The simple RX resync strategy controlled by the kernel does not
guarantee as good results as if the device helps by detecting
the potential record boundaries and keeping track of them.
We've called this strategy stream scan in the tls-offload doc.
Implement this strategy for the NFP. The device sends a request
for record boundary confirmation, which is then recorded in
per-TLS socket state and responded to once record is reached.
Because the device keeps track of records passing after the
request was sent the response is not as latency sensitive as
when kernel just tries to tell the device the information
about the next record.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We need to do our best not to drop delete commands, otherwise
we will have stale entries in the connection table. Ignore
the control message queue limits for delete commands.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Some control messages must be sent from atomic context. The mailbox
takes sleeping locks and uses a waitqueue so add a "posted" version
of communication.
Trylock the semaphore and if that's successful kick of the device
communication. The device communication will be completed from
a workqueue, which will also release the semaphore.
If locks are taken queue the message and return. Schedule a
different workqueue to take the semaphore and run the communication.
Note that the there are currently no atomic users which would actually
need the return value, so all replies to posted messages are just
freed.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
FW may prefer to handle some communication via a mailbox
or the vNIC may simply not have a control queue (VFs).
Add a way of exchanging ccm-compatible messages via a
mailbox.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
BPF's control message handler seems like a good base to built
on for request-reply control messages. Split it out to allow
for reuse.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <dirk.vandermerwe@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
