[ Upstream commit c5d22f4cfe8dfb93f1db0a1e7e2e7ebc41395d98 ]
The snprintf() function returns the number of bytes which *would*
have been copied if there were space. In other words, it can be
> sizeof(pin_path).
Fixes: c0fa1b6c3e ("bpf: btf: Add BTF tests")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YtZ+aD/tZMkgOUw+@kili
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 8f50f16ff39dd4e2d43d1548ca66925652f8aff7 upstream.
Add coverage to the verifier tests and tests for reading bpf_sock fields to
ensure that 32-bit, 16-bit, and 8-bit loads from dst_port field are allowed
only at intended offsets and produce expected values.
While 16-bit and 8-bit access to dst_port field is straight-forward, 32-bit
wide loads need be allowed and produce a zero-padded 16-bit value for
backward compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220130115518.213259-3-jakub@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[OP: backport to 5.10: adjusted context in sock_fields.c]
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit c2fcbf81c332b42382a0c439bfe2414a241e4f5b ]
The libbpf CI reported occasional failure in btf_skc_cls_ingress:
test_syncookie:FAIL:Unexpected syncookie states gen_cookie:80326634 recv_cookie:0
bpf prog error at line 97
"error at line 97" means the bpf prog cannot find the listening socket
when the final ack is received. It then skipped processing
the syncookie in the final ack which then led to "recv_cookie:0".
The problem is the userspace program did not do accept() and went
ahead to close(listen_fd) before the kernel (and the bpf prog) had
a chance to process the final ack.
The fix is to add accept() call so that the userspace will wait for
the kernel to finish processing the final ack first before close()-ing
everything.
Fixes: 9a856cae22 ("bpf: selftest: Add test_btf_skc_cls_ingress")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211216191630.466151-1-kafai@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c3fc706e94f5653def2783ffcd809a38676b7551 ]
Similar to the fix in commit:
e31eec77e4ab ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot")
We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on
future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size.
The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen
with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future
tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking
internal libbpf assumptions.
Fixes: 0ab5539f85 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211028063501.2239335-8-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 509b2937bce90089fd2785db9f27951a3d850c34 ]
Convert the selftests for sk_lookup narrow context access to use
PROG_TEST_RUN instead of creating actual sockets. This ensures that
ctx is populated correctly when using PROG_TEST_RUN.
Assert concrete values since we now control remote_ip and remote_port.
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210303101816.36774-4-lmb@cloudflare.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Commit 183d9ebd44 ("selftests/bpf: Fix core_reloc test runner") causes
builds of selftests/bpf to fail on 5.10.y since the branch doesn't have the
ASSERT_FALSE macro yet. Replace ASSERT_FALSE with ASSERT_EQ.
Fixes: 183d9ebd44 ("selftests/bpf: Fix core_reloc test runner")
Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b16ac5bf732a5e23d164cf908ec7742d6a6120d3 ]
libbpf CI has reported send_signal test is flaky although
I am not able to reproduce it in my local environment.
But I am able to reproduce with on-demand libbpf CI ([1]).
Through code analysis, the following is possible reason.
The failed subtest runs bpf program in softirq environment.
Since bpf_send_signal() only sends to a fork of "test_progs"
process. If the underlying current task is
not "test_progs", bpf_send_signal() will not be triggered
and the subtest will fail.
To reduce the chances where the underlying process is not
the intended one, this patch boosted scheduling priority to
-20 (highest allowed by setpriority() call). And I did
10 runs with on-demand libbpf CI with this patch and I
didn't observe any failures.
[1] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/workflows/ondemand.yml
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210817190923.3186725-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bede0ebf0be87e9678103486a77f39e0334c6791 ]
Fix failed tests checks in core_reloc test runner, which allowed failing tests
to pass quietly. Also add extra check to make sure that expected to fail test cases with
invalid names are caught as test failure anyway, as this is not an expected
failure mode. Also fix mislabeled probed vs direct bitfield test cases.
Fixes: 124a892d1c ("selftests/bpf: Test TYPE_EXISTS and TYPE_SIZE CO-RE relocations")
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5a30eb23922b52f33222c6729b6b3ff1c37a6c66 ]
Negative field existence cases for have a broken assumption that FIELD_EXISTS
CO-RE relo will fail for fields that match the name but have incompatible type
signature. That's not how CO-RE relocations generally behave. Types and fields
that match by name but not by expected type are treated as non-matching
candidates and are skipped. Error later is reported if no matching candidate
was found. That's what happens for most relocations, but existence relocations
(FIELD_EXISTS and TYPE_EXISTS) are more permissive and they are designed to
return 0 or 1, depending if a match is found. This allows to handle
name-conflicting but incompatible types in BPF code easily. Combined with
___flavor suffixes, it's possible to handle pretty much any structural type
changes in kernel within the compiled once BPF source code.
So, long story short, negative field existence test cases are invalid in their
assumptions, so this patch reworks them into a single consolidated positive
case that doesn't match any of the fields.
Fixes: c7566a6969 ("selftests/bpf: Add field existence CO-RE relocs tests")
Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210426192949.416837-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The verifier trace changed following a bugfix. After checking the 64-bit
sign, only the upper bit mask is known, not bit 31. Update the test
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Avoid occasional test failures due to the last sample being delayed to
another ring_buffer__poll() call. Instead, drain samples completely with
ring_buffer__consume(). This is supposed to fix a rare and non-deterministic
test failure in libbpf CI.
Fixes: cb1c9ddd55 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF ringbuf selftests")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201130223336.904192-2-andrii@kernel.org
Fix ring_buffer__poll() to return the number of non-discarded records
consumed, just like its documentation states. It's also consistent with
ring_buffer__consume() return. Fix up selftests with wrong expected results.
Fixes: bf99c936f9 ("libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support")
Fixes: cb1c9ddd55 ("selftests/bpf: Add BPF ringbuf selftests")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201130223336.904192-1-andrii@kernel.org
Currently verifier enforces return code checks for subprograms in the
same manner as it does for program entry points. This prevents returning
arbitrary scalar values from subprograms. Scalar type of returned values
is checked by btf_prepare_func_args() and hence it should be safe to
allow only scalars for now. Relax return code checks for subprograms and
allow any correct scalar values.
Fixes: 51c39bb1d5 (bpf: Introduce function-by-function verification)
Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <me@ubique.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201113171756.90594-1-me@ubique.spb.ru
If BPF code contains unused BPF subprogram and there are no other subprogram
calls (which can realistically happen in real-world applications given
sufficiently smart Clang code optimizations), libbpf will erroneously assume
that subprograms are entry-point programs and will attempt to load them with
UNSPEC program type.
Fix by not relying on subcall instructions and rather detect it based on the
structure of BPF object's sections.
Fixes: 9a94f277c4 ("tools: libbpf: restore the ability to load programs from .text section")
Reported-by: Dmitrii Banshchikov <dbanschikov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201107000251.256821-1-andrii@kernel.org
Zero-fill element values for all other cpus than current, just as
when not using prealloc. This is the only way the bpf program can
ensure known initial values for all cpus ('onallcpus' cannot be
set when coming from the bpf program).
The scenario is: bpf program inserts some elements in a per-cpu
map, then deletes some (or userspace does). When later adding
new elements using bpf_map_update_elem(), the bpf program can
only set the value of the new elements for the current cpu.
When prealloc is enabled, previously deleted elements are re-used.
Without the fix, values for other cpus remain whatever they were
when the re-used entry was previously freed.
A selftest is added to validate correct operation in above
scenario as well as in case of LRU per-cpu map element re-use.
Fixes: 6c90598174 ("bpf: pre-allocate hash map elements")
Signed-off-by: David Verbeiren <david.verbeiren@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201104112332.15191-1-david.verbeiren@tessares.net
This patch tests all pointers returned by bpf_per_cpu_ptr() must be
tested for NULL first before it can be accessed.
This patch adds a subtest "null_check", so it moves the ".data..percpu"
existence check to the very beginning and before doing any subtest.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201019194225.1051596-1-kafai@fb.com
The tcp_hdr_options test adds a "::eB9F" addr to the lo dev.
However, this non loopback address will have a race on ipv6 dad
which may lead to EADDRNOTAVAIL error from time to time.
Even nodad is used in the iproute2 command, there is still a race in
when the route will be added. This will then lead to ENETUNREACH from
time to time.
To avoid the above, this patch uses the default loopback address "::1"
to do the test.
Fixes: ad2f8eb009 ("bpf: selftests: Tcp header options")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201012234940.1707941-1-kafai@fb.com
The main purpose of the profiler test to check different llvm generation
patterns to make sure the verifier can load these large programs.
Note that profiler.inc.h test doesn't follow strict kernel coding style.
The code was formatted in the kernel style, but variable declarations are
kept as-is to preserve original llvm IR pattern.
profiler1.c should pass with older and newer llvm
profiler[23].c may fail on older llvm that don't have:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85570
because llvm may do speculative code motion optimization that
will generate code like this:
// r9 is a pointer to map_value
// r7 is a scalar
17: bf 96 00 00 00 00 00 00 r6 = r9
18: 0f 76 00 00 00 00 00 00 r6 += r7
19: a5 07 01 00 01 01 00 00 if r7 < 257 goto +1
20: bf 96 00 00 00 00 00 00 r6 = r9
// r6 is used here
The verifier will reject such code with the error:
"math between map_value pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed"
At insn 18 the r7 is indeed unbounded. The later insn 19 checks the bounds and
the insn 20 undoes map_value addition. It is currently impossible for the
verifier to understand such speculative pointer arithmetic. Hence llvm D85570
addresses it on the compiler side.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
The llvm register allocator may use two different registers representing the
same virtual register. In such case the following pattern can be observed:
1047: (bf) r9 = r6
1048: (a5) if r6 < 0x1000 goto pc+1
1050: ...
1051: (a5) if r9 < 0x2 goto pc+66
1052: ...
1053: (bf) r2 = r9 /* r2 needs to have upper and lower bounds */
This is normal behavior of greedy register allocator.
The slides 137+ explain why regalloc introduces such register copy:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/slides/Yatsina-LLVM%20Greedy%20Register%20Allocator.pdf
There is no way to tell llvm 'not to do this'.
Hence the verifier has to recognize such patterns.
In order to track this information without backtracking allocate ID
for scalars in a similar way as it's done for find_good_pkt_pointers().
When the verifier encounters r9 = r6 assignment it will assign the same ID
to both registers. Later if either register range is narrowed via conditional
jump propagate the register state into the other register.
Clear register ID in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() for any alu instruction. The
register ID is ignored for scalars in regsafe() and doesn't affect state
pruning. mark_reg_unknown() clears the ID. It's used to process call, endian
and other instructions. Hence ID is explicitly cleared only in
adjust_reg_min_max_vals() and in 32-bit mov.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201009011240.48506-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Add selftests validating libbpf's auto-resizing of load/store instructions
when used with CO-RE relocations. An explicit and manual approach with using
bpf_core_read() is also demonstrated and tested. Separate BPF program is
supposed to fail due to using signed integers of sizes that differ from
kernel's sizes.
To reliably simulate 32-bit BTF (i.e., the one with sizeof(long) ==
sizeof(void *) == 4), selftest generates its own custom BTF and passes it as
a replacement for real kernel BTF. This allows to test 32/64-bitness mix on
all architectures.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201008001025.292064-5-andrii@kernel.org
Test bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr(). Test two paths in the
kernel. If the base pointer points to a struct, the returned reg is
of type PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Direct pointer dereference can be applied on
the returned variable. If the base pointer isn't a struct, the
returned reg is of type PTR_TO_MEM, which also supports direct pointer
dereference.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929235049.2533242-7-haoluo@google.com
Selftests for typed ksyms. Tests two types of ksyms: one is a struct,
the other is a plain int. This tests two paths in the kernel. Struct
ksyms will be converted into PTR_TO_BTF_ID by the verifier while int
typed ksyms will be converted into PTR_TO_MEM.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929235049.2533242-4-haoluo@google.com
This patch adds a test to ensure the child sk inherited everything
from the bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags of the listen sk:
1. Sets one more cb_flags (BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB_FLAG) to the listen sk
in test_tcp_hdr_options.c
2. Saves the skops->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags when handling the newly
established passive connection
3. CHECK() it is the same as the listen sk
This also covers the fastopen case as the existing test_tcp_hdr_options.c
does.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201002013454.2542367-1-kafai@fb.com
When using -Werror=missing-braces, compiler complains about missing braces.
Let's use use ={} initialization which should do the job:
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c: In function 'test_sockmap_iter':
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c:181:8: error: missing braces around initializer [-Werror=missing-braces]
union bpf_iter_link_info linfo = {0};
^
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c:181:8: error: (near initialization for 'linfo.map') [-Werror=missing-braces]
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockmap_basic.c: At top level:
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201002000451.1794044-1-sdf@google.com
Fixes clang error:
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_noinline.c:35:6: error: variable 'duration' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open_and_load", "failed\n"))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201001225440.1373233-1-sdf@google.com
Add tests for perf event array with and without BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS.
Add a perf event to array via fd mfd. Without BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS, the
perf event is removed when mfd is closed. With BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS, the
perf event is removed when the map is freed.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200930224927.1936644-3-songliubraving@fb.com
Fix a build failure on arm64, due to missing alignment information for
the .BTF_ids section:
resolve_btfids.test.o: in function `test_resolve_btfids':
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c:140:(.text+0x29c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_LDST32_ABS_LO12_NC against `.BTF_ids'
ld: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/resolve_btfids.c:140: warning: one possible cause of this error is that the symbol is being referenced in the indicated code as if it had a larger alignment than was declared where it was defined
In vmlinux, the .BTF_ids section is aligned to 4 bytes by vmlinux.lds.h.
In test_progs however, .BTF_ids doesn't have alignment constraints. The
arm64 linker expects the btf_id_set.cnt symbol, a u32, to be naturally
aligned but finds it misaligned and cannot apply the relocation. Enforce
alignment of .BTF_ids to 4 bytes.
Fixes: cd04b04de1 ("selftests/bpf: Add set test to resolve_btfids")
Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200930093559.2120126-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org
On my systems system() calls are marked with warn_unused_result
apparently. So without error checking we get this warning,
./prog_tests/snprintf_btf.c:30:9: warning: ignoring return value
of ‘system’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result[-Wunused-result]
Also it seems like a good idea to check the return value anyways
to ensure ping exists even if its seems unlikely.
Fixes: 076a95f5af ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_snprintf_btf helper tests")
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160141006897.25201.12095049414156293265.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Adding test that setup following program:
SEC("classifier/test_pkt_md_access")
int test_pkt_md_access(struct __sk_buff *skb)
with its extension:
SEC("freplace/test_pkt_md_access")
int test_pkt_md_access_new(struct __sk_buff *skb)
and tracing that extension with:
SEC("fentry/test_pkt_md_access_new")
int BPF_PROG(fentry, struct sk_buff *skb)
The test verifies that the tracing program can
dereference skb argument properly.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/160138355603.48470.9072073357530773228.stgit@toke.dk
Move existing ASSERT_xxx() macros out of btf_write selftest into test_progs.h
to use across all selftests. Also expand a set of macros for typical cases.
Now there are the following macros:
- ASSERT_EQ() -- check for equality of two integers;
- ASSERT_STREQ() -- check for equality of two C strings;
- ASSERT_OK() -- check for successful (zero) return result;
- ASSERT_ERR() -- check for unsuccessful (non-zero) return result;
- ASSERT_NULL() -- check for NULL pointer;
- ASSERT_OK_PTR() -- check for a valid pointer;
- ASSERT_ERR_PTR() -- check for NULL or negative error encoded in a pointer.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929043046.1324350-2-andriin@fb.com
If programs in prog_tests using skeletons declare the 'skel' variable as
global but not static, that will lead to linker errors on the final link of
the prog_tests binary due to duplicate symbols. Fix a few instances of this.
Fixes: b18c1f0aa4 ("bpf: selftest: Adapt sock_fields test to use skel and global variables")
Fixes: 9a856cae22 ("bpf: selftest: Add test_btf_skc_cls_ingress")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929123026.46751-1-toke@redhat.com
The new test for task iteration in bpf_iter checks (in do_btf_read()) if it
should be skipped due to missing __builtin_btf_type_id. However, this
'skip' verdict is not propagated to the caller, so the parent test will
still fail. Fix this by also skipping the rest of the parent test if the
skip condition was reached.
Fixes: b72091bd4e ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_seq_printf_btf helper")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200929123004.46694-1-toke@redhat.com
