This attempts to address outstanding review feedback from
commit b8a2948fa2 ("drm/panel: simple: Add ability to override typical timing")
Specifically:
* It was requested that I document (in the structure definition) that
the device tree override had no effect if 'struct drm_display_mode'
was used in the panel description. I have provided full Doxygen
comments for 'struct panel_desc' to accomplish that.
* panel_simple_get_fixed_modes() was thought to be a confusing name,
so it has been renamed to panel_simple_get_display_modes().
* panel_simple_parse_override_mode() was thought to be better named as
panel_simple_parse_panel_timing_node().
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712163333.231884-1-dianders@chromium.org
The horizontal blanking periods are too short, as the values are
specified for a single LVDS channel. Since this panel is dual LVDS
they need to be doubled. With this change the panel reaches its
nominal vrefresh rate of 60Fps, instead of the 64Fps with the
current wrong blanking.
Philipp Zabel added:
The datasheet specifies 960 active clocks + 40/128/160 clocks blanking
on each of the two LVDS channels (min/typical/max), so doubled this is
now correct.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1562764060.23869.12.camel@pengutronix.de
Convert the AUO b101ean01 from using a fixed mode to specifying a
display timing with min/typ/max values.
The AUO b101ean01's datasheet says:
* Vertical blanking min is 12
* Horizontal blanking min is 60
* Pixel clock is between 65.3 MHz and 75 MHz
The goal here is to be able to specify the proper timing in device
tree to use on rk3288-veyron-minnie to match what the downstream
kernel is using so that it can used the fixed PLL.
Changes in v4:
- display_timing for AUO b101ean01 new for v4.
Changes in v6:
- Rebased to drm-misc next
- Added tags
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190711203455.125667-4-dianders@chromium.org
Convert the Innolux n116bge from using a fixed mode to specifying a
display timing with min/typ/max values.
Note that the n116bge's datasheet doesn't fit too well into DRM's way
of specifying things. Specifically the panel's datasheet just
specifies the vertical blanking period and horizontal blanking period
and doesn't break things out. For now we'll leave everything as a
fixed value but just allow adjusting the pixel clock. I've added a
comment on what the datasheet claims so someone could later expand
things to fit their needs if they wanted to test other blanking
periods.
The goal here is to be able to specify the panel timings in the device
tree for several rk3288 Chromebooks (like rk3288-veryon-jerry). These
Chromebooks have all been running in the downstream kernel with the
standard porches and sync lengths but just with a slightly slower
pixel clock because the 76.42 MHz clock is not achievable from the
fixed PLL that was available. These Chromebooks only achieve a
refresh rate of ~58 Hz. While it's probable that we could adjust the
timings to achieve 60 Hz it's probably wisest to match what's been
running on these devices all these years.
I'll note that though the upstream kernel has always tried to achieve
76.42 MHz, it has actually been running at 74.25 MHz also since the
video processor is parented off the same fixed PLL.
Changes in v4:
- display_timing for Innolux n116bge new for v4.
Changes in v5:
- Added Heiko's Tested-by
Changes in v6:
- Rebased to drm-misc next
- Added tags
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190711203455.125667-3-dianders@chromium.org
This patch adds the ability to override the typical display timing for a
given panel. This is useful for devices which have timing constraints
that do not apply across the entire display driver (eg: to avoid
crosstalk between panel and digitizer on certain laptops). The rules are
as follows:
- panel must not specify fixed mode (since the override mode will
either be the same as the fixed mode, or we'll be unable to
check the bounds of the overried)
- panel must specify at least one display_timing range which will be
used to ensure the override mode fits within its bounds
Changes in v2:
- Parse the full display-timings node (using the native-mode) (Rob)
Changes in v3:
- No longer parse display-timings subnode, use panel-timing (Rob)
Changes in v4:
- Don't add mode from timing if override was specified (Thierry)
- Add warning if timing and fixed mode was specified (Thierry)
- Don't add fixed mode if timing was specified (Thierry)
- Refactor/rename a bit to avoid extra indentation from "if" tests
- i should be unsigned (Thierry)
- Add annoying WARN_ONs for some cases (Thierry)
- Simplify 'No display_timing found' handling (Thierry)
- Rename to panel_simple_parse_override_mode() (Thierry)
Changes in v5:
- Added Heiko's Tested-by
Changes in v6:
- Rebased to drm-misc next
- Added tags
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@chromium.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190711203455.125667-2-dianders@chromium.org
Add ACX467AKM-7 4.95" 1080×1920 LCD panel that is found on the LG Nexus
5 (hammerhead) phone.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
[masneyb@onstation.org: checkpatch fixes; rename jdi,1080p-hammerhead
binding to lg,acx467akm-7.]
Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181124200628.24393-2-masneyb@onstation.org
The DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_(POS|NEG)EDGE and
DRM_BUS_FLAG_SYNC_(POS|NEG)EDGE flags are deprecated in favour of the
new DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_(DRIVE|SAMPLE)_(POS|NEG)EDGE and
new DRM_BUS_FLAG_SYNC_(DRIVE|SAMPLE)_(POS|NEG)EDGE flags. Replace them
through the code.
This effectively changes the value of the .sampling_edge bridge timings
field in the dumb-vga-dac driver. This is safe to do as no driver
consumes these values yet.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Tested-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
drm-next is forwarded to v4.20-rc1, and we need this to make
a patch series apply.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
As far as I can tell the panel that was added in commit da50bd4258
("drm/panel: simple: Add Innolux TV123WAM panel driver support")
wasn't actually an Innolux TV123WAM but was actually an Innolux
P120ZDG-BF1.
As far as I can tell the Innolux TV123WAM isn't a real panel and but
it's a mosh between the TI TV123WAM and the Innolux P120ZDG-BF1.
Let's unmosh.
Here's my evidence:
* Searching for TV123WAM on the Internet turns up a TI panel. While
it's possible that an Innolux panel has the same model number as the
TI Panel, it seems a little doubtful. Looking up the datasheet from
the TI Panel shows that it's 1920 x 1280 and 259.2 mm x 172.8 mm.
* As far as I know, the patch adding the Innolux Panel was supposed to
be for the board that's sitting in front of me as I type this
(support for that board is not yet upstream). On the back of that
panel I see Innolux P120ZDZ-EZ1 rev B1.
* Someone pointed me at a datasheet that's supposed to be for the
panel in front of me (sorry, I can't share the datasheet). That
datasheet has the string "p120zdg-bf1"
* If I search for "P120ZDG-BF1" on the Internet I get hits for panels
that are 2160x1440. They don't have datasheets, but the fact that
the resolution matches is a good sign.
In any case, let's update the name and also the physical size to match
the correct panel.
Fixes: da50bd4258 ("drm/panel: simple: Add Innolux TV123WAM panel driver support")
Cc: Sandeep Panda <spanda@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-6-dianders@chromium.org
Some eDP panels that are designed to be always connected to a board
use their HPD signal to signal that they've finished powering on and
they're ready to be talked to.
However, for various reasons it's possible that the HPD signal from
the panel isn't actually hooked up. In the case where the HPD isn't
hooked up you can look at the timing diagram on the panel datasheet
and insert a delay for the maximum amount of time that the HPD might
take to come up.
Let's add support in simple-panel for this concept.
At the moment we will co-opt the existing "prepare" delay to keep
track of the delay and we'll use a boolean to specify that a given
panel should only apply the delay if the "no-hpd" property was
specified.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025222134.174583-2-dianders@chromium.org
This panel is marketed as Banana Pi 7" LCD display. On the back is
a sticker denoting the model name S070WV20-CT16.
This is a 7" 800x480 panel connected through a 24-bit RGB interface.
However the panel only does 262k colors.
Depending on the variant, the PCB attached to the panel module either
supports DSI, or DSI + 24-bit RGB. DSI is converted to 24-bit RGB via
an onboard ICN6211 MIPI DSI - RGB bridge chip, then fed to the panel
itself.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180907041948.19913-5-wens@csie.org
This patch adds support for DLC DLC0700YZG-1 1024x600 LVDS panels
to the simple-panel driver.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
[m.felsch@pengutronix.de: fix typo in compatible dt-binding]
[m.felsch@pengutronix.de: add property bindings]
Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180523092504.5142-3-m.felsch@pengutronix.de
The Emerging Display Technology ETM0700G0EDH6 is the
uses the same panel as the ETM0700G0BDH6. It differs
in the hardware design for the backlight and the
touchscreen i2c interface. As the new display type has
different requirements for drive-strengths on the i2c-bus,
add an additional compatible to allow the handling of it or warn
about incompatible cpu and display combinations.
Signed-off-by: Jan Tuerk <jan.tuerk@emtrion.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180619095546.24445-3-jan.tuerk@emtrion.com
