[ Upstream commit 4cbd93c3c110447adc66cb67c08af21f939ae2d7 ]
When running the pidfd_fdinfo_test on arm64, it fails for me. After some
digging, the reason is that the child exits due to SIGBUS, because it
overflows the 1024 byte stack we've reserved for it.
To fix the issue, increase the stack size to 8192 bytes (this number is
somewhat arbitrary, and was arrived at through experimentation -- I kept
doubling until the failure no longer occurred).
Also, let's make the issue easier to debug. wait_for_pid() returns an
ambiguous value: it may return -1 in all of these cases:
1. waitpid() itself returned -1
2. waitpid() returned success, but we found !WIFEXITED(status).
3. The child process exited, but it did so with a -1 exit code.
There's no way for the caller to tell the difference. So, at least log
which occurred, so the test runner can debug things.
While debugging this, I found that we had !WIFEXITED(), because the
child exited due to a signal. This seems like a reasonably common case,
so also print out whether or not we have WIFSIGNALED(), and the
associated WTERMSIG() (if any). This lets us see the SIGBUS I'm fixing
clearly when it occurs.
Finally, I'm suspicious of allocating the child's stack on our stack.
man clone(2) suggests that the correct way to do this is with mmap(),
and in particular by setting MAP_STACK. So, switch to doing it that way
instead.
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Verify that the PIDFD_NONBLOCK flag works with pidfd_open() and that
waitid() with a non-blocking pidfd returns EAGAIN:
TAP version 13
1..3
# Starting 3 tests from 1 test cases.
# RUN global.wait_simple ...
# OK global.wait_simple
ok 1 global.wait_simple
# RUN global.wait_states ...
# OK global.wait_states
ok 2 global.wait_states
# RUN global.wait_nonblock ...
# OK global.wait_nonblock
ok 3 global.wait_nonblock
# PASSED: 3 / 3 tests passed.
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200902102130.147672-5-christian.brauner@ubuntu.com
We recently regressed (cf. [1] and its corresponding fix in [2]) returning
ENOMEM when trying to create a process in a pid namespace whose init
process/child subreaper has already died. This has caused confusion at
least once before that (cf. [3]). Let's add a simple regression test to
catch this in the future.
[1]: 49cb2fc42c ("fork: extend clone3() to support setting a PID")
[2]: b26ebfe12f ("pid: Fix error return value in some cases")
[3]: 35f71bc0a0 ("fork: report pid reservation failure properly")
Cc: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Reber <areber@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
