To verify that a xattr entry is not pointing to the wrong xattr inode,
we currently check that the target inode has EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag set and
also the entry size matches the target inode size.
For stronger validation, also incorporate crc32c hash of the value into
the e_hash field. This is done regardless of whether the entry lives in
the inode body or external attribute block.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When an extended attribute block is modified, ext4_xattr_hash_entry()
recalculates e_hash for the entry that is pointed by s->here. This is
unnecessary if the modification is to remove an entry.
Currently, if the removed entry is the last one and there are other
entries remaining, hash calculation targets the just erased entry which
has been filled with zeroes and effectively does nothing. If the removed
entry is not the last one and there are more entries, this time it will
recalculate hash on the next entry which is totally unnecessary.
Fix these by moving the decision on when to recalculate hash to
ext4_xattr_set_entry().
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
New ea_inode feature allows putting large xattr values into external
inodes. struct ext4_xattr_entry and the attribute name however have to
remain in the inode extra space or external attribute block. Once that
space is exhausted, no further entries can be added. Some of that space
could also be used by values that fit in there at the time of addition.
So, a single xattr entry whose value barely fits in the external block
could prevent further entries being added.
To mitigate the problem, this patch introduces a notion of reserved
space in the external attribute block that cannot be used by value data.
This reserve is enforced when ea_inode feature is enabled. The amount
of reserve is arbitrarily chosen to be min(block_size/8, 1024). The
table below shows how much space is reserved for each block size and the
guaranteed mininum number of entries that can be placed in the external
attribute block.
block size reserved bytes entries (name length = 16)
1k 128 3
2k 256 7
4k 512 15
8k 1024 31
16k 1024 31
32k 1024 31
64k 1024 31
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Ext4 ea_inode feature allows storing xattr values in external inodes to
be able to store values that are bigger than a block in size. Ext4 also
has deduplication support for these type of inodes. With deduplication,
the actual storage waste is eliminated but the users of such inodes are
still charged full quota for the inodes as if there was no sharing
happening in the background.
This design requires ext4 to manually charge the users because the
inodes are shared.
An implication of this is that, if someone calls chown on a file that
has such references we need to transfer the quota for the file and xattr
inodes. Current dquot_transfer() function implicitly transfers one inode
charge. With ea_inode feature, we would like to transfer multiple inode
charges.
Add get_inode_usage callback which can interrogate the total number of
inodes that were charged for a given inode.
[ Applied fix from Colin King to make sure the 'ret' variable is
initialized on the successful return path. Detected by
CoverityScan, CID#1446616 ("Uninitialized scalar variable") --tytso]
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Ext4 now supports xattr values that are up to 64k in size (vfs limit).
Large xattr values are stored in external inodes each one holding a
single value. Once written the data blocks of these inodes are immutable.
The real world use cases are expected to have a lot of value duplication
such as inherited acls etc. To reduce data duplication on disk, this patch
implements a deduplicator that allows sharing of xattr inodes.
The deduplication is based on an in-memory hash lookup that is a best
effort sharing scheme. When a xattr inode is read from disk (i.e.
getxattr() call), its crc32c hash is added to a hash table. Before
creating a new xattr inode for a value being set, the hash table is
checked to see if an existing inode holds an identical value. If such an
inode is found, the ref count on that inode is incremented. On value
removal the ref count is decremented and if it reaches zero the inode is
deleted.
The quota charging for such inodes is manually managed. Every reference
holder is charged the full size as if there was no sharing happening.
This is consistent with how xattr blocks are also charged.
[ Fixed up journal credits calculation to handle inline data and the
rare case where an shared xattr block can get freed when two thread
race on breaking the xattr block sharing. --tytso ]
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
During inode deletion, the number of journal credits that will be
needed is hard to determine. For that reason we have journal
extend/restart calls in several places. Whenever a transaction is
restarted, filesystem must be in a consistent state because there is
no atomicity guarantee beyond a restart call.
Add ext4_xattr_ensure_credits() helper function which takes care of
journal extend/restart logic. It also handles getting jbd2 write
access and dirty metadata calls. This function is called at every
iteration of handling an ea_inode reference.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
IS_NOQUOTA() indicates whether quota is disabled for an inode. Ext4
also uses it to check whether an inode is for a quota file. The
distinction currently doesn't matter because quota is disabled only
for the quota files. When we start disabling quota for other inodes
in the future, we will want to make the distinction clear.
Replace IS_NOQUOTA() call with ext4_is_quota_file() at places where
we are checking for quota files.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There will be a second mb_cache instance that tracks ea_inodes. Make
existing names more explicit so that it is clear that they refer to
xattr block cache.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Make names more generic so that mbcache usage is not limited to
block sharing. In a subsequent patch in the series
("ext4: xattr inode deduplication"), we start using the mbcache code
for sharing xattr inodes. With that patch, old mb_cache_entry.e_block
field could be holding either a block number or an inode number.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Since this is a xattr specific data structure it is cleaner to keep it in
xattr header file.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Tracking struct inode * rather than the inode number eliminates the
repeated ext4_xattr_inode_iget() call later. The second call cannot
fail in practice but still requires explanation when it wants to ignore
the return value. Avoid the trouble and make things simple.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
bmap returns a dumb LBA address but not the block device that goes with
that LBA. Swapfiles don't care about this and will blindly assume that
the data volume is the correct blockdev, which is totally bogus for
files on the rt subvolume. This results in the swap code doing IOs to
arbitrary locations on the data device(!) if the passed in mapping is a
realtime file, so just turn off bmap for rt files.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Both ext4_set_acl() and ext4_set_context() need to be made aware of
ea_inode feature when it comes to credits calculation.
Also add a sufficient credits check in ext4_xattr_set_handle() right
after xattr write lock is grabbed. Original credits calculation is done
outside the lock so there is a possiblity that the initially calculated
credits are not sufficient anymore.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In a few places the function returns without trying to pass the actual
error code to the caller. Fix those.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When value size is <= EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(), and it
doesn't fit in either inline or xattr block, a second try is made to
store it in an external inode while storing the entry itself in inline
area. There should also be an attempt to store the entry in xattr block.
This patch adds a retry loop to do that. It also makes the caller the
sole decider on whether to store a value in an external inode.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When there is no space for a value in xattr block, it may be stored
in an xattr inode even if the value length is less than
EXT4_XATTR_MIN_LARGE_EA_SIZE(). So the current assumption in credits
calculation is wrong.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When a xattr entry refers to an external inode, the value data is not
available in the inline area so we should not attempt to read it using
value offset.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When moving xattr entries from inline area to a xattr block, entries
that refer to external xattr inodes need special handling because
value data is not available in the inline area but rather should be
read from its external inode.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_xattr_make_inode_space() is interested in calculating the inline
space used in an inode. When a xattr entry refers to an external inode
the value size indicates the external inode size, not the value size in
the inline area. Change the function to take this into account.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_xattr_value_same() is used as a quick optimization in case the new
xattr value is identical to the previous value. When xattr value is
stored in a xattr inode the check becomes expensive so it is better to
just assume that they are not equal.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Two places in code missed converting xattr inode number using
le32_to_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The input and output values of *size parameter are equal on successful
return from ext4_xattr_inode_get(). On error return, the callers ignore
the output value so there is no need to update it.
Also check for NULL return from ext4_bread(). If the actual xattr inode
size happens to be smaller than the expected size, ext4_bread() may
return NULL which would indicate data corruption.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
In general, kernel functions indicate success/failure through their return
values. This function returns the status as an output parameter and reserves
the return value for the inode. Make it follow the general convention.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
EXT4_XATTR_MAX_LARGE_EA_SIZE definition in ext4 is currently unused.
Besides, vfs enforces its own 64k limit which makes the 1MB limit in
ext4 redundant. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The ref count on ea_inode is incremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_orphan_add() which is supposed to be decremented by
ext4_xattr_inode_array_free(). The decrement is conditioned on whether
the ea_inode is currently on the orphan list. However, the orphan list
addition only happens when journaling is enabled. In non-journaled case,r
we fail to release the ref count causing an error message like below.
"VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of sdb. Self-destruct in 5 seconds.
Have a nice day..."
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ea_inode contents are treated as metadata, that's why it is journaled
during initial writes. Failing to call revoke during freeing could cause
user data to be overwritten with original ea_inode contents during journal
replay.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Quota charging is based on the ownership of the inode. Currently, the
xattr inode owner is set to the caller which may be different from the
parent inode owner. This is inconsistent with how quota is charged for
xattr block and regular data block writes.
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We don't need acls on xattr inodes because they are not directly
accessible from user mode.
Besides lockdep complains about recursive locking of xattr_sem as seen
below.
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
4.11.0-rc8+ #402 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
python/1894 is trying to acquire lock:
(&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804878a6>] ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
but task is already holding lock:
(&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
3 locks held by python/1894:
#0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d829f>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803dda27>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
#2: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff80489500>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0xa0/0x5d0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 1894 Comm: python Not tainted 4.11.0-rc8+ #402
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x67/0x99
__lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1830
lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
down_read+0x2f/0x60
ext4_xattr_get+0x66/0x270
ext4_get_acl+0x43/0x1e0
get_acl+0x72/0xf0
posix_acl_create+0x5e/0x170
ext4_init_acl+0x21/0xc0
__ext4_new_inode+0xffd/0x16b0
ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x5ea/0xb70
ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b5/0x970
ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x351/0x5d0
ext4_xattr_set+0x124/0x180
ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
__vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
setxattr+0x129/0x160
path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Setting a large xattr value may require writing the attribute contents
to an external inode. In this case we may need to lock the xattr inode
along with the parent inode. This doesn't pose a deadlock risk because
xattr inodes are not directly visible to the user and their access is
restricted.
Assign a lockdep subclass to xattr inode's lock.
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
4.12.0-rc1+ #740 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
python/1822 is trying to acquire lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff804912ca>] ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0
but task is already holding lock:
(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);
lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by python/1822:
#0: (sb_writers#10){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff803d0eef>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x50
#1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff803d6687>] vfs_setxattr+0x57/0xb0
#2: (jbd2_handle){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff80493f40>] start_this_handle+0xf0/0x420
#3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff804920ba>] ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x9a/0x4f0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 1822 Comm: python Not tainted 4.12.0-rc1+ #740
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x67/0x9e
__lock_acquire+0x5f3/0x1750
lock_acquire+0xb5/0x1d0
down_write+0x2c/0x60
ext4_xattr_set_entry+0x65a/0x7b0
ext4_xattr_block_set+0x1b2/0x9b0
ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x322/0x4f0
ext4_xattr_set+0x144/0x1a0
ext4_xattr_user_set+0x34/0x40
__vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x69/0x1c0
vfs_setxattr+0xa2/0xb0
setxattr+0x12e/0x150
path_setxattr+0x87/0xb0
SyS_setxattr+0xf/0x20
entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xad
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Large xattr support is implemented for EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE.
If the size of an xattr value is larger than will fit in a single
external block, then the xattr value will be saved into the body
of an external xattr inode.
The also helps support a larger number of xattr, since only the headers
will be stored in the in-inode space or the single external block.
The inode is referenced from the xattr header via "e_value_inum",
which was formerly "e_value_block", but that field was never used.
The e_value_size still contains the xattr size so that listing
xattrs does not need to look up the inode if the data is not accessed.
struct ext4_xattr_entry {
__u8 e_name_len; /* length of name */
__u8 e_name_index; /* attribute name index */
__le16 e_value_offs; /* offset in disk block of value */
__le32 e_value_inum; /* inode in which value is stored */
__le32 e_value_size; /* size of attribute value */
__le32 e_hash; /* hash value of name and value */
char e_name[0]; /* attribute name */
};
The xattr inode is marked with the EXT4_EA_INODE_FL flag and also
holds a back-reference to the owning inode in its i_mtime field,
allowing the ext4/e2fsck to verify the correct inode is accessed.
[ Applied fix by Dan Carpenter to avoid freeing an ERR_PTR. ]
Lustre-Jira: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-80
Lustre-bugzilla: https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4424
Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah <kalpak.shah@sun.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
This INCOMPAT_LARGEDIR feature allows larger directories to be created
in ldiskfs, both with directory sizes over 2GB and and a maximum htree
depth of 3 instead of the current limit of 2. These features are needed
in order to exceed the current limit of approximately 10M entries in a
single directory.
This patch was originally written by Yang Sheng to support the Lustre server.
[ Bumped the credits needed to update an indexed directory -- tytso ]
Signed-off-by: Liang Zhen <liang.zhen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Sheng <yang.sheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@seagate.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>
Two entries being added at the same time to the IFLA
policy table, whilst parallel bug fixes to decnet
routing dst handling overlapping with the dst gc removal
in net-next.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Pull more ufs fixes from Al Viro:
"More UFS fixes, unfortunately including build regression fix for the
64-bit s_dsize commit. Fixed in this pile:
- trivial bug in signedness of 32bit timestamps on ufs1
- ESTALE instead of ufs_error() when doing open-by-fhandle on
something deleted
- build regression on 32bit in ufs_new_fragments() - calculating that
many percents of u64 pulls libgcc stuff on some of those. Mea
culpa.
- fix hysteresis loop broken by typo in 2.4.14.7 (right next to the
location of previous bug).
- fix the insane limits of said hysteresis loop on filesystems with
very low percentage of reserved blocks. If it's 5% or less, just
use the OPTSPACE policy.
- calculate those limits once and mount time.
This tree does pass xfstests clean (both ufs1 and ufs2) and it _does_
survive cross-builds.
Again, my apologies for missing that, especially since I have noticed
a related percentage-of-64bit issue in earlier patches (when dealing
with amount of reserved blocks). Self-LART applied..."
* 'ufs-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs:
ufs: fix the logics for tail relocation
ufs_iget(): fail with -ESTALE on deleted inode
fix signedness of timestamps on ufs1
btrfs_del_root_ref calls btrfs_search_slot and reads name from root_ref.
Call btrfs_is_name_len_valid before memcmp.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In btrfs_get_name, there's btrfs_search_slot and reads name from
inode_ref/root_ref.
Call btrfs_is_name_len_valid in btrfs_get_name.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since iterate_dir_item checks name_len in its own way,
so use btrfs_is_name_len_valid not 'verify_dir_item' to make more strict
name_len check.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ switched ENAMETOOLONG to EIO ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In btrfs_log_inode, btrfs_search_forward gets the buffer and then
btrfs_check_ref_name_override will read name from ref/extref for the
first time.
Call btrfs_is_name_len_valid before reading name.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
replay_xattr_deletes calls btrfs_search_slot to get buffer and reads
name.
Call verify_dir_item to check name_len in replay_xattr_deletes to avoid
reading out of boundary.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
replay_one_buffer first reads buffers and dispatches items accroding to
the item type.
In this patch, add_inode_ref handles inode_ref and inode_extref.
Then add_inode_ref calls ref_get_fields and extref_get_fields to read
ref/extref name for the first time.
So checking name_len before reading those two is fine.
add_inode_ref also calls inode_in_dir to match ref/extref in parent_dir.
The call graph includes btrfs_match_dir_item_name to read dir_item name
in the parent dir.
Checking first dir_item is not enough. Change it to verify every
dir_item while doing matches.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Introduce function btrfs_is_name_len_valid.
The function compares parameter @name_len with item boundary then
returns true if name_len is valid.
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ s/btrfs_leaf_data/BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_OFFSET/ ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We should really just wait in wait_dev_flush and let the caller decide
what to do with the error value.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Similar to what submit_bio_wait does, we should account for IO while
waiting for a bio completion. This has marginal visible effects, flush
bio is short-lived.
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For devices that support flushing, we allocate a bio, submit, wait for
it and then free it. The bio allocation does not fail so ENOMEM is not a
problem but we still may unnecessarily stress the allocation subsystem.
Instead, we can allocate the bio at the same time we allocate the device
and reuse it each time we need to flush the barriers. The bio is reset
before each use. Reference counting is simplified to just device
allocation (get) and freeing (put).
The bio used to be submitted through the integrity checker which will
find out that bio has no data attached and call submit_bio.
Status of the bio in flight needs to be tracked separately in case the
device caches get switched off between write and wait.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
An incremental send can contain unlink operations with an invalid target
path when we rename some directory inode A, then rename some file inode B
to the old name of inode A and directory inode A is an ancestor of inode B
in the parent snapshot (but not anymore in the send snapshot).
Consider the following example scenario where this issue happens.
Parent snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|
|--- dir1/ (ino 257)
|--- dir2/ (ino 258)
| |--- file1 (ino 259)
| |--- file3 (ino 261)
|
|--- dir3/ (ino 262)
|--- file22 (ino 260)
|--- dir4/ (ino 263)
Send snapshot:
. (ino 256)
|
|--- dir1/ (ino 257)
|--- dir2/ (ino 258)
|--- dir3 (ino 260)
|--- file3/ (ino 262)
|--- dir4/ (ino 263)
|--- file11 (ino 269)
|--- file33 (ino 261)
When attempting to apply the corresponding incremental send stream, an
unlink operation contains an invalid path which makes the receiver fail.
The following is verbose output of the btrfs receive command:
receiving snapshot snap2 uuid=7d5450da-a573-e043-a451-ec85f4879f0f (...)
utimes
utimes dir1
utimes dir1/dir2
link dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 -> dir1/dir2/file1
unlink dir1/dir2/file1
utimes dir1/dir2
truncate dir1/dir3/dir4/file11 size=0
utimes dir1/dir3/dir4/file11
rename dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0
link dir1/dir3 -> o262-7-0/file22
unlink dir1/dir3/file22
ERROR: unlink dir1/dir3/file22 failed. Not a directory
The following steps happen during the computation of the incremental send
stream the lead to this issue:
1) Before we start processing the new and deleted references for inode
260, we compute the full path of the deleted reference
("dir1/dir3/file22") and cache it in the list of deleted references
for our inode.
2) We then start processing the new references for inode 260, for which
there is only one new, located at "dir1/dir3". When processing this
new reference, we check that inode 262, which was not yet processed,
collides with the new reference and because of that we orphanize
inode 262 so its new full path becomes "o262-7-0".
3) After the orphanization of inode 262, we create the new reference for
inode 260 by issuing a link command with a target path of "dir1/dir3"
and a source path of "o262-7-0/file22".
4) We then start processing the deleted references for inode 260, for
which there is only one with the base name of "file22", and issue
an unlink operation containing the target path computed at step 1,
which is wrong because that path no longer exists and should be
replaced with "o262-7-0/file22".
So fix this issue by recomputing the full path of deleted references if
when we processed the new references for an inode we ended up orphanizing
any other inode that is an ancestor of our inode in the parent snapshot.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[ adjusted after prev patch removed fs_path::dir_path and dir_path_len ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently an incremental snapshot can generate link operations which
contain an invalid target path. Such case happens when in the send
snapshot a file was renamed, a new hard link added for it and some
other inode (with a lower number) got renamed to the former name of
that file. Example:
Parent snapshot
. (ino 256)
|
|--- f1 (ino 257)
|--- f2 (ino 258)
|--- f3 (ino 259)
Send snapshot
. (ino 256)
|
|--- f2 (ino 257)
|--- f3 (ino 258)
|--- f4 (ino 259)
|--- f5 (ino 258)
The following steps happen when computing the incremental send stream:
1) When processing inode 257, inode 258 is orphanized (renamed to
"o258-7-0"), because its current reference has the same name as the
new reference for inode 257;
2) When processing inode 258, we iterate over all its new references,
which have the names "f3" and "f5". The first iteration sees name
"f5" and renames the inode from its orphan name ("o258-7-0") to
"f5", while the second iteration sees the name "f3" and, incorrectly,
issues a link operation with a target name matching the orphan name,
which no longer exists. The first iteration had reset the current
valid path of the inode to "f5", but in the second iteration we lost
it because we found another inode, with a higher number of 259, which
has a reference named "f3" as well, so we orphanized inode 259 and
recomputed the current valid path of inode 258 to its old orphan
name because inode 259 could be an ancestor of inode 258 and therefore
the current valid path could contain the pre-orphanization name of
inode 259. However in this case inode 259 is not an ancestor of inode
258 so the current valid path should not be recomputed.
This makes the receiver fail with the following error:
ERROR: link f3 -> o258-7-0 failed: No such file or directory
So fix this by not recomputing the current valid path for an inode
whenever we find a colliding reference from some not yet processed inode
(inode number higher then the one currently being processed), unless
that other inode is an ancestor of the one we are currently processing.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
While punching a hole in a range that is not aligned with the sector size
(currently the same as the page size) we can end up leaving an extent map
in memory with a length that is smaller then the sector size or with a
start offset that is not aligned to the sector size. Both cases are not
expected and can lead to problems. This issue is easily detected
after the patch from commit a7e3b975a0 ("Btrfs: fix reported number of
inode blocks"), introduced in kernel 4.12-rc1, in a scenario like the
following for example:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xaa -b 100K 0 100K" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "fpunch 60K 90K" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb -b 100K 50K 100K" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc -b 50K 100K 50K" /mnt/foo
$ umount /mnt
After the unmount operation we can see several warnings emmitted due to
underflows related to space reservation counters:
[ 2837.443299] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2837.447395] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 2474 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9444 btrfs_destroy_inode+0xe8/0x27e [btrfs]
[ 2837.452108] Modules linked in: dm_flakey dm_mod ppdev parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm_tis_core i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev tpm button se
rio_raw sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache btrfs raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_gene
ric raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy
[ 2837.458389] CPU: 8 PID: 2474 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc8-btrfs-next-43+ #1
[ 2837.459754] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 2837.462379] Call Trace:
[ 2837.462379] dump_stack+0x68/0x92
[ 2837.462379] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[ 2837.462379] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[ 2837.462379] btrfs_destroy_inode+0xe8/0x27e [btrfs]
[ 2837.462379] destroy_inode+0x3d/0x55
[ 2837.462379] evict+0x177/0x17e
[ 2837.462379] dispose_list+0x50/0x71
[ 2837.462379] evict_inodes+0x132/0x141
[ 2837.462379] generic_shutdown_super+0x3f/0xeb
[ 2837.462379] kill_anon_super+0x12/0x1c
[ 2837.462379] btrfs_kill_super+0x16/0x21 [btrfs]
[ 2837.462379] deactivate_locked_super+0x30/0x68
[ 2837.462379] deactivate_super+0x36/0x39
[ 2837.462379] cleanup_mnt+0x58/0x76
[ 2837.462379] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x14
[ 2837.462379] task_work_run+0x77/0x9b
[ 2837.462379] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x9d/0xc5
[ 2837.462379] syscall_return_slowpath+0x196/0x1b9
[ 2837.462379] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xab/0xad
[ 2837.462379] RIP: 0033:0x7f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.462379] RSP: 002b:00007ffdd0d8de58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 2837.462379] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000556f76a39060 RCX: 00007f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.462379] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000556f76a3f910
[ 2837.462379] RBP: 0000556f76a3f910 R08: 0000556f76a3e670 R09: 0000000000000015
[ 2837.462379] R10: 00000000000006b4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f3ef436ce64
[ 2837.462379] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000556f76a39240 R15: 00007ffdd0d8e0e0
[ 2837.519355] ---[ end trace e79345fe24b30b8d ]---
[ 2837.596256] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2837.597625] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 2474 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5699 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x246/0x3eb [btrfs]
[ 2837.603547] Modules linked in: dm_flakey dm_mod ppdev parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm_tis_core i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev tpm button serio_raw sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache btrfs raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy
[ 2837.659372] CPU: 8 PID: 2474 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc8-btrfs-next-43+ #1
[ 2837.663359] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 2837.663359] Call Trace:
[ 2837.663359] dump_stack+0x68/0x92
[ 2837.663359] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[ 2837.663359] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[ 2837.663359] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x246/0x3eb [btrfs]
[ 2837.663359] close_ctree+0x1dd/0x2e1 [btrfs]
[ 2837.663359] ? evict_inodes+0x132/0x141
[ 2837.663359] btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
[ 2837.663359] generic_shutdown_super+0x6a/0xeb
[ 2837.663359] kill_anon_super+0x12/0x1c
[ 2837.663359] btrfs_kill_super+0x16/0x21 [btrfs]
[ 2837.663359] deactivate_locked_super+0x30/0x68
[ 2837.663359] deactivate_super+0x36/0x39
[ 2837.663359] cleanup_mnt+0x58/0x76
[ 2837.663359] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x14
[ 2837.663359] task_work_run+0x77/0x9b
[ 2837.663359] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x9d/0xc5
[ 2837.663359] syscall_return_slowpath+0x196/0x1b9
[ 2837.663359] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xab/0xad
[ 2837.663359] RIP: 0033:0x7f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.663359] RSP: 002b:00007ffdd0d8de58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 2837.663359] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000556f76a39060 RCX: 00007f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.663359] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000556f76a3f910
[ 2837.663359] RBP: 0000556f76a3f910 R08: 0000556f76a3e670 R09: 0000000000000015
[ 2837.663359] R10: 00000000000006b4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f3ef436ce64
[ 2837.663359] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000556f76a39240 R15: 00007ffdd0d8e0e0
[ 2837.739445] ---[ end trace e79345fe24b30b8e ]---
[ 2837.745595] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2837.746412] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 2474 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5700 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x261/0x3eb [btrfs]
[ 2837.747955] Modules linked in: dm_flakey dm_mod ppdev parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm_tis_core i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev tpm button serio_raw sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache btrfs raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy
[ 2837.755395] CPU: 8 PID: 2474 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc8-btrfs-next-43+ #1
[ 2837.756769] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 2837.758526] Call Trace:
[ 2837.758925] dump_stack+0x68/0x92
[ 2837.759383] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[ 2837.759383] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[ 2837.759383] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x261/0x3eb [btrfs]
[ 2837.759383] close_ctree+0x1dd/0x2e1 [btrfs]
[ 2837.759383] ? evict_inodes+0x132/0x141
[ 2837.759383] btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
[ 2837.759383] generic_shutdown_super+0x6a/0xeb
[ 2837.759383] kill_anon_super+0x12/0x1c
[ 2837.759383] btrfs_kill_super+0x16/0x21 [btrfs]
[ 2837.759383] deactivate_locked_super+0x30/0x68
[ 2837.759383] deactivate_super+0x36/0x39
[ 2837.759383] cleanup_mnt+0x58/0x76
[ 2837.759383] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x14
[ 2837.759383] task_work_run+0x77/0x9b
[ 2837.759383] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x9d/0xc5
[ 2837.759383] syscall_return_slowpath+0x196/0x1b9
[ 2837.759383] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xab/0xad
[ 2837.759383] RIP: 0033:0x7f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.759383] RSP: 002b:00007ffdd0d8de58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 2837.759383] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000556f76a39060 RCX: 00007f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.759383] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000556f76a3f910
[ 2837.759383] RBP: 0000556f76a3f910 R08: 0000556f76a3e670 R09: 0000000000000015
[ 2837.759383] R10: 00000000000006b4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f3ef436ce64
[ 2837.759383] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000556f76a39240 R15: 00007ffdd0d8e0e0
[ 2837.777063] ---[ end trace e79345fe24b30b8f ]---
[ 2837.778235] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 2837.778856] WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 2474 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9825 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x348/0x3eb [btrfs]
[ 2837.791385] Modules linked in: dm_flakey dm_mod ppdev parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis tpm_tis_core i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev tpm button serio_raw sunrpc loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache btrfs raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c crc32c_generic raid1 raid0 multipath linear md_mod sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy
[ 2837.797711] CPU: 8 PID: 2474 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc8-btrfs-next-43+ #1
[ 2837.798594] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.9.1-0-gb3ef39f-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[ 2837.800118] Call Trace:
[ 2837.800515] dump_stack+0x68/0x92
[ 2837.801015] __warn+0xc2/0xdd
[ 2837.801471] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f
[ 2837.801698] btrfs_free_block_groups+0x348/0x3eb [btrfs]
[ 2837.801698] close_ctree+0x1dd/0x2e1 [btrfs]
[ 2837.801698] ? evict_inodes+0x132/0x141
[ 2837.801698] btrfs_put_super+0x15/0x17 [btrfs]
[ 2837.801698] generic_shutdown_super+0x6a/0xeb
[ 2837.801698] kill_anon_super+0x12/0x1c
[ 2837.801698] btrfs_kill_super+0x16/0x21 [btrfs]
[ 2837.801698] deactivate_locked_super+0x30/0x68
[ 2837.801698] deactivate_super+0x36/0x39
[ 2837.801698] cleanup_mnt+0x58/0x76
[ 2837.801698] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x14
[ 2837.801698] task_work_run+0x77/0x9b
[ 2837.801698] prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x9d/0xc5
[ 2837.801698] syscall_return_slowpath+0x196/0x1b9
[ 2837.801698] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xab/0xad
[ 2837.801698] RIP: 0033:0x7f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.801698] RSP: 002b:00007ffdd0d8de58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
[ 2837.801698] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000556f76a39060 RCX: 00007f3ef3e6b9a7
[ 2837.801698] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000556f76a3f910
[ 2837.801698] RBP: 0000556f76a3f910 R08: 0000556f76a3e670 R09: 0000000000000015
[ 2837.801698] R10: 00000000000006b4 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f3ef436ce64
[ 2837.801698] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000556f76a39240 R15: 00007ffdd0d8e0e0
[ 2837.818441] ---[ end trace e79345fe24b30b90 ]---
[ 2837.818991] BTRFS info (device sdc): space_info 1 has 7974912 free, is not full
[ 2837.819830] BTRFS info (device sdc): space_info total=8388608, used=417792, pinned=0, reserved=0, may_use=18446744073709547520, readonly=0
What happens in the above example is the following:
1) When punching the hole, at btrfs_punch_hole(), the variable tail_len
is set to 2048 (as tail_start is 148Kb + 1 and offset + len is 150Kb).
This results in the creation of an extent map with a length of 2Kb
starting at file offset 148Kb, through find_first_non_hole() ->
btrfs_get_extent().
2) The second write (first write after the hole punch operation), sets
the range [50Kb, 152Kb[ to delalloc.
3) The third write, at btrfs_find_new_delalloc_bytes(), sees the extent
map covering the range [148Kb, 150Kb[ and ends up calling
set_extent_bit() for the same range, which results in splitting an
existing extent state record, covering the range [148Kb, 152Kb[ into
two 2Kb extent state records, covering the ranges [148Kb, 150Kb[ and
[150Kb, 152Kb[.
4) Finally at lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(), immediately after calling
btrfs_find_new_delalloc_bytes() we clear the delalloc bit from the
range [100Kb, 152Kb[ which results in the btrfs_clear_bit_hook()
callback being invoked against the two 2Kb extent state records that
cover the ranges [148Kb, 150Kb[ and [150Kb, 152Kb[. When called against
the first 2Kb extent state, it calls btrfs_delalloc_release_metadata()
with a length argument of 2048 bytes. That function rounds up the length
to a sector size aligned length, so it ends up considering a length of
4096 bytes, and then calls calc_csum_metadata_size() which results in
decrementing the inode's csum_bytes counter by 4096 bytes, so after
it stays a value of 0 bytes. Then the same happens when
btrfs_clear_bit_hook() is called against the second extent state that
has a length of 2Kb, covering the range [150Kb, 152Kb[, the length is
rounded up to 4096 and calc_csum_metadata_size() ends up being called
to decrement 4096 bytes from the inode's csum_bytes counter, which
at that time has a value of 0, leading to an underflow, which is
exactly what triggers the first warning, at btrfs_destroy_inode().
All the other warnings relate to several space accounting counters
that underflow as well due to similar reasons.
A similar case but where the hole punching operation creates an extent map
with a start offset not aligned to the sector size is the following:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ xfs_io -f -c "fpunch 695K 820K" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 1008K 307K" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb -b 630K 1073K 630K" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc -b 459K 1068K 459K" $SCRATCH_MNT/bar
$ umount /mnt
During the unmount operation we get similar traces for the same reasons as
in the first example.
So fix the hole punching operation to make sure it never creates extent
maps with a length that is not aligned to the sector size nor with a start
offset that is not aligned to the sector size, as this breaks all
assumptions and it's a land mine.
Fixes: d77815461f ("btrfs: Avoid trucating page or punching hole in a already existed hole.")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
