According to internal documents I found for CMP PCHs the PCI ID 0xA3C1
belongs to a CMP-V chipset. Based on the same docs the programming of
the PCH is compatible with that of KBP. Fix up my previous wrong
assumption accordingly using the SPT programming which in turn is the
basis for KBP.
The original bug reporter verified that this is the correct PCH
identification (the only way we'll program valid DDC pin-pair values to
the GMBUS register) and the Windows team uses the same identification
(that is using the KBP programming model for this PCH).
I filed the necessary Bspec update requests (BSpec/33734).
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112051
Fixes: 37c92dc303 ("drm/i915: Add new CNL PCH ID seen on a CML platform")
Reported-and-tested-by: Cyrus <cyrus.lien@canonical.com>
Cc: Cyrus <cyrus.lien@canonical.com>
Cc: Timo Aaltonen <tjaalton@ubuntu.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191112104608.24587-1-imre.deak@intel.com
The Jasper Lake PCH follows ICP/TGP's south display behavior and is
identical to MCC graphics-wise except that it does not use the unusual
(port C -> TC1) pin mapping that MCC does.
Also, it turns out the extra PCH ID that we had previously thought was a
form of MCC is actually a second ID for JSP (i.e., port C uses the port
C pins instead of the TC1 pins).
v2:
- Also update the port masks (not just the pin table) in
mcc_hpd_irq_setup. (Vivek)
v3:
- Break jsp_hpd_irq_setup out into its own function for clarity.
(Vivek)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com>
Cc: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191015162854.30546-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
