Some GPU units are capable of supporting "replayable" page faults, where
the execution unit will wait for SW to fixup GPU page tables rather than
triggering a channel-fatal fault.
This feature isn't useful (it's harmful, even) unless something like HMM
is being used to manage events appearing in the replayable fault buffer,
so, it's disabled by default.
This commit allows a client to request it be enabled.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Host methods exist to do at least some of what we need, but we are not
currently pushing replay/cancels through a channel like UVM does as it's
not clear whether it's necessary in our case (UVM also updates PTEs with
the GPU).
UVM also pushes a software method for fault cancels on Pascal, seemingly
because the host methods don't appear to be sufficient. If/when we want
to push the replay/cancel on the GPU, we can re-purpose the cancellation
code here to implement that swmthd.
Keep it simple for now, until we figure out exactly what we need here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This provides a somewhat more direct method of manipulating the GPU page
tables, which will be required to support SVM.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This will be used to support a privileged client providing PTEs directly,
without a memory object to use as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
NVKM is currently responsible for managing the allocation of a client's
GPU address-space, but there's various use-cases (ie. HMM address-space
mirroring) where giving a client more direct control is desirable.
This commit allows for a VMM to be created where the area allocated for
NVKM is limited to a client-specified window, the remainder of address-
space is controlled directly by the client.
Leaving a window is necessary to support various internal requirements,
but also to support existing allocation interfaces as not all of the HW
is capable of working with a HMM allocation.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
As I currently understand it, this is related to features we have no
support for as of yet.
In theory, this change should be a noop, just without the warning.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Will be using this in upcoming changes to avoid the need for entirely
new subdevs to deal with Turing register moves.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Currently the uninitialized values in the array reply are printed out
when exec is false and nvkm_pmu_send has not updated the array. Avoid
confusion by only dumping out these values if they have been actually
updated.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1271291 ("Uninitialized scaler variable")
Fixes: ebb58dc2ef ("drm/nouveau/pmu: rename from pwr (no binary change)")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result
in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has
higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing
parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will
result in the desired result.
[ Note, not tested ]
Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result")
Fixes: c25bf7b615 ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Don't populate the array vsoff on the stack but instead make it
static. Makes the object code smaller by 67 bytes:
Before:
text data bss dec hex filename
5753 112 0 5865 16e9 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o
After:
text data bss dec hex filename
5622 176 0 5798 16a6 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o
(gcc version 8.2.0 x86_64)
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
New registers.
Currently uncertain how exactly to mask fault buffer interrupts. This will
likely be corrected at around the same time as the new MC interrupt stuff
has been properly figured out and implemented.
For the moment, it shouldn't matter too much.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Things are a bit different here on Turing, and will require further changes
yet once I've investigated them more thoroughly.
For now though, the existing GP100 code is compatible enough with one small
hack to forward on fault buffer interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This is needed for Turing, but we're supposed to wait for completion after
re-writing the value on older GPUs anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Aside from being a nice cleanup, these will to allow the upcoming direct
page mapping interfaces to play nicely with normal mappings.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
The GPU will continually fire interrupts while a fault buffer GET != PUT,
and to stop the spurious interrupts while the handler does its thing, we
were disabling the fault buffer temporarily.
This is not actually a great idea to begin with, and made worse by Volta
resetting GET/PUT when it's reactivated. So, let's not do that.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Various structures are accessed by the GPU through BAR2 for some reason
on newer GPUs. This commit makes it more convenient to handle.
Will be used for GP100- fault buffers, and GV100- fault method buffers.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
In case memory resources for *bl_desc* were allocated, release
them before return.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1472021 ("Resource leak")
Fixes: 0d46690155 ("drm/nouveau/secboot/acr: Remove VLA usage")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Messed up when sending pull request and sent an outdated version of
previous patch, this fixes it up to remove warnings.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This Falcon application doesn't appear to be present on some newer
systems, so let's not fail init if we can't find it.
TBD: is there a way to determine whether it *should* be there?
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
This was causing problems on a system with a large amount of RAM, where
display push buffers were being fetched incorrectly when placed in high
system memory addresses.
While this commit will resolve the issue on that particular system, the
issue will be avoided completely with another patch to more fully solve
problems with display and large amounts of system memory on Pascal.
It's still probably a good idea to disable this to prevent weird issues
in the future.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
If the entry size is too small, default to invalid values for both
boost_id and tdp_id, so as to default to the base clock in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
