Two warnings are produced by gcc (tested with gcc 6.2.1):
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c: In function ‘csr_load_work_fn’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c:400:5: error: ‘fw’ is used
uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
if (fw)
^
and
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h:47:0,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c:30:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c: In function ‘intel_guc_init’:
./include/drm/drmP.h:228:2: error: ‘fw’ may be used uninitialized in this
function -Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drm_printk(KERN_DEBUG, DRM_UT_DRIVER, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
^~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c:595:25: note: ‘fw’ was declared here
const struct firmware *fw;
^~
When CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR is set, those warnings break the build.
Initializing fw pointer to NULL in both cases removes the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Jérémy Lefaure <jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20161128234319.20800-1-jeremy.lefaure@lse.epita.fr
Backmerge the 4.8 pull request state from Dave - conflicts were
getting out of hand, and Chris has some patches which outright don't
apply without everything merged together again.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Since drm_i915_private is now a subclass of drm_device we do not need to
chase the drm_i915_private->dev backpointer and can instead simply
access drm_i915_private->drm directly.
text data bss dec hex filename
1068757 4565 416 1073738 10624a drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1066949 4565 416 1071930 105b3a drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Created by the coccinelle script:
@@
struct drm_i915_private *d;
identifier i;
@@
(
- d->dev->i
+ d->drm.i
|
- d->dev
+ &d->drm
)
and for good measure the dev_priv->dev backpointer was removed entirely.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467711623-2905-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
While we disable runtime PM and with that display power well support if
the DMC firmware isn't loaded, we still want to disable power wells
during system suspend and driver unload. So drop/reacquire the
corresponding power refcount during suspend/resume and driver unloading.
This also means we have to check if DMC is not loaded and skip enabling
DC states in the power well code.
v2:
- Reuse intel_csr_ucode_suspend() in intel_csr_ucode_fini() instead of
opencoding the former. (Chris)
- Add docbook comment to the public resume and suspend functions.
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460980101-14713-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
In commit 1e657ad7 we moved the last step of firmware initialization to
skl_display_core_init(), where it will be run only during system resume,
but not during driver loading. Since this init step needs to be done
whenever we program the firmware fix this by moving the initialization
to the end of intel_csr_load_program().
While at it simplify a bit csr_load_work_fn().
This issue prevented DC5/6 transitions, this change will re-enable those.
v2:
- remove debugging left-over and redundant comment in csr_load_work_fn()
Fixes: 1e657ad7a4 ("drm/i915/gen9: Write dc state debugmask bits only once")
CC: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
CC: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.jakobsson@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1457121461-16729-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
When adding IS_KABYLAKE definition I didn't included the
DC states related because I was planing to include them
with the patch that fixes DMC firmware loading, but I
forgot them.
Meanwhile this runtime pm code changed a lot for
Skylake.
Well, I didn't expect that this would crash the machine
and I just noticed now that Sarah warned me our driver
wasn't working. Thanks Sarah.
Michel had found the main error first and his
fix had better details on the history and got
merged already:
commit 16fbc291cb
Author: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Date: Wed Jan 6 12:08:36 2016 +0000
drm/i915/kbl: Enable PW1 and Misc I/O power wells
This one is a follow-up adding the other remaining
missing pieces.
v2: Rebased on top of Michel's patch as explained above.
Cc: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1452214179-22361-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.
This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.
The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.
As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
lea 0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
mov $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov %r9,%rsi
- mov %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov %r9d,%esi
+ mov %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
callq *0xd8(%rbx)
So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.
v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
mo more switch statements left to worry about
ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
This removes two anti-patterns:
- Locking shouldn't be used to synchronize with async work (of any
form, whether callbacks, workers or other threads). This is what the
mutex_lock/unlock seems to have been for in intel_csr_load_program.
Instead ordering should be ensured with the generic
wait_for_completion()/complete(). Or more specific functions
provided by the core kernel like e.g.
flush_work()/cancel_work_sync() in the case of synchronizing with a
work item.
- Don't invent own completion like the following code did with the
(already removed) wait_for(csr_load_status_get()) pattern - it's
really hard to get these right when you want them to be _really_
correct (and be fast) in all cases. Furthermore it's easier to read
code using the well-known primitives than new ones using
non-standard names.
Before enabling/disabling DC6 check if the firmware is loaded
successfully. This is guaranteed during runtime s/r, since otherwise we
don't enable RPM, but not during system s/r.
Note that it's still unclear whether we need to enable/disable DC6
during system s/r, until that's clarified, keep the current behavior and
enable/disable DC6.
Also after this patch there is a race during system s/r where the
firmware may not be loaded yet, that's addressed in an upcoming patch.
v2-v3:
- unchanged
v4:
- rebased on latest drm-intel-nightly
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
[imre: added code and note about checking if the firmware loaded ok,
before enabling/disabling it]
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com> # SKL
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447341037-2623-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
Dmc will restore the csr program except DC9, cold boot,
warm reset, PCI function level reset, and hibernate/suspend.
intel_csr_load_program() function is used to load the firmware
data from kernel memory to csr address space.
All values of csr address space will be zero if it got reset and
the first byte of csr program is always a non-zero if firmware
is loaded successfuly. Based on hardware status will load the
firmware.
Without this condition check if we overwrite the firmware data the
counters exposed for dc5/dc6 (help for debugging) will be nullified.
Note: Above commit message seems to be confused and the real problem
apparently going on is that for suspend-to-idle and system standby the
firmware survives (it's like runtime pm), but it doesn't for
suspend-to-mem and hibernate-to-disk. All the other talking about DC9
and pci reset are irrelevant for the path touched here (only driver
load and system resume functions) and might not be true statements.
v1: Initial version.
v2: Based on review comments from Daniel,
- Added a check to know hardware status and load the firmware if not loaded.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
[danvet: Explain clearly in the code comment when we need to reload
and when not and make it a FIXME. Also deconfuse the commit message
with a note. Also: Make. it. compile.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Backmerge to catch up with 4.3. slightly more involved conflict in the
irq code, but nothing beyond adjacent changes.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Broxton also has dmc to manage low-power display engine state.
Path of the firmware added in intel_csr.c.
Naming convention followed as <platform>_dmc_<api-version>.bin
v1: Initial version.
v2: Commit description added based on review comment from Sunil.
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Fix a wrong logical AND (&&) used for the range check of CSR MMIO.
Spotted nicely by gcc -Wlogical-op flag:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c: In function ‘finish_csr_load’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_csr.c:353:41: warning: logical ‘and’ of mutually exclusive tests is always false [-Wlogical-op]
Fixes: eb805623d8 ('drm/i915/skl: Add support to load SKL CSR firmware.')
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.2
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
This patch contains the changes to remove the byte
swapping logic introduced with old dmc firmware.
While debugging PC10 entry issue for skylake found
with latest dmc firmware version 1.18 without byte
swapping dmc is working fine and able to enter PC10.
Note that apparently this was changed with dmc version 1.0 and earlier
ones indeed are byteswapped like this ...
v1: Initial version.
v2: Corrected firmware size during memcpy(). (Suggested by Sunil)
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: A.Sunil Kamath <sunil.kamath@intel.com>
[danvet: Add note that this only holds for released dmc firmware.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Backmerge drm-next because the conflict between Ander's atomic fixes
for 4.2 and Maartens future work are getting to unwielding to handle.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
Just always take ours, same as git merge -X ours, but done by hand
because I didn't trust git: It's confusing that it doesn't show any
conflicts in the merge diff at all.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
It's handy to have debug message for the "big" events and this one
qualifies IMHO. Also helpful to see what's happening while we're loading
the firwmare and how much time it takes.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
