commit 7ff6edf4fef38ab404ee7861f257e28eaaeed35f upstream.
The AMD side of the loader has always claimed to support mixed
steppings. But somewhere along the way, it broke that by assuming that
the cached patch blob is a single one instead of it being one per
*node*.
So turn it into a per-node one so that each node can stash the blob
relevant for it.
[ NB: Fixes tag is not really the exactly correct one but it is good
enough. ]
Fixes: fe055896c0 ("x86/microcode: Merge the early microcode loader")
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # 2355370cd941 ("x86/microcode/amd: Remove load_microcode_amd()'s bsp parameter")
Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # a5ad92134bd1 ("x86/microcode/AMD: Add a @cpu parameter to the reloading functions")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-4-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e7ad18d1169c62e6c78c01ff693fd362d9d65278 upstream.
Currently, the patch application logic checks whether the revision
needs to be applied on each logical CPU (SMT thread). Therefore, on SMT
designs where the microcode engine is shared between the two threads,
the application happens only on one of them as that is enough to update
the shared microcode engine.
However, there are microcode patches which do per-thread modification,
see Link tag below.
Therefore, drop the revision check and try applying on each thread. This
is what the BIOS does too so this method is very much tested.
Btw, change only the early paths. On the late loading paths, there's no
point in doing per-thread modification because if is it some case like
in the bugzilla below - removing a CPUID flag - the kernel cannot go and
un-use features it has detected are there early. For that, one should
use early loading anyway.
[ bp: Fixes does not contain the oldest commit which did check for
equality but that is good enough. ]
Fixes: 8801b3fcb5 ("x86/microcode/AMD: Rework container parsing")
Reported-by: Ștefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Tested-by: Ștefan Talpalaru <stefantalpalaru@yahoo.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216211
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 712f210a457d9c32414df246a72781550bc23ef6 ]
In preparation for reducing the use of ksize(), record the actual
allocation size for later memcpy(). This avoids copying extra
(uninitialized!) bytes into the patch buffer when the requested
allocation size isn't exactly the size of a kmalloc bucket.
Additionally, fix potential future issues where runtime bounds checking
will notice that the buffer was allocated to a smaller value than
returned by ksize().
Fixes: 757885e94a ("x86, microcode, amd: Early microcode patch loading support for AMD")
Suggested-by: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+DvKQ+bp7Y7gmaVhacjv9uF6Ar-o4tet872h4Q8RPYPJjcJQA@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The load_microcode_amd() function searches for microcode patches and
attempts to apply a microcode patch if it is of different level than the
currently installed level.
While the processor won't actually load a level that is less than
what is already installed, the logic wrongly returns UCODE_NEW thus
signaling to its caller reload_store() that a late loading should be
attempted.
If the file-system contains an older microcode revision than what is
currently running, such a late microcode reload can result in these
misleading messages:
x86/CPU: CPU features have changed after loading microcode, but might not take effect.
x86/CPU: Please consider either early loading through initrd/built-in or a potential BIOS update.
These messages were issued on a system where SME/SEV are not
enabled by the BIOS (MSR C001_0010[23] = 0b) because during boot,
early_detect_mem_encrypt() is called and cleared the SME and SEV
features in this case.
However, after the wrong late load attempt, get_cpu_cap() is called and
reloads the SME and SEV feature bits, resulting in the messages.
Update the microcode level check to not attempt microcode loading if the
current level is greater than(!) and not only equal to the current patch
level.
[ bp: massage commit message. ]
Fixes: 2613f36ed9 ("x86/microcode: Attempt late loading only when new microcode is present")
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/154894518427.9406.8246222496874202773.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net
Currently, the code scanning the CPU equivalence table read from a
microcode container file assumes that it actually contains a terminating
zero entry.
Check also the size of this table to make sure that no reads past its
end happen, in case there's no terminating zero entry at the end of the
table.
[ bp: Adjust to new changes. ]
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107170218.7596-16-bp@alien8.de
Add a verify_patch() function which tries to sanity-check many aspects
of a microcode patch supplied by an outside container before attempting
a load.
Prepend all sub-functions' names which verify an aspect of a microcode
patch with "__".
Call it in verify_and_add_patch() *before* looking at the microcode
header.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107170218.7596-7-bp@alien8.de
Rename the variable which contains the patch size read out from the
section header to sh_psize for better differentiation of all the "sizes"
in that function.
Also, improve the comment above it.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181107170218.7596-6-bp@alien8.de
Add container and patch verification functions to the AMD microcode
update driver.
These functions check whether a passed buffer contains the relevant
structure, whether it isn't truncated and (for actual microcode patches)
whether the size of a patch is not too large for a particular CPU family.
By adding these checks as separate functions the actual microcode loading
code won't get interspersed with a lot of checks and so will be more
readable.
[ bp: Make all pr_err() calls into pr_debug() and drop the
verify_patch() bits. ]
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3014e96c82cd90761b4601bd2cfe59c4119e46a7.1529424596.git.mail@maciej.szmigiero.name
verify_patch_size() verifies whether the remaining size of the microcode
container file is large enough to contain a patch of the indicated size.
However, the section header length is not included in this indicated
size but it is present in the leftover file length so it should be
subtracted from the leftover file length before passing this value to
verify_patch_size().
[ bp: Split comment. ]
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6df43f4f6a28186a13a66e8d7e61143c5e1a2324.1529424596.git.mail@maciej.szmigiero.name
When preparing an MCE record for logging, boot_cpu_data.microcode is used
to read out the microcode revision on the box.
However, on systems where late microcode update has happened, the microcode
revision output in a MCE log record is wrong because
boot_cpu_data.microcode is not updated when the microcode gets updated.
But, the microcode revision saved in boot_cpu_data's microcode member
should be kept up-to-date, regardless, for consistency.
Make it so.
Fixes: fa94d0c6e0 ("x86/MCE: Save microcode revision in machine check records")
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: sironi@amazon.de
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731112739.32338-1-prarit@redhat.com
The file Documentation/x86/early-microcode.txt was renamed to
Documentation/x86/microcode.txt in 0e3258753f, but it was still
referenced by its old name in a three places:
* Documentation/x86/00-INDEX
* arch/x86/Kconfig
* arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
This commit updates these references accordingly.
Fixes: 0e3258753f ("x86/microcode: Document the three loading methods")
Signed-off-by: Jaak Ristioja <jaak@ristioja.ee>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
verify_and_add_patch() allocates memory for a microcode patch and hands
it down to be added to the cache of patches. However, if the cache
already has the latest patch, the newly allocated one needs to be freed
before returning. Do that.
This issue has been found by kmemleak:
unreferenced object 0xffff88010e780b40 (size 32):
comm "bash", pid 860, jiffies 4294690939 (age 29.297s)
backtrace:
kmemleak_alloc
kmem_cache_alloc_trace
load_microcode_amd.isra.0
request_microcode_amd
reload_store
dev_attr_store
sysfs_kf_write
kernfs_fop_write
__vfs_write
vfs_write
SyS_write
do_syscall_64
return_from_SYSCALL_64
0xffffffffffffffff
(gdb) list *0xffffffff81050d60
0xffffffff81050d60 is in load_microcode_amd
(arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:616).
which is this:
patch = kzalloc(sizeof(*patch), GFP_KERNEL);
--> if (!patch) {
pr_err("Patch allocation failure.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
Signed-off-by: Shu Wang <shuwang@redhat.com>
[ Rewrite commit message. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: chuhu@redhat.com
Cc: liwang@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170724101228.17326-2-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The helper function __load_ucode_amd() and pointer intel_ucode_patch do
not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Fixes those sparse warnings:
"symbol '__load_ucode_amd' was not declared. Should it be static?"
"symbol 'intel_ucode_patch' was not declared. Should it be static?"
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170622095736.11937-1-colin.king@canonical.com
With CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled, I get:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1
caller is debug_smp_processor_id
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc2+ #2
Call Trace:
dump_stack
check_preemption_disabled
debug_smp_processor_id
save_microcode_in_initrd_amd
? microcode_init
save_microcode_in_initrd
...
because, well, it says it above, we're using smp_processor_id() in
preemptible code.
But passing the CPU number is not really needed. It is only used to
determine whether we're on the BSP, and, if so, to save the microcode
patch for early loading.
[ We don't absolutely need to do it on the BSP but we do that
customarily there. ]
Instead, convert that function parameter to a boolean which denotes
whether the patch should be saved or not, thereby avoiding the use of
smp_processor_id() in preemptible code.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170528200414.31305-1-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The equivalence ID was needed outside of the container scanning logic
but now, after this has been cleaned up, not anymore. Now, cont_desc.mc
is used to denote whether the container we're looking at has the proper
microcode patch for this CPU or not.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170120202955.4091-17-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
The idea was to not scan the microcode blob on each AP (Application
Processor) during boot and thus save us some milliseconds. However, on
architectures where the microcode engine is shared between threads, this
doesn't work. Here's why:
The microcode on CPU0, i.e., the first thread, gets updated. The second
thread, i.e., CPU1, i.e., the first AP walks into load_ucode_amd_ap(),
sees that there's no container cached and goes and scans for the proper
blob.
It finds it and as a last step of apply_microcode_early_amd(), it tries
to apply the patch but that core has already the updated microcode
revision which it has received through CPU0's update. So it returns
false and we do desc->size = -1 to prevent other APs from scanning.
However, the next AP, CPU2, has a different microcode engine which
hasn't been updated yet. The desc->size == -1 test prevents it from
scanning the blob anew and we fail to update it.
The fix is much more straight-forward than it looks: the BSP
(BootStrapping Processor), i.e., CPU0, caches the microcode patch
in amd_ucode_patch. We use that on the AP and try to apply it.
In the 99.9999% of cases where we have homogeneous cores - *not*
mixed-steppings - the application will be successful and we're good to
go.
In the remaining small set of systems, we will simply rescan the blob
and find (or not, if none present) the proper patch and apply it then.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170120202955.4091-16-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
It was pretty clumsy before and the whole work of parsing the microcode
containers was spread around the functions wrongly.
Clean it up so that there's a main scan_containers() function which
iterates over the microcode blob and picks apart the containers glued
together. For each container, it calls a parse_container() helper which
concentrates on one container only: sanity-checking, parsing, counting
microcode patches in there, etc.
It makes much more sense now and it is actually very readable. Oh, and
we luvz a diffstat removing more crap than adding.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170120202955.4091-8-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Make it into a container descriptor which is being passed around and
stores important info like the matching container and the patch for the
current CPU. Make it static too.
Later patches will use this and thus get rid of a double container
parsing.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170120202955.4091-7-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
No need to have it marked "inline" - let gcc decide. Also, shorten the
argument name and simplify while-test.
While at it, make it into a proper for-loop and simplify it even more,
as tglx suggests.
No functionality change.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170120202955.4091-5-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
