Commit b5413e6b22 removed all uses of chan_num in mwifiex_config_scan().
Compiling mwifiex with W=1 gives the following warning, fix it.
mwifiex/scan.c: In function ‘mwifiex_config_scan’:
mwifiex/scan.c:830:6: warning: variable ‘chan_num’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Fixes: b5413e6b22 ("mwifiex: increase the number of nodes in command pool")
Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirtika Ruchandani <kirtika@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
This patch:
- improves code layout
- removes a useless memset(0) for some memory allocated with kzalloc
- removes a useless if. We know that 'if (chan_band_tlv)' will succeed
because it has been tested a few lines above
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
This patch advertises RANDOM_MAC_ADDR feature to cfg80211. It allow the
application to issue scan with a MAC address and mask. Random MACs are
generated and used in probe requests sent for scanning until it is changed
by the application or device is restarted.
Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Kalle Valo says:
====================
wireless-drivers-next patches for 4.8
Major changes:
iwlwifi
* more work on the RX path for the 9000 device series
* some more dynamic queue allocation work
* SAR BIOS implementation
* some work on debugging capabilities
* added support for GCMP encryption
* data path rework in preparation for new HW
* some cleanup to remove transport dependency on mac80211
* support for MSIx in preparation for new HW
* lots of work in preparation for HW support (9000 and a000 series)
mwifiex
* implement get_tx_power and get_antenna cfg80211 operation callbacks
wl18xx
* add support for 64bit clock
rtl8xxxu
* aggregation support (optional for now)
Also wireless-drivers is merged to fix some conflicts.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The flag should be cleaned along with other scan operation variables.
This was missing at some places.
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Beacon report radio measurement requires reporting observed BSSs
on the channels specified in the beacon request. If the measurement
mode is set to passive or active, it requires actually performing a
scan (passive or active, accordingly), and reporting the time that
the scan was started and the time each beacon/probe was received
(both in terms of TSF of the BSS of the requesting AP). If the
request mode is table, this information is optional.
In addition, the radio measurement request specifies the channel
dwell time for the measurement.
In order to use scan for beacon report when the mode is active or
passive, add a parameter to scan request that specifies the
channel dwell time, and add scan start time and beacon received time
to scan results information.
Supporting beacon report is required for Multi Band Operation (MBO).
Signed-off-by: Assaf Krauss <assaf.krauss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David Spinadel <david.spinadel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Avraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This patch creates common function mwifiex_cancel_scan to remove
duplication of code.
Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
As 2.4Ghz channels are overlapping, sometimes AP responds to
probe request even if it's operating on neighbouring channel.
Currently firmware drops those scan entries, as current channel
doesn't match with APs channel.
This patch enables MWIFIEX_DISABLE_CHAN_FILT flag in scan
command to disable the feature so that better scan results
will be received in 2.4Ghz band.
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Releasing the scan_pending lock in mwifiex_check_next_scan_command
introduces a short window where pending scan commands can be removed
or added before removing them all in mwifiex_cancel_pending_scan_cmd.
I think this is safe, since the worst thing to happen is that a
pending scan cmd is removed by the command handler. Adding new scan
commands is not possible while one is pending, see scan_processing flag.
Since all commands are removed from the queue anyway, we don't care if
some commands are removed by a different code path earlier, the final
state remains the same.
I assume, that the critical section needed for the check has been
extended over clearing the pending scan queue out of convenience. The
lock was already held and releasing it and grab it again was just
more work. It doesn't seem to be necessary because of concurrency.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
given this structure:
struct foo {
struct bar {
int baz;
}
}
these accesses are equivalent:
(*(foo->bar)).baz
foo->bar->baz
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fenkart <afenkart@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
This enum is already perfectly aliased to enum nl80211_band, and
the only reason for it is that we get IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS out of
it. There's no really good reason to not declare the number of
bands in nl80211 though, so do that and remove the cfg80211 one.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
This patch adds support for waking up the device on
finding better RSSI. Threshold RSSI value will be
configured by application.
Signed-off-by: Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
This patch add sched scan support for mwifiex, include cfg80211
sched_scan_start/sched_scan_stop handler, corresponding bgscan
command path and event handler.
Signed-off-by: Xinming Hu <huxm@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: chunfan chen <jeffc@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Cathy Luo <cluo@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
