Don't burden the common block code with with specifics of the libata DMA
draining mechanism. Instead move most of the code to the scsi midlayer.
That also means the nr_phys_segments adjustments in the blk-mq fast path
can go away entirely, given that SCSI never looks at nr_phys_segments
after mapping the request to a scatterlist.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
scsi_init_io is the only caller of scsi_init_sgtable. Merge the two
function to make upcoming changes a little easier.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
qlt_free_session_done() tries to post async PRLO / LOGO, and waits for the
completion of these async commands. If UNLOADING is set, this is doomed to
timeout, because the async logout command will never complete.
The only way to avoid waiting pointlessly is to fail posting these commands
in the first place if the driver is in UNLOADING state. In general,
posting any command should be avoided when the driver is UNLOADING.
With this patch, "rmmod qla2xxx" completes without noticeable delay.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421204621.19228-3-mwilck@suse.com
Fixes: 45235022da ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix driver unload by shutting down chip")
Acked-by: Arun Easi <aeasi@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
The purpose of the UNLOADING flag is to avoid port login procedures to
continue when a controller is in the process of shutting down. It makes
sense to set this flag before starting session teardown.
Furthermore, use atomic test_and_set_bit() to avoid the shutdown being run
multiple times in parallel. In qla2x00_disable_board_on_pci_error(), the
test for UNLOADING is postponed until after the check for an already
disabled PCI board.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421204621.19228-2-mwilck@suse.com
Fixes: 45235022da ("scsi: qla2xxx: Fix driver unload by shutting down chip")
Reviewed-by: Arun Easi <aeasi@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Roman Bolshakov <r.bolshakov@yadro.com>
Reviewed-by: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
The APIs scsi_host_block()/scsi_host_unblock() were recently added by
commit 2bb955840c ("scsi: core: add scsi_host_(block,unblock) helper
function") and so far the APIs are only used by: commit 3d3ca53b16
("scsi: aacraid: use scsi_host_(block,unblock) to block I/O").
However, from reading the code, I think the APIs don't really work for
aacraid, because, in the resume path of hibernation, when aac_suspend() ->
scsi_host_block() is called, scsi_device_quiesce() has set the state to
SDEV_QUIESCE, so aac_suspend() -> scsi_host_block() returns -EINVAL.
Fix the issue by allowing the state change.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1587170445-50013-1-git-send-email-decui@microsoft.com
Fixes: 2bb955840c ("scsi: core: add scsi_host_(block,unblock) helper function")
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
This reverts commit 7e70aa789d.
Now that we have the patches ("blk-mq: In blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list()
"no budget" is a reason to kick") and ("blk-mq: Rerun dispatching in
the case of budget contention") we should no longer need the fix in
the SCSI code. Revert it, resolving conflicts with other patches that
have touched this code.
With this revert (and the two new patches) I can run the script that
was in commit 7e70aa789d ("scsi: core: run queue if SCSI device
queue isn't ready and queue is idle") in a loop with no failure. If I
do this revert without the two new patches I can easily get a failure.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
The MFW may make a call to qed and then to qedf for protocol statistics
while the function is still probing. If this happens it's possible that
some members of the struct qedf_ctx may not be fully initialized which can
result in a NULL pointer dereference or general protection fault.
To prevent this, add a new flag call QEDF_PROBING and set it when the
__qedf_probe() function is active. Then in the qedf_get_protocol_tlv_data()
function we can check if the function is still probing and return
immediantely before any uninitialized structures can be touched.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200416084314.18851-9-skashyap@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Chad Dupuis <cdupuis@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
If a port is brought down for an extended period of time, the fipvlan
counter gets exhausted and the driver will fall back to default VLAN 1002
and call fcoe_ctlr_link_up to log in. However, the switch will discard the
FLOGI attempt because the VLAN is now different.
Keep track of the number of FLOGI attempts and if a threshold of
QEDF_FLOGI_RETRY_CNT is exceeded, perform a context soft reset.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200416084314.18851-2-skashyap@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c:257:5: warning: symbol 'vnic_dev_cmd1' was
not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c:319:5: warning: symbol 'vnic_dev_cmd2' was
not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c:414:5: warning: symbol
'vnic_dev_init_devcmd1' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c:425:5: warning: symbol
'vnic_dev_init_devcmd2' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c:495:6: warning: symbol
'vnic_dev_deinit_devcmd2' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/fnic/vnic_dev.c:506:5: warning: symbol
'vnic_dev_cmd_no_proxy' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200415093809.9365-1-yanaijie@huawei.com
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:180:1: warning: symbol
'megasas_enable_intr_fusion' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:202:1: warning: symbol
'megasas_disable_intr_fusion' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c:4233:6: warning: symbol
'megasas_refire_mgmt_cmd' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200407092827.18074-4-yanaijie@huawei.com
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c:88:5: warning: symbol
'mega_div64_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c:370:5: warning: symbol
'MR_GetSpanBlock' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c:420:5: warning: symbol
'mr_spanset_get_span_block' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c:645:4: warning: symbol 'get_arm'
was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c:788:4: warning: symbol
'MR_GetPhyParams' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c:1345:4: warning: symbol
'megasas_get_best_arm_pd' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200407092827.18074-3-yanaijie@huawei.com
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c:305:5: warning: symbol
'dev_attr_megaraid_mbox_app_hndl' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mbox.c:315:5: warning: symbol
'dev_attr_megaraid_mbox_ld' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200407092827.18074-2-yanaijie@huawei.com
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
