The current formulation of the bw_params loop uses the counter j as an
index for the first dimension of the bw_params array which is later
incremented by the variable i. It is evaluated correctly only, because j
is initialized to 0 at the beginning of the loop. I think that
explicitly using the index 0 better reflects the intent of the
expression.
Signed-off-by: Hans-Frieder Vogt <hfvogt@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Instead of using a table for reg bitmask, use a macro. This should save
some data segment space.
Cc: Thomas Mair <thomas.mair86@googlemail.com>
Cc: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Changelog for ver. 0.5:
- fixed code style and naming errors
Changelog for ver. 0.4:
- removed statistics as their calculation was wrong
- fixed bug in Makefile
- indentation and code style improvements
Signed-off-by: Thomas Mair <thomas.mair86@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
