Use of the new DRM_COLOR_LUT_NON_DECREASING test was a bit over-zealous;
it doesn't actually need to be applied to the degamma on "bdw-style"
platforms. Likewise, we overlooked the fact that CHV should have that
test applied to the gamma LUT as well as the degamma LUT.
Rather than adding more complicated platform checking to
intel_color_check(), let's just store the appropriate set of LUT
validation flags for each platform in the intel_device_info structure.
v2:
- Shuffle around LUT size tests so that the hardware-specific tests
won't be applied to legacy gamma tables. (Ville)
- Add a debug message so that it will be easier to understand why an
atomic transaction involving incorrectly-sized LUT's got rejected
by the driver.
v3:
- Switch size_t's to int's. (Ville)
Fixes: 85e2d61e49 ("drm/i915: Validate userspace-provided color management LUT's (v4)")
References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2019-January/187634.html
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190130181022.4291-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
amdgpu only uses shared-fences internally, but dmabuf importers rely on
implicit write hazard tracking via the reservation_object.fence_excl.
For example, the importer use the write hazard for timing a page flip to
only occur after the exporter has finished flushing its write into the
surface. As such, on exporting a dmabuf, we must either flush all
outstanding fences (for we do not know which are writes and should have
been exclusive) or alternatively create a new exclusive fence that is
the composite of all the existing shared fences, and so will only be
signaled when all earlier fences are signaled (ensuring that we can not
be signaled before the completion of any earlier write).
v2: reservation_object is already locked by amdgpu_bo_reserve()
v3: Replace looping with get_fences_rcu and special case the promotion
of a single shared fence directly to an exclusive fence, bypassing the
fence array.
v4: Drop the fence array ref after assigning to reservation_object
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107341
Testcase: igt/amd_prime/amd-to-i915
References: 8e94a46c17 ("drm/amdgpu: Attach exclusive fence to prime exported bo's. (v5)")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/savage/savage_state.c:301:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/gpu/drm/savage/savage_state.c:438:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/gpu/drm/savage/savage_state.c:559:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/gpu/drm/savage/savage_state.c:697:8: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129202005.GA25789@embeddedor
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dmablit.c:179:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dmablit.c:185:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dmablit.c:187:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_dmablit.c:195:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129201742.GA25660@embeddedor
The spec doesn't use a definite article in front of SAGV. The
rules regarding articles and initialisms are super fuzzy, but
at least to my ears it sounds much more natural to not have
the article. Perhaps because I tend to pronounce it as
"sag-vee" instead of spelling out the letters one at a time.
Actually I might still prefer to leave out the article if I
did spell them out.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181221171436.8218-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On icl+ bspec tells us to calculate a separate minimum ddb
allocation from the blocks watermark. Both have to be checked
against the actual ddb allocation, but since we do things the
other way around we'll just calculat the minimum acceptable
ddb allocation by taking the maximum of the two values.
We'll also replace the memcmp() with a full trawl over the
the watermarks so that it'll ignore the min_ddb_alloc
because we can't directly read that out from the hw. I suppose
we could reconstruct it from the other values, but I was
too lazy to do that now.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181221171436.8218-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Fix the TODO leftover in the code by changing the argument in MG_PLL
macros. The MG_PLL ids used to access the register values can be
converted from tc_port rather than port.
All these registers can use the TC port to calculate the right offsets
because they are only available for TC ports. The range (PORT_C onwards)
may not be stable and change from platform to platform. So by using the
TC id directly we avoid having to check for the platform in the "leaf
functions" and thus passing dev_priv around.
The helper functions were also renamed to use "tc" as prefix to make
them more generic.
v2: Improve commit message and fix checkpatch warning (from Paulo)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190125222444.19926-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Missed breadcrumb detection is defunct due to the tight coupling with
dma_fence signaling and the myriad ways we may signal fences from
everywhere but from an interrupt, i.e. we frequently signal a fence
before we even see its interrupt. This means that even if we miss an
interrupt for a fence, it still is signaled before our breadcrumb
hangcheck fires, so simplify the breadcrumb hangchecking by moving it
into the GPU hangcheck and forgo fake interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129205230.19056-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
A few years ago, see commit 688e6c7258 ("drm/i915: Slaughter the
thundering i915_wait_request herd"), the issue of handling multiple
clients waiting in parallel was brought to our attention. The
requirement was that every client should be woken immediately upon its
request being signaled, without incurring any cpu overhead.
To handle certain fragility of our hw meant that we could not do a
simple check inside the irq handler (some generations required almost
unbounded delays before we could be sure of seqno coherency) and so
request completion checking required delegation.
Before commit 688e6c7258, the solution was simple. Every client
waiting on a request would be woken on every interrupt and each would do
a heavyweight check to see if their request was complete. Commit
688e6c7258 introduced an rbtree so that only the earliest waiter on
the global timeline would woken, and would wake the next and so on.
(Along with various complications to handle requests being reordered
along the global timeline, and also a requirement for kthread to provide
a delegate for fence signaling that had no process context.)
The global rbtree depends on knowing the execution timeline (and global
seqno). Without knowing that order, we must instead check all contexts
queued to the HW to see which may have advanced. We trim that list by
only checking queued contexts that are being waited on, but still we
keep a list of all active contexts and their active signalers that we
inspect from inside the irq handler. By moving the waiters onto the fence
signal list, we can combine the client wakeup with the dma_fence
signaling (a dramatic reduction in complexity, but does require the HW
being coherent, the seqno must be visible from the cpu before the
interrupt is raised - we keep a timer backup just in case).
Having previously fixed all the issues with irq-seqno serialisation (by
inserting delays onto the GPU after each request instead of random delays
on the CPU after each interrupt), we can rely on the seqno state to
perfom direct wakeups from the interrupt handler. This allows us to
preserve our single context switch behaviour of the current routine,
with the only downside that we lose the RT priority sorting of wakeups.
In general, direct wakeup latency of multiple clients is about the same
(about 10% better in most cases) with a reduction in total CPU time spent
in the waiter (about 20-50% depending on gen). Average herd behaviour is
improved, but at the cost of not delegating wakeups on task_prio.
v2: Capture fence signaling state for error state and add comments to
warm even the most cold of hearts.
v3: Check if the request is still active before busywaiting
v4: Reduce the amount of pointer misdirection with list_for_each_safe
and using a local i915_request variable inside the loops
v5: Add a missing pluralisation to a purely informative selftest message.
References: 688e6c7258 ("drm/i915: Slaughter the thundering i915_wait_request herd")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129205230.19056-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Let's switch the pipe into interlaced mode and switch off
the TV encoder vertical filter if the pipe vdisplay
matches the TV YSIZE exactly.
While I didn't measure it I presume this might reduce
the power consumption a little bit, and the pixel rate
is halved as the pipe will now fetching in interlaced
mode rather than in progressive mode (effectively the
same difference as between IF-ID vs. PF-ID pfit modes
on more modern hardware) so a bit easier on the memory
bandwidth.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129141913.5515-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
intel_tv_mode_to_mode() assumes the pipe will be in progressive
fetch mode, and thus when programming the pipe into interlaced
mode we have to halve the calculated dotclock to get the correct
field duration.
This becomes more important when we start to program the pipe
into interlaced mode on i965gm as we depend on the timestamps
to get accurate frame counter values. Withot halving the clock
our guesstimated frame counter would tick at twice the expected
speed.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Fixes: 690157f0a9 ("drm/i915/tv: Fix >1024 modes on gen3")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129141913.5515-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
sriov need to restrict max_pfn below AMDGPU_GMC_HOLE.
access the hole results in a range fault interrupt IIRC.
Signed-off-by: Wentao Lou <Wentao.Lou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
After removing unnecessary VM size calculations,
vm_manager.max_pfn would reach 0x10,0000,0000
max_pfn << AMDGPU_GPU_PAGE_SHIFT exceeding AMDGPU_GMC_HOLE_START
would cause GPU reset.
Signed-off-by: wentalou <Wentao.Lou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Monk Liu <monk.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In order to avoid preempting ourselves, we currently refuse to schedule
the tasklet if we reschedule an inflight context. However, this glosses
over a few issues such as what happens after a CS completion event and
we then preempt the newly executing context with itself, or if something
else causes a tasklet_schedule triggering the same evaluation to
preempt the active context with itself.
However, when we avoid preempting ELSP[0], we still retain the preemption
value as it may match a second preemption request within the same time period
that we need to resolve after the next CS event. However, since we only
store the maximum preemption priority seen, it may not match the
subsequent event and so we should double check whether or not we
actually do need to trigger a preempt-to-idle by comparing the top
priorities from each queue. Later, this gives us a hook for finer
control over deciding whether the preempt-to-idle is justified.
The sequence of events where we end up preempting for no avail is:
1. Queue requests/contexts A, B
2. Priority boost A; no preemption as it is executing, but keep hint
3. After CS switch, B is less than hint, force preempt-to-idle
4. Resubmit B after idling
v2: We can simplify a bunch of tests based on the knowledge that PI will
ensure that earlier requests along the same context will have the highest
priority.
v3: Demonstrate the stale preemption hint with a selftest
References: a2bf92e8cc ("drm/i915/execlists: Avoid kicking priority on the current context")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129185452.20989-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
After noticing that we trigger preemption events for currently executing
requests, as well as requests that complete before the preemption and
attempting to suppress those preemption events, it is wise to not
consider the queue_priority to be authoritative. As we only track the
maximum priority seen between dequeue passes, if the maximum priority
request is no longer available for dequeuing (it completed or is even
executing on another engine), we have no knowledge of the previous
queue_priority as it would require us to keep a full history of enqueued
requests -- but we already have that history in the priolists!
Rename the queue_priority to queue_priority_hint so that we do not
confuse it as being exactly the maximum priority in the queue, but merely
an indication that we have seen a new maximum priority value and as such
we should check whether it should preempt the currently running request.
v2: s/preempt_priority_hint/queue_priority_hint/ as preempt implies it
being only used for the singular task of preemption and not the wider
question of waking up due to a change in the queue.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129185452.20989-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
To allow requests to forgo a common execution timeline, one question we
need to be able to answer is "is this request running?". To track
whether a request has started on HW, we can emit a breadcrumb at the
beginning of the request and check its timeline's HWSP to see if the
breadcrumb has advanced past the start of this request. (This is in
contrast to the global timeline where we need only ask if we are on the
global timeline and if the timeline has advanced past the end of the
previous request.)
There is still confusion from a preempted request, which has already
started but relinquished the HW to a high priority request. For the
common case, this discrepancy should be negligible. However, for
identification of hung requests, knowing which one was running at the
time of the hang will be much more important.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129185452.20989-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In bringup on simulated HW even rudimentary tests are slow, and so many
may fail that we want to be able to filter out the noise to focus on the
specific problem. Even just the tests groups provided for igt is not
specific enough, and we would like to isolate one particular subtest
(and probably subsubtests!). For simplicity, allow the user to provide a
command line parameter such as
i915.st_filter=i915_timeline_mock_selftests/igt_sync
to restrict ourselves to only running on subtest. The exact name to use
is given during a normal run, highlighted as an error if it failed,
debug otherwise. The test group is optional, and then all subtests are
compared for an exact match with the filter (most subtests have unique
names). The filter can be negated, e.g. i915.st_filter=!igt_sync and
then all tests but those that match will be run. More than one match can
be supplied separated by a comma, e.g.
i915.st_filter=igt_vma_create,igt_vma_pin1
to only run those specified, or
i915.st_filter=!igt_vma_create,!igt_vma_pin1
to run all but those named. Mixing a blacklist and whitelist will only
execute those subtests matching the whitelist so long as they are
previously excluded in the blacklist.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129185452.20989-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Add missing break statement in order to prevent the code from falling
through to the default case.
The resoning for this is that pclk_vol_table is an automatic variable.
So, it makes no sense to update it just before falling through to the
default case and return -EINVAL.
This bug was found thanks to the ongoing efforts to enabling
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Fixes: cd70f3d6e3 ("drm/amd/powerplay: PP/DAL interface changes for dynamic clock switch")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Add missing power_average to visible check for power
attributes for APUs. Was missed before.
Reviewed-by: Evan Quan <evan.quan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c:368:13: error: 'dpu_plane_danger_signal_ctrl' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
Fixes: 7b2e7adea7 ("drm/msm/dpu: Make dpu_plane_danger_signal_ctrl void")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Add a few __printf attribute specifiers to routines that
could use them.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
The bindings for Qualcomm opp levels changed after being Acked but
before landing. Thus the code in the GPU driver that was relying on
the old bindings is now broken.
Let's change the code to match the new bindings by adjusting the old
string 'qcom,level' to the new string 'opp-level'. See the patch
("dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-level bindings").
NOTE: we will do additional cleanup to totally remove the string from
the code and use the new dev_pm_opp_get_level() but we'll do it in a
future patch. This will facilitate getting the important code fix in
sooner without having to deal with cross-maintainer dependencies.
This patch needs to land before the patch ("arm64: dts: sdm845: Add
gpu and gmu device nodes") since if a tree contains the device tree
patch but not this one you'll get a crash at bootup.
Fixes: 4b565ca5a2 ("drm/msm: Add A6XX device support")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
