Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by
the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at
your option any later version this program is distributed in the
hope that it will be useful but without any warranty without even
the implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular
purpose see the gnu general public license for more details you
should have received a copy of the gnu general public license along
with this program if not write to the free software foundation inc
51 franklin st fifth floor boston ma 02110 1301 usa
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-or-later
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 50 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190523091649.499889647@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
prom_putchar() is used centrally in early printk infrastructure therefore
at least MIPS should agree on the function return type.
[paul.burton@mips.com:
- Include linux/types.h in asm/setup.h to gain the bool typedef before
we start include asm/setup.h elsewhere.
- Include asm/setup.h in all files that use or define prom_putchar().
- Also standardise on signed rather than unsigned char argument.]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/19842/
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
This patch changes all absolute SYS_XY registers to offsets from the
SYS block base, prefixes them with AU1000 to avoid silent failures due
to changed addresses, and introduces helper functions to read/write
them.
No functional changes, comparing assembly of a few select functions shows
no differences.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/7464/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Having received another series of whitespace patches I decided to do this
once and for all rather than dealing with this kind of patches trickling
in forever.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Without this udelay(1) PCI idsel does not work correctly on the
"singleboard" (T-Mobile Surfbox) for the MiniPCI device. The result is
that PCI configuration fails and the MiniPCI card is not detected
correctly. Instead of
PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x40000000-0x4fffffff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x1000-0xffff]
pci 0000:00:03.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x40000000-0x4000ffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x40010000-0x40010fff]
pci 0000:00:00.1: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x40011000-0x40011fff]
We see only the CardBus device:
PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x40000000-0x4fffffff]
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x1000-0xffff]
pci 0000:00:00.0: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x40000000-0x40000fff]
pci 0000:00:00.1: BAR 0: assigned [mem 0x40001000-0x40001fff]
Later the device driver shows this error:
ath5k 0000:00:03.0: cannot remap PCI memory region
ath5k: probe of 0000:00:03.0 failed with error -5
I assume that the logic chip which usually supresses the signal to the CardBus
card has some settling time and without the delay it would still let the
Cardbus interfere with the response from the MiniPCI card.
What I cannot explain is why this behaviour shows up now and not in earlier
kernel versions before. Maybe older PCI code was slower?
Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: manuel.lauss@googlemail.com
Cc: florian@openwrt.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/4087/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
