These two flags are used for the same purpose, just
combine them into a no-ir flag to annotate no initiating
radiation is allowed.
Old userspace sending either flag will have it treated as
the no-ir flag. To be considerate to older userspace we
also send both the no-ir flag and the old no-ibss flags.
Newer userspace will have to be aware of older kernels.
Update all places in the tree using these flags with the
following semantic patch:
@@
@@
-NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
@@
@@
-IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
@@
@@
-NL80211_RRF_NO_IR | NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR | IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
@@
@@
-(NL80211_RRF_NO_IR)
+NL80211_RRF_NO_IR
@@
@@
-(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR)
+IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR
Along with some hand-optimisations in documentation, to
remove duplicates and to fix some indentation.
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
[do all the driver updates in one go]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Due to a typo, the current code copies only sizeof(cmd->channels_2)
bytes, which is smaller than the correct sizeof(cmd->channels_5)
size, resulting in a partial scan (some channels are skipped).
Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Allow configuring different dwell times to the different
scan types (regular and scheduled).
Add new configuration entry (dwell_time_dfs) to
conf_scan_settings, in order to allow setting
different values for normal scan and scheduled scan.
Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
The scan APIs of 12xx and 18xx are totally different.
Use some common functions as much as possible (e.g.
for setting scan channels), but split scan.c into
chip-specific scan.c files, each implementing its
own scan mechanism.
(in other words - move most of the current wlcore's
scan.c into wl12xx, and implement a similar mechanism
in 18xx, according to the new api)
New wlcore ops are introduced in order to call the
chip-specific scan functions.
The template indices used for each scan (regular/scheduled)
are also different between the chips, so set the correct
indices used for each scan type after identifying the chip.
Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
