasing forcewake around register reads. In
order to read a register behind a GT powerwell, we need to instruct that
powerwell to wake up using a forcewake. When we no longer require the GT
powerwell, we tell the GT to release our forcewake. Inside the
forcewake, the register read should work but outside it should just
return garbage, 0 being the most common garbage. Thus we can detect when
we are inside and outside of the forcewake with just a simple register
read, and so can verify that the GT powerwell is released when we say
so.
v2: Picking the right forcewaked register to return 0 outside of
forcewake is an art.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190320080052.27273-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When calling vmw_fb_set_par(), the mode stored in par->set_mode gets free'd
twice. The first free is in vmw_fb_kms_detach(), the second is near the
end of vmw_fb_set_par() under the name of 'old_mode'. The mode-setting code
only works correctly if the mode doesn't actually change. Removing
'old_mode' in favor of using par->set_mode directly fixes the problem.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: a278724aa2 ("drm/vmwgfx: Implement fbdev on kms v2")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
If it's not a system error and get_node implementation accommodate the
buffer object then it should return 0 with memm::mm_node set to NULL.
v2: Test for id != -ENOMEM instead of id == -ENOSPC.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 4eb085e42f ("drm/vmwgfx: Convert to new IDA API")
Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
userptr may cross two VMAs if the forked child process (not call exec
after fork) malloc buffer, then free it, and then malloc larger size
buf, kerenl will create new VMA adjacent to old VMA which was cloned
from parent process, some pages of userptr are in the first VMA, the
rest pages are in the second VMA.
HMM expects range only have one VMA, loop over all VMAs in the address
range, create multiple ranges to handle this case. See
is_mergeable_anon_vma in mm/mmap.c for details.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Userptr restore may have concurrent userptr invalidation after
hmm_vma_fault adds the range to the hmm->ranges list, needs call
hmm_vma_range_done to remove the range from hmm->ranges list first,
then reschedule the restore worker. Otherwise hmm_vma_fault will add
same range to the list, this will cause loop in the list because
range->next point to range itself.
Add function untrack_invalid_user_pages to reduce code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Further testing showed that the idea with the chash doesn't work as expected.
Especially we can't predict when we can remove the entries from the hash again.
So replace the chash with a ring buffer/hash mix where entries in the container
age automatically based on their timestamp.
v2: use ring buffer / hash mix
v3: check the timeout to make sure all entries age
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Only process a maximum of 32 IVs before writing back the RPTR. This improves
hw handling when we get close to an overflow in the ring buffer.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Disable overflow and enable full drain. This makes fault handling on ring 1
much more reliable since we don't generate back pressure any more.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Acked-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The buffers should be cleared when possible but we also don't want
buffer creation to fail in the rare case where the ring isn't ready
during the call. This could happen during some suspend/resume sequences.
Cc: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The dumb_create API isn't intended for high performance rendering
and it's more useful for userspace (ie. IGT) to have them precleared.
The bonus here is that we also won't needlessly leak whatever was
previously in VRAM, but it also probably wasn't sensitive if it was
going through this API.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
add ras post init function.
Do some initialization after all IP have finished their late init.
Add new member flags which will control the ras work flow.
For now, vbios enable ras for us on boot. That might change in the
future.
So there should be a flag from vbios to tell us if ras is enabled or not
on boot. Looks like there is no such info now.
Other bits of the flags are reserved to control other parts of ras.
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
lockdep need a static key.
Previously we set ignore bit to avoid the warning.
Now call sysfs_attr_init to initialize the static key.
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Unzero char is accepted by sscanf, so when data is structure but
unexpectedly return error invalid;
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Feifei Xu <Feifei.Xu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Currently, it is not clear how ras is supported. Both software and
hardware can set the supported. That is confusing.
Fix it by adding new member hw_supported.
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The descriptions of modinfo wrongly show two parameters
for each feature(see below). This patch can fix this
incorrect outputs.
parm: amdgpu_ras_enable:Enable RAS features on the GPU (0 = disable, 1 = enable, -1 = auto (default))
parm: ras_enable:int
parm: amdgpu_ras_mask:Mask of RAS features to enable (default 0xffffffff), only valid when ras_enable == 1
parm: ras_mask:uint
Signed-off-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Suspend will put irq, so resume need get irq back.
And in the same time, skip other ras initialization.
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
