The problem is that executing the jobs in the right order doesn't give you the right result
because consecutive jobs executed on the same engine are pipelined.
In other words job B does it buffer read before job A has written it's result.
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
If we restrict this helper to only kms drivers (which is the case) we
can look up the correct mode easily ourselves. But it's a bit tricky:
- All legacy drivers look at crtc->hwmode. But that is updated already
at the beginning of the modeset helper, which means when we disable
a pipe. Hence the final timestamps might be a bit off. But since
this is an existing bug I'm not going to change it, but just try to
be bug-for-bug compatible with the current code. This only applies
to radeon&amdgpu.
- i915 tries to get it perfect by updating crtc->hwmode when the pipe
is off (i.e. vblank->enabled = false).
- All other atomic drivers look at crtc->state->adjusted_mode. Those
that look at state->requested_mode simply don't adjust their mode,
so it's the same. That has two problems: Accessing crtc->state from
interrupt handling code is unsafe, and it's updated before we shut
down the pipe. For nonblocking modesets it's even worse.
For atomic drivers try to implement what i915 does. To do that we add
a new hwmode field to the vblank structure, and update it from
drm_calc_timestamping_constants(). For atomic drivers that's called
from the right spot by the helper library already, so all fine. But
for safety let's enforce that.
For legacy driver this function is only called at the end (oh the
fun), which is broken, so again let's not bother and just stay
bug-for-bug compatible.
The benefit is that we can use drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos
directly to implement ->get_vblank_timestamp in every driver, deleting
a lot of code.
v2: Completely new approach, trying to mimick the i915 solution.
v3: Fixup kerneldoc.
v4: Drop the WARN_ON to check that the vblank is off, atomic helpers
currently unconditionally call this. Recomputing the same stuff should
be harmless.
v5: Fix typos and move misplaced hunks to the right patches (Neil).
v6: Undo hunk movement (kbuild).
Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170509140329.24114-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
alpha:allmodconfig fails to build as follows.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h:1006:2: error:
expected identifier before '(' token
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu.h:1011:28: error:
'NGG_BUF_MAX' undeclared here
The problem is not really the enum definition of NGG_BUF_MAX but PARAM,
which happens to be defined differently for alpha and a couple of other
architectures.
Use less generic defines for NGG enums to solve the problem.
Fixes: bce23e00f3 ("drm/amdgpu: add NGG parameters")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
if bo->shadow is NULL (race issue:BO shadow was just released
and gpu-reset kick in but BO hasn't yet) recover_vram_from_shadow
won't set @next, so the following "fence=next"
will wrongly use a fence pointer which may already dirty.
fixing it by set next to NULL prior to recover_vram_from_shadow
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou<david1.zhou@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Send the VBIOS bootup VDDC as a SOC floor voltage to SMU
before populating the PPTABLE. After DPM is enabled, This
floor voltage will be removed. This will prevent SMC from
going to Vmin upon receiving PPTable causing a violation.
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Firmware used reg set 2 for tlb invalidation. AMDGPU can start from reg
set 3 to avoid the conflict. AMDKFD will use the reg set 0 or 1 when
necesary.
Signed-off-by: Shaoyun Liu <Shaoyun.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewws-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Some of these paths probably cannot be interrupted by a signal anyway.
Those that can would fail to clean up things if they actually got
interrupted.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
export disablesmcctf to eventmgr.
need to disable temperature alert when s3/s4.
otherwise, when resume back,enable temperature
alert will fail.
Signed-off-by: Rex Zhu <Rex.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
the case could happen when gpu reset:
1. when gpu reset, cs can be continue until sw queue is full, then push job will wait with holding pd reservation.
2. gpu_reset routine will also need pd reservation to restore page table from their shadow.
3. cs is waiting for gpu_reset complete, but gpu reset is waiting for cs releases reservation.
v2: handle amdgpu_cs_submit error path.
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <David1.Zhou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
When signal interrupt happens, unpin is not called.
As a result, inside AMDGPU, the statistic of pin size will be wrong.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Either in cgs functions or for callers of cgs functions:
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour
2. There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error
3. There is no chance of deadlock in these single BO waiting
4. There is no clear benefit for interruptible waiting
5. Future caller of these functions might have same issue.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour.
2. There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
When signal interrupt happens, unpin is not called.
As a result, inside AMDGPU, the statistic of pin size will be wrong.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
1. The signal interrupt can affect the expected behaviour.
2. There is no good mechanism to handle the corresponding error.
Signed-off-by: Alex Xie <AlexBin.Xie@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
