When IRQ chip is instantiated via GPIO library flow, the few functions,
in particular the ACPI event registration mechanism, on some of ACPI based
platforms expect that the pin ranges are initialized to that point.
Add GPIO <-> pin mapping ranges via callback in the GPIO library flow.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Add implementation for:
- pin control, group information retrieval: count, name and pins
- pin muxing:
- function information (count, name and groups)
- mux setting
- GPIO control (enable, disable, set direction)
- pin configuration:
- pull disable, up and down
- any other option is treated as not supported.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
There is nothing wrong with requesting pin that owned by ACPI.
The only difference is how interrupt status will be reflected.
It means that in ACPI mode we may not use pin as GPIO-backed IRQ.
Taking above into consideration, move the check from GPIO to IRQ chip
callback.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
There is no need to keep pointer to struct platform_device, which is container
of struct device, because the latter is what have been used everywhere outside
of ->probe() path. In any case we may derive pointer to the container when
needed.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
A pin in native mode still can be requested as GPIO, though we assume
that firmware has configured it properly, which sometimes is not the case.
Here we allow turning the pin as GPIO to avoid potential issues,
but issue warning that something might be wrong.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The pattern
foo = kmalloc(sizeof(*foo), GFP_KERNEL);
has an advantage when foo type is changed. Since we are planning a such,
better to be prepared by using standard pattern for memory allocation.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
The Intel Lynxpoint pinctrl driver implements irqchip callbacks which are
called with desc->lock raw_spinlock held. In mainline this is fine because
spinlock resolves to raw_spinlock. However, running the same code in -rt
we will get a BUG() asserted.
This is because in -rt spinlocks are preemptible so taking the driver
private spinlock in irqchip callbacks causes might_sleep() to trigger.
In order to keep -rt happy but at the same time make sure that register
accesses get serialized, convert the driver to use raw_spinlock instead.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
