Same as the other registers. This one also appeared on Haswell for the
first time, so that's why we are renaming it.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because the PIPECONF register is actually part of the CPU transcoder,
not the CPU pipe.
Ideally we would also rename PIPECONF to TRANSCONF to remind people
that they should use the transcoder instead of the pipe, but let's
keep it like this for now since most Gens still name it PIPECONF.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because there's one instance of the register per CPU transcoder and
not per CPU pipe. This is another register that appeared for the first
time on Haswell, and even though its Haswell name is
PIPE_DDI_FUNC_CTL, it will be renamed to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL, so let's
just use the new naming scheme before it confuses more people.
Notice that there's a big improvement on intel_ddi_get_hw_state due to
the new TRANSCODER_EDP.
V2: Also rename the register to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL as suggested by
Damien Lespiau.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This register appeared in Haswell. It does not have an EDP version
because the EDP transcoder is always tied to the DDIA clock. Notice
that if we call PIPE_CLK_SEL(pipe) when pipe is PIPE_A and transcoder
is TRANSCODER_EDP we might introduce a bug, that's why this is a
transcoder register even though it does not have an EDP version.
Even though Haswell names this register PIPE_CLK_SEL, it will be
renamed to TRANS_CLK_SEL in the future, so let's just start using the
real name that makes more sense and avoids misusage.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Before Haswell we used to have the CPU pipes and the PCH transcoders.
We had the same amount of pipes and transcoders, and there was a 1:1
mapping between them. After Haswell what we used to call CPU pipe was
split into CPU pipe and CPU transcoder. So now we have 3 CPU pipes (A,
B and C), 4 CPU transcoders (A, B, C and EDP) and 1 PCH transcoder
(only used for VGA).
For all the outputs except for EDP we have an 1:1 mapping on the CPU
pipes and CPU transcoders, so if you're using CPU pipe A you have to
use CPU transcoder A. When have an eDP output you have to use
transcoder EDP and you can attach this CPU transcoder to any of the 3
CPU pipes. When using VGA you need to select a pair of matching CPU
pipes/transcoders (A/A, B/B, C/C) and you also need to enable/use the
PCH transcoder.
For now we're just creating the cpu_transcoder definitions and setting
cpu_transcoder to TRANSCODER_EDP on DDI eDP code, but none of the
registers was ported to use transcoder instead of pipe. The goal is to
keep the code backwards-compatible since on all cases except when
using eDP we must have pipe == cpu_transcoder.
V2: Comment the haswell_crtc_off chunk, suggested by Damien Lespiau
and Daniel Vetter.
We currently need the haswell_crtc_off chunk because TRANSCODER_EDP
can be used by any CRTC, so when you stop using it you have to stop
saying you're using it, otherwise you may have at some point 2 CRTCs
claiming they're using TRANSCODER_EDP (a disabled CRTC and an enabled
one), then the HW state readout code will get completely confused.
In other words:
Imagine the following case:
xrandr --output eDP1 --auto --crtc 0
xrandr --output eDP1 --off
xrandr --output eDP1 --auto --crtc 2
After the last command you could get a "pipe A assertion failure
(expected off, current on)" because CRTC 0 still claims it's using
TRANSCODER_EDP, so the HW state readout function will read it
(through PIPECONF) and expect it to be off, when it's actually on
because it's being used by CRTC 2.
So when we make "intel_crtc->cpu_transcoder = intel_crtc->pipe" we
make sure we're pointing to our own original CRTC which is certainly
not used by any other CRTC.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Ironlake we have one PCH transcoder and FDI per pipe, so we know
that if ironlake_crtc_driving_pch returns false we can disable the PCH
transcoder and we also know that when we disable the crtc we can also
disable the PCH transcoder.
On Haswell there is only 1 PCH transcoder and FDI and they can be used
by any CRTC. So if for one specific crtc haswell_crtc_driving_pch
returns false we can't assert anything about the state of the PCH
transcoder or the FDI link without checking if any other CRTC is using
the PCH.
So on this commit remove the "assert_fdi_{t,r}x_disabled" form
haswell_crtc_enable and also only disable FDI and the PCH transcoder
if the port being disabled was actually a PCH port (we only have one
port using PCH: the VGA port).
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
By forking Ironlake and Haswell functions. The only callers are
{ironlake,haswell}_crtc_enable anyway, and this way we won't need to
add other checks on the Haswell version for the next gens.
V2: Even simpler, as pointed by Jani Nikula.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
These functions were forked from their Ironlake versions, so now fix
the gen checks to reflect the fact that they will only run on Haswell.
It is worth noticing that we are not considering IBX/CPT possible on
Haswell anymore. So far on Haswell enablement we kept trying to still
consider IBX/CPT as a possibility with a Haswell CPU, but this was
never tested, I really doubt it will work with the current code and we
don't really have plans to support it. Future patches will remove the
IBX/CPT code from other Haswell functions. Notice that we still have a
WARN on haswell_crtc_mode_set in case we detect non-LPT PCH.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The way we enable and disable the PCH on Haswell changed considerably
since now we have only one PCH transcoder, so we can't keep the same
asserts and we also can't just unconditionally disable the PCH
transcoder for non-PCH outputs. So let's fork a Haswell version.
These new functions look exactly the same as the ironlake versions.
The next patches will introduce the differences.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Identical #define is now available in include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h, nuke the
dupe.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Otherwise dp aux won't work on some hsw platforms, since they use a
different rawclk than the 125MHz clock used thus far.
To absolutely not change anything, round up: That way we get the old
63 divider for the default 125MHz clock.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We need this when the bios forgets even to set that bit up. Most seem
to do that, even when they don't set up anything else in the panel
power sequencer.
Note that on IBX the rawclk is variable according to Bspec, but
everyone is using 125MHz. The rawclk is fixed to 125MHz on CPT, but
luckily we still have the same register available. On hsw, different
variants have different clocks, hence we need to check the register.
Since other pieces are driven by the rawclock, too, keep the little
helper in a central place.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Like we already do for the LVDS panels. This seems to help greatly
in setting up the backlight, since the BIOS might refuse to cooperate.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
v2: Move the backlight_off call from panel_off to edp_backlight_off,
noticed by Paulo Zanoni.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
GART and VRAM size limits need to be a power of two.
Fix values greater than 1GB and simplify those checks a bit.
v2: also fix radeon_vram_limit usage, and simplify test even more.
v3: agd5f: fix spelling as noticed by Klaus Schnass
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Like in the case of native hdmi, which is fixed already in
commit adf00b26d1
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date: Tue Sep 25 13:23:34 2012 -0300
drm/i915: make sure we write all the DIP data bytes
we need to clear the entire sdvo buffer to avoid upsetting the
display.
Since infoframe buffer writing is now a bit more elaborate, extract it
into it's own function. This will be useful if we ever get around to
properly update the ELD for sdvo. Also #define proper names for the
two buffer indexes with fixed usage.
v2: Cite the right commit above, spotted by Paulo Zanoni.
v3: I'm too stupid to paste the right commit.
v4: Ben Hutchings noticed that I've failed to handle an underflow in
my loop logic, breaking it for i >= length + 8. Since I've just lost C
programmer license, use his solution. Also, make the frustrated 0-base
buffer size a notch more clear.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jürg Billeter <j@bitron.ch>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25732
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
3 changes:
- If a given value is unset, use the maximal limits from the eDP spec.
- Write back the new values, since otherwise the panel power sequencing
hw will not dtrt.
- Revert the early bail-out in case the register values are unset.
The last change reverts
commit bfa3384a9a
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Tue Apr 10 11:58:04 2012 -0700
drm/i915: check PPS regs for sanity when using eDP
v2:
- Unlock the PP regs as the very first thing. This is a required w/a
for cpu eDP on port A, and generally a good idea.
- Fixup the panel power control port selection bits.
v3: Paulo Zanoni noticed that I've fumbled the computation of the spec
limit values. Fix them up. We've also noticed that the t8/t9 values in
the vbt/bios-programmed pp are much larger than any limits. My guess
is that this is to conceal any backlight enable/disable delays. So by
using the much shorter limits from the spec, which only concerns the
sink, we risk that we might display before the backlight is fully on,
or disable the output while the backlight still has afterglow. I've
figured I don't care too much, since this will only happen when both
the pp regs are not programmed, and the vbt tables don't contain
anything useful.
v4: Don't set the port selection bits on hsw/LPT, they don't exist any
more.
v5: Fixup spelling issues in comments, as noticed by Jesse Barnes.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Haswell does not have a scaler in the sprite pipeline anymore, so let's
ensure:
1/ We bail out of update_plate() when someone is trying to ask to
display a scaled framebuffer,
2/ We never write to the nonexistent SPR_SCALE register
v2: Smash in the fixup from Damien in the disable_plane function.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> (for v1)
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (for v1)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
... like the comment says. No idea whether this has any effect, but
I guess it's better to not lie to the display by acking a test request
and never following through with it. This goes back to the commit that
originally introduced this code:
commit a60f0e38d7
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Thu Oct 20 15:09:17 2011 -0700
drm/i915: add DP test request handling
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Meh'ed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Handle requests that won't fit into a single packet.
v2: pe needs to increase as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Handle requests that won't fit into a single packet.
v2: pe needs to increase as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Otherwise the next IB might start reading commands
with the page table still invalid.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The bit doesn't stick, and the output is always cloned from pipe A,
even when it's supposed to scan out from pipe B.
Shuts up annoying warnings from the modeset-rework, too.
I've noticed that with this patch we know get and unknown connection
state since the code can't find a suitable pipe for load detection.
But that beats the previous state of affairs, where it tried to use
pipe B, actually used pipe A and concluded that something is connected
(although it's the LVDS on pipe A and nothing on the VGA connector on
pipe B).
I've tried to make load detect work by remapping the pipe->planes
stuff, so that crtc 0 will use pipe B and hence we still have
something left for load-detect on pipe A. But alas, that upset the hw
a bit.
So there's still some things to figure out, but this here will at
least paper over some of the problems.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51265
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: extend the commit message a bit with recent observations.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The overlay on the i830M has a peculiar failure mode: It works the
first time around after boot-up, but consistenly hangs the second time
it's used.
Chris Wilson has dug out a nice errata:
"1.5.12 Clock Gating Disable for Display Register
Address Offset: 06200h–06203h
"Bit 3
Ovrunit Clock Gating Disable.
0 = Clock gating controlled by unit enabling logic
1 = Disable clock gating function
DevALM Errata ALM049: Overlay Clock Gating Must be Disabled: Overlay
& L2 Cache clock gating must be disabled in order to prevent device
hangs when turning off overlay.SW must turn off Ovrunit clock gating
(6200h) and L2 Cache clock gating (C8h)."
Now I've nowhere found that 0xc8 register and hence couldn't apply the
l2 cache workaround. But I've remembered that part of the magic that
the OVERLAY_ON/OFF commands are supposed to do is to rearrange cache
allocations so that the overlay scaler has some scratch space.
And while pondering how that could explain the hang the 2nd time we
enable the overlay, I've remembered that the old ums overlay code did
_not_ issue the OVERLAY_OFF cmd.
And indeed, disabling the OFF cmd results in the overlay working
flawlessly, so I guess we can workaround the lack of the above
workaround by simply never disabling the overlay engine once it's
enabled.
Note that we have the first part of the above w/a already implemented
in i830_init_clock_gating - leave that as-is to avoid surprises.
v2: Add a comment in the code.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47827
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Rhys <rhyspuk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
In theory, that function could release the lru lock between
checking for bo on ddestroy list and a successful reserve if the bo
was already reserved, and the function was called with waiting reserves
allowed.
However, all current reservers of a bo on the ddestroy list would
atomically take the bo off the list after a successful reserve so this
race should not have been hit, so no need to backport for stable.
This patch also fixes a case found by Maarten Lankhorst where
ttm_mem_evict_first called with no_wait_gpu would incorrectly
spin waiting for bo idle if trying to evict a busy buffer that
also sits on the ddestroy list.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The ttm_mem_evict_first function could theoretically drop the
lru lock without retrying if a reservation from off the LRU list
ended up waiting.
However, since currently there are no users that could cause a wait
in that situation so this is not suitable for stable
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Platform device drivers usually use the driver-private data for their
own purposes. Having it overwritten by drm_platform_init() is confusing
and error-prone.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
It's a relic of "drm: Convert proc files to seq_file and introduce debugfs",
which wrongly converted DRM_INFO + sprintf to 2 seq_printfs.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Gamari <bgamari@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The drm_gem_cma_create() function never returns NULL but rather an error
encoded in the return value using the ERR_PTR() macro. Callers therefore
need to check for errors using the IS_ERR() macro. This change allows
drivers to handle contiguous DMA allocation failures gracefully.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Acked-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
The debug message showing the resolution of a framebuffer to be
allocated is missing a closing parenthesis.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Only really required for dp 1.2. I've hoped this would help with some
link training woes I'm fighting, but alas those are only dp 1.1
devices.
Also move a comment that went misplaced in the recent refactorings to
the right spot again.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This requires a few changes since that dpcd value is above the
range currently cached by radeon. I've check the dp specs, and
above 0xf there's a big gap and nothing that looks like we should
cache it while a given device is plugged in. It's also the same value
that i915.ko uses.
Hence extend the various dpcd arrays in the radeon driver, use
proper symbolic constants where applicable (one place overallocated
the dpcd array to 25 bytes). Then also drop the rd_interval cache -
radeon_dp_link_train_init re-reads the dpcd block, so the values we'll
consume in train_cr and train_ce will always be fresh.
To avoid needless diff-churn, #define the old size of dpcd as the new
one and keep it around.
v2: Alex Deucher noticed one place where I've forgotten to replace 8
with DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Safe for the minor difference that the intel versions get an offset
into the link_status as an argument, both are the same again.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
