During the assembly cleanup patchset review, I found more symbols which
are used only locally. So make them really local by prepending ".L" to
them. Namely:
- wakeup_idt is used only in realmode/rm/wakeup_asm.S.
- in_pm32 is used only in boot/pmjump.S.
- retint_user is used only in entry/entry_64.S, perhaps since commit
2ec67971fa ("x86/entry/64/compat: Remove most of the fast system
call machinery"), where entry_64_compat's caller was removed.
Drop GLOBAL from all of them too. I do not see more candidates in the
series.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bp@alien8.de
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191011092213.31470-1-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Impact: cleanup
The setup code is mostly 16-bit code, but there is a small stub of
32-bit code at the end. Move the 32-bit code to a separate segment,
.text32, to avoid scrambling the disassembly.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Impact: cleanup
We are in setup stage so we use GLOBAL
instead of ENTRY and do not increase code
size.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> Maybe it really does require the far jump immediately after setting PE
> in cr0...
>
> Hm, I don't remember this paragraph being in vol 3a, section 8.9.1
> before. Is it a recent addition?
>
> Random failures can occur if other instructions exist between steps
> 3 and 4 above. Failures will be readily seen in some situations,
> such as when instructions that reference memory are inserted between
> steps 3 and 4 while in system management mode.
>
I don't remember that, either.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To set CR0.PE, use the X86_CR0_PE macro defined in
<asm/processor-flags.h> instead of hardcoding it as a constant (1).
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Intel VT doesn't like to engage when the protected-mode state isn't
fully initialized. Make life easier for it by initializing LDTR (to
null) and TR (to a dummy hunk of low memory which will never actually
be touched.)
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Make the transition to protected mode more paranoid by having
back-to-back near jump (to synchronize the 386/486 prefetch queue) and
far jump (to set up the code segment.)
While we're at it, zero as many registers as practical (for future
expandability of the 32-bit entry interface) and enter 32-bit mode
with a valid stack. Note that the 32-bit code cannot rely on this
stack, or we'll break all other existing users of the 32-bit
entrypoint, but it may make debugging hacks easier to write.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
In accordance with the newly formalized 32-bit boot protocol, set
%ebx == %ebp == %edi == 0 in order to support future extensions to the
protocol.
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
