Pull x86 FPU updates from Ingo Molnar:
"The main changes in this cycle were:
- do a large round of simplifications after all CPUs do 'eager' FPU
context switching in v4.9: remove CR0 twiddling, remove leftover
eager/lazy bts, etc (Andy Lutomirski)
- more FPU code simplifications: remove struct fpu::counter, clarify
nomenclature, remove unnecessary arguments/functions and better
structure the code (Rik van Riel)"
* 'x86-fpu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/fpu: Remove clts()
x86/fpu: Remove stts()
x86/fpu: Handle #NM without FPU emulation as an error
x86/fpu, lguest: Remove CR0.TS support
x86/fpu, kvm: Remove host CR0.TS manipulation
x86/fpu: Remove irq_ts_save() and irq_ts_restore()
x86/fpu: Stop saving and restoring CR0.TS in fpu__init_check_bugs()
x86/fpu: Get rid of two redundant clts() calls
x86/fpu: Finish excising 'eagerfpu'
x86/fpu: Split old_fpu & new_fpu handling into separate functions
x86/fpu: Remove 'cpu' argument from __cpu_invalidate_fpregs_state()
x86/fpu: Split old & new FPU code paths
x86/fpu: Remove __fpregs_(de)activate()
x86/fpu: Rename lazy restore functions to "register state valid"
x86/fpu, kvm: Remove KVM vcpu->fpu_counter
x86/fpu: Remove struct fpu::counter
x86/fpu: Remove use_eager_fpu()
x86/fpu: Remove the XFEATURE_MASK_EAGER/LAZY distinction
x86/fpu: Hard-disable lazy FPU mode
x86/crypto, x86/fpu: Remove X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU #ifdef from the crc32c code
This moves the espfix64 logic into native_iret. To make this work,
it gets rid of the native patch for INTERRUPT_RETURN:
INTERRUPT_RETURN on native kernels is now 'jmp native_iret'.
This changes the 16-bit SS behavior on Xen from OOPSing to leaking
some bits of the Xen hypervisor's RSP (I think).
[ hpa: this is a nonzero cost on native, but probably not enough to
measure. Xen needs to fix this in their own code, probably doing
something equivalent to espfix64. ]
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7b8f1d8ef6597cb16ae004a43c56980a7de3cf94.1406129132.git.luto@amacapital.net
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Impact: Optimization
Several paravirt ops implementations simply return their arguments,
the most obvious being the make_pte/pte_val class of operations on
native.
On 32-bit, the identity function is literally a no-op, as the calling
convention uses the same registers for the first argument and return.
On 64-bit, it can be implemented with a single "mov".
This patch adds special identity functions for 32 and 64 bit argument,
and machinery to recognize them and replace them with either nops or a
mov as appropriate.
At the moment, the only users for the identity functions are the
pagetable entry conversion functions.
The result is a measureable improvement on pagetable-heavy benchmarks
(2-3%, reducing the pvops overhead from 5 to 2%).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Don't conflate sysret and sysexit; they're different instructions with
different semantics, and may be in use at the same time (at least
within the same kernel, depending on whether its an Intel or AMD
system).
sysexit - just return to userspace, does no register restoration of
any kind; must explicitly atomically enable interrupts.
sysret - reloads flags from r11, so no need to explicitly enable
interrupts on 64-bit, responsible for restoring usermode %gs
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citirx.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We use a __stringify construction at paravirt_patch_64.c.
It's better practice to include the stringify header directly
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Like i386, x86_64 also need to include its own patching function.
(Well, if you're not in a hurry, and don't care about speed, you don't
really _need_ ;-))
So here they are. Not much different in essence from i386
Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
