Instead of unconditionally stopping the watchdog timer after receipt of
a pretimeout NMI, reprogram the timeout based upon module parameter
kdumptimeout.
The provides a more flexible override than the depricated allow_kdump.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Instead of stopping the hw timer during probe, have the core update
the timer if the timer is already running.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Set max_hw_heartbeat_ms instead of max_timeout so that user client can
set timeout range in excess of what the underlying hardware supports.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
Have the WD core stop the watchdog on unregister instead of explicitly
calling hpwdt_stop() in hpwdt_exit().
Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
The commit 5e6acc3e67 ("bcm2835-pm: Move bcm2835-watchdog's DT probe
to an MFD.") broke module autoloading on Raspberry Pi. So add a
module alias this fix this.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
WDD value must be always set to max (0xFFF) otherwise the hardware
block will reset the board on the first ping of the watchdog.
Signed-off-by: Eugen Hristev <eugen.hristev@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>
When compile testing this driver without SMCC support enabled,
we get a link error:
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.o: In function `stm32_rproc_start':
stm32_rproc.c:(.text+0x776): undefined reference to `__arm_smccc_smc'
drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.o: In function `stm32_rproc_stop':
stm32_rproc.c:(.text+0x92c): undefined reference to `__arm_smccc_smc'
Make the actual call to arm_smccc_smc conditional on the Kconfig
symbol controlling its implementation.
Fixes: 13140de09c ("remoteproc: stm32: add an ST stm32_rproc driver")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Most modern platforms already have the ACPI device "INT33A1" that could
be used to attach to the driver. Switch the driver to using that and
thus make the intel_pmc_core.c a pure platform_driver.
Some of the legacy platforms though, may still not have this ACPI device
in their ACPI tables. Thus for such platforms, move the code to manually
instantiate a platform_device into a new file of its own. This would
instantiate the intel_pmc_core platform device and thus attach to
the driver, if the ACPI device for the same ("INT33A1") is not present
in a system where it should be. This was discussed here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1966991.html
Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>
[andy: renamed to intel_pmc_core_pltdrv.c to be in align with other drivers]
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
From discussions with Liviu it sounded like the komeda team would
benefit a bit from more cross-review with other drivers. To make sure
komeda is aligned with how similar problems are solved in other
drivers (in the end everyone ends up with similar ideas on how to
solve various display engine design issues).
An option would be to use drm-misc as an incubator for a few kernel
releases, at least until the big design items have been tackled: Aside
from the four kms properties already landed that we need to take out
again there's also a pile of new ones proposed already for komeda.
drm-misc seems to work fairly well at encouraging these kind of
cross-driver reviews and working on cross-driver infrastructure in drm
core. Later on we can move all the drivers out to a dedicated arm tree
again (if that's desired).
Of coures that would mean Lowry and James need drm-misc commit rights
(all other arm contributors have it already I think).
Cc: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@arm.com>
Cc: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190705121006.26085-5-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Properties are uapi like anything else, with all the usual rules
regarding review, testcases, open source userspace ... Furthermore
driver-private kms properties are highly discouraged, over the past
few years we've realized we need to make a serious effort at better
standardizing this stuff.
Again this probably needs multiple pieces to solve this properly:
- Instead of expecting userspace to compute this (and duplicating
modeset code), the kernel driver should compute when it's necessary
to enable layer_split mode to make a configuration possible. I.e. in
komeda_plane_atomic_check() first try komeda_build_layer_data_flow()
and if that fails, try komeda_build_layer_split_data_flow(), and set
dflow.en_split accordingly. Assuming I understand somewhat correctly
what this does.
- If this is needed for validation then you want a debugfs file to
force this one way or the other, or alternatively use
->atomic_print_state to dump such hidden driver-private state.
Depends upon how you do your validation ofc.
Fixes: a407a65093 ("drm/komeda: Add layer split support")
Cc: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@arm.com>
Cc: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190705121006.26085-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Properties are uapi like anything else, with all the usual rules
regarding review, testcases, open source userspace ... Furthermore
driver-private kms properties are highly discouraged, over the past
few years we've realized we need to make a serious effort at better
standardizing this stuff.
Again this probably needs multiple pieces to solve this properly:
- Instead of expecting userspace to compute this (and duplicating
modeset code), the kernel driver should compute when it's possible
to enable this better up/downscale mode (assuming I understood
Liviu correctly on what this does) automatically.
- If this is needed for validation then you want a debugfs file to
force this one way or the other, or alternatively use
->atomic_print_state to dump such hidden driver-private state.
Depends upon how you do your validation ofc.
Fixes: 42b6f118f6 ("drm/komeda: Add image enhancement support")
Cc: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@arm.com>
Cc: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190705121006.26085-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Properties are uapi like anything else, with all the usual rules
regarding review, testcases, open source userspace ... Furthermore
driver-private kms properties are highly discouraged, over the past
few years we've realized we need to make a serious effort at better
standardizing this stuff.
Again this probably needs multiple pieces to solve this properly:
- To make plane configuration less surprising to userspace you
propably need to virtualize planes, and reorder which logical plane
you map to which physical one dynamically. Instead of exposing a
komeda-specific limitation to userspace and expecting them to dtrt.
I think msm and rcar-du do that already (and others), if you need
people to chat with or example code.
- If this is needed for validation, again ->atomic_print_state and the
infrastructure around that is your friend.
Fixes: 3b9dfa4ef2 ("drm/komeda: Add slave pipeline support")
Cc: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@arm.com>
Cc: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190705121006.26085-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Properties are uapi like anything else, with all the usual rules
regarding review, testcases, open source userspace ... Furthermore
driver-private kms properties are highly discouraged, over the past
few years we've realized we need to make a serious effort at better
standardizing this stuff.
From the discussion with Liviu the solution for these here needs
multiple pieces:
- For being able to reliably read the memory clock we need a DT
property, plus maybe DT override snippets to fix it if it's wrong.
- For exposing plane limitations to userspace there's TEST_ONLY. There
is a bit a gap in telling userspace better that scaling doesn't work
due to limits (atm a good strategy is to retry again without scaling
when adding a plane didn't work the first time around). But that
needs a more generic solution, not exposing something extremely
komeda specific.
- If this is needed by validation tools, you can still expose it in
debugfs. We have an entire nice infrastructure for debug printing of
kms objects already, see the various atomic_print_state callbacks
and infrastructure around them.
Fixes: 1f7f9ab790 ("drm/komeda: Add engine clock requirement check for the downscaling")
Cc: Lowry Li (Arm Technology China) <lowry.li@arm.com>
Cc: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Mali DP Maintainers <malidp@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190705121006.26085-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Andrii Nakryiko says:
====================
This patchset adds a high-level API for setting up and polling perf buffers
associated with BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY map. Details of APIs are
described in corresponding commit.
Patch #1 adds a set of APIs to set up and work with perf buffer.
Patch #2 enhances libbpf to support auto-setting PERF_EVENT_ARRAY map size.
Patch #3 adds test.
Patch #4 converts bpftool map event_pipe to new API.
Patch #5 updates README to mention perf_buffer_ prefix.
v6->v7:
- __x64_ syscall prefix (Yonghong);
v5->v6:
- fix C99 for loop variable initialization usage (Yonghong);
v4->v5:
- initialize perf_buffer_raw_opts in bpftool map event_pipe (Jakub);
- add perf_buffer_ to README;
v3->v4:
- fixed bpftool event_pipe cmd error handling (Jakub);
v2->v3:
- added perf_buffer__new_raw for more low-level control;
- converted bpftool map event_pipe to new API (Daniel);
- fixed bug with error handling in create_maps (Song);
v1->v2:
- add auto-sizing of PERF_EVENT_ARRAY maps;
====================
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
perf_buffer "object" is part of libbpf API now, add it to the list of
libbpf function prefixes.
Suggested-by: Daniel Borkman <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Switch event_pipe implementation to rely on new libbpf perf buffer API
(it's raw low-level variant).
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
For BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY typically correct size is number of
possible CPUs. This is impossible to specify at compilation time. This
change adds automatic setting of PERF_EVENT_ARRAY size to number of
system CPUs, unless non-zero size is specified explicitly. This allows
to adjust size for advanced specific cases, while providing convenient
and logical defaults.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY map is often used to send data from BPF program
to user space for additional processing. libbpf already has very low-level API
to read single CPU perf buffer, bpf_perf_event_read_simple(), but it's hard to
use and requires a lot of code to set everything up. This patch adds
perf_buffer abstraction on top of it, abstracting setting up and polling
per-CPU logic into simple and convenient API, similar to what BCC provides.
perf_buffer__new() sets up per-CPU ring buffers and updates corresponding BPF
map entries. It accepts two user-provided callbacks: one for handling raw
samples and one for get notifications of lost samples due to buffer overflow.
perf_buffer__new_raw() is similar, but provides more control over how
perf events are set up (by accepting user-provided perf_event_attr), how
they are handled (perf_event_header pointer is passed directly to
user-provided callback), and on which CPUs ring buffers are created
(it's possible to provide a list of CPUs and corresponding map keys to
update). This API allows advanced users fuller control.
perf_buffer__poll() is used to fetch ring buffer data across all CPUs,
utilizing epoll instance.
perf_buffer__free() does corresponding clean up and unsets FDs from BPF map.
All APIs are not thread-safe. User should ensure proper locking/coordination if
used in multi-threaded set up.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
