commit bff8f413c71ffc3cb679dbd9a5632b33af563f9f upstream.
Currently call_undef_hook() is used to handle UNDEFINED exceptions from
EL0 and EL1. As support for deprecated instructions may be enabled
independently, the handlers for individual instructions are organised as
a linked list of struct undef_hook which can be manipulated dynamically.
As this can be manipulated dynamically, the list is protected with a
raw_spinlock which must be acquired when handling UNDEFINED exceptions
or when manipulating the list of handlers.
This locking is unfortunate as it serialises handling of UNDEFINED
exceptions, and requires RCU to be enabled for lockdep, requiring the
use of RCU_NONIDLE() in resume path of cpu_suspend() since commit:
a2c42bbabbe260b7 ("arm64: spectre: Prevent lockdep splat on v4 mitigation enable path")
The list of UNDEFINED handlers largely consist of handlers for
exceptions taken from EL0, and the only handler for exceptions taken
from EL1 handles `MSR SSBS, #imm` on CPUs which feature PSTATE.SSBS but
lack the corresponding MSR (Immediate) instruction. Other than this we
never expect to take an UNDEFINED exception from EL1 in normal
operation.
This patch reworks do_el0_undef() to invoke the EL1 SSBS handler
directly, relegating call_undef_hook() to only handle EL0 UNDEFs. This
removes redundant work to iterate the list for EL1 UNDEFs, and removes
the need for locking, permitting EL1 UNDEFs to be handled in parallel
without contention.
The RCU_NONIDLE() call in cpu_suspend() will be removed in a subsequent
patch, as there are other potential issues with the use of
instrumentable code and RCU in the CPU suspend code.
I've tested this by forcing the detection of SSBS on a CPU that doesn't
have it, and verifying that the try_emulate_el1_ssbs() callback is
invoked.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221019144123.612388-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 58c9a5060cb7cd529d49c93954cdafe81c1d642a upstream.
The mitigations for Spectre-BHB are only applied when an exception is
taken from user-space. The mitigation status is reported via the spectre_v2
sysfs vulnerabilities file.
When unprivileged eBPF is enabled the mitigation in the exception vectors
can be avoided by an eBPF program.
When unprivileged eBPF is enabled, print a warning and report vulnerable
via the sysfs vulnerabilities file.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 228a26b912287934789023b4132ba76065d9491c upstream.
Future CPUs may implement a clearbhb instruction that is sufficient
to mitigate SpectreBHB. CPUs that implement this instruction, but
not CSV2.3 must be affected by Spectre-BHB.
Add support to use this instruction as the BHB mitigation on CPUs
that support it. The instruction is in the hint space, so it will
be treated by a NOP as older CPUs.
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
[ modified for stable: Use a KVM vector template instead of alternatives,
removed bitmap of mitigations ]
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 558c303c9734af5a813739cd284879227f7297d2 upstream.
Speculation attacks against some high-performance processors can
make use of branch history to influence future speculation.
When taking an exception from user-space, a sequence of branches
or a firmware call overwrites or invalidates the branch history.
The sequence of branches is added to the vectors, and should appear
before the first indirect branch. For systems using KPTI the sequence
is added to the kpti trampoline where it has a free register as the exit
from the trampoline is via a 'ret'. For systems not using KPTI, the same
register tricks are used to free up a register in the vectors.
For the firmware call, arch-workaround-3 clobbers 4 registers, so
there is no choice but to save them to the EL1 stack. This only happens
for entry from EL0, so if we take an exception due to the stack access,
it will not become re-entrant.
For KVM, the existing branch-predictor-hardening vectors are used.
When a spectre version of these vectors is in use, the firmware call
is sufficient to mitigate against Spectre-BHB. For the non-spectre
versions, the sequence of branches is added to the indirect vector.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
[ modified for stable, removed bitmap of mitigations, use kvm template
infrastructure ]
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 5bdf3437603d4af87f9c7f424b0c8aeed2420745 upstream.
CPUs vulnerable to Spectre-BHB either need to make an SMC-CC firmware
call from the vectors, or run a sequence of branches. This gets added
to the hyp vectors. If there is no support for arch-workaround-1 in
firmware, the indirect vector will be used.
kvm_init_vector_slots() only initialises the two indirect slots if
the platform is vulnerable to Spectre-v3a. pKVM's hyp_map_vectors()
only initialises __hyp_bp_vect_base if the platform is vulnerable to
Spectre-v3a.
As there are about to more users of the indirect vectors, ensure
their entries in hyp_spectre_vector_selector[] are always initialised,
and __hyp_bp_vect_base defaults to the regular VA mapping.
The Spectre-v3a check is moved to a helper
kvm_system_needs_idmapped_vectors(), and merged with the code
that creates the hyp mappings.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit dee435be76f4117410bbd90573a881fd33488f37 upstream.
Speculation attacks against some high-performance processors can
make use of branch history to influence future speculation as part of
a spectre-v2 attack. This is not mitigated by CSV2, meaning CPUs that
previously reported 'Not affected' are now moderately mitigated by CSV2.
Update the value in /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2
to also show the state of the BHB mitigation.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1b33d4860deaecf1d8eec3061b7e7ed7ab0bae8d upstream.
The spectre-v4 sequence includes an SMC from the assembly entry code.
spectre_v4_patch_fw_mitigation_conduit is the patching callback that
generates an HVC or SMC depending on the SMCCC conduit type.
As this isn't specific to spectre-v4, rename it
smccc_patch_fw_mitigation_conduit so it can be re-used.
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
According to the SMCCC spec[1](7.5.2 Discovery) the
ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 function id only returns 0, 1, and
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED.
0 is "workaround required and safe to call this function"
1 is "workaround not required but safe to call this function"
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is "might be vulnerable or might not be, who knows, I give up!"
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED might as well mean "workaround required, except
calling this function may not work because it isn't implemented in some
cases". Wonderful. We map this SMC call to
0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE
For KVM hypercalls (hvc), we've implemented this function id to return
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED, 0, and SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED. One of those
isn't supposed to be there. Per the code we call
arm64_get_spectre_v2_state() to figure out what to return for this
feature discovery call.
0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE
Let's clean this up so that KVM tells the guest this mapping:
0 is SPECTRE_MITIGATED
1 is SPECTRE_UNAFFECTED
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED is SPECTRE_VULNERABLE
Note: SMCCC_RET_NOT_AFFECTED is 1 but isn't part of the SMCCC spec
Fixes: c118bbb527 ("arm64: KVM: Propagate full Spectre v2 workaround state to KVM guests")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/latest [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201023154751.1973872-1-swboyd@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Spectre-v2 can be mitigated on Falkor CPUs either by calling into
firmware or by issuing a magic, CPU-specific sequence of branches.
Although the latter is faster, the size of the code sequence means that
it cannot be used in the EL2 vectors, and so there is a need for both
mitigations to co-exist in order to achieve optimal performance.
Change the mitigation selection logic for Spectre-v2 so that the
CPU-specific mitigation is used only when the firmware mitigation is
also available, rather than when a firmware mitigation is unavailable.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC option to the PR_SPEC_STORE_BYPASS prctl()
allows the SSB mitigation to be enabled only until the next execve(),
at which point the state will revert back to PR_SPEC_ENABLE and the
mitigation will be disabled.
Add support for PR_SPEC_DISABLE_NOEXEC on arm64.
Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The kbuild robot reports that we're relying on an implicit inclusion to
get a definition of task_stack_page() in the Spectre-v4 mitigation code,
which is not always in place for some configurations:
| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'task_stack_page' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
| task_pt_regs(task)->pstate |= val;
| ^
| arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:268:36: note: expanded from macro 'task_pt_regs'
| ((struct pt_regs *)(THREAD_SIZE + task_stack_page(p)) - 1)
| ^
| arch/arm64/kernel/proton-pack.c:329:2: note: did you mean 'task_spread_page'?
Add the missing include to fix the build error.
Fixes: a44acf477220 ("arm64: Move SSBD prctl() handler alongside other spectre mitigation code")
Reported-by: Anthony Steinhauser <asteinhauser@google.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009260013.Ul7AD29w%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Patching the EL2 exception vectors is integral to the Spectre-v2
workaround, where it can be necessary to execute CPU-specific sequences
to nobble the branch predictor before running the hypervisor text proper.
Remove the dependency on CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE and allow the EL2 vectors
to be patched even when KASLR is not enabled.
Fixes: 7a132017e7a5 ("KVM: arm64: Replace CONFIG_KVM_INDIRECT_VECTORS with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202009221053.Jv1XsQUZ%lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Rewrite the Spectre-v4 mitigation handling code to follow the same
approach as that taken by Spectre-v2.
For now, report to KVM that the system is vulnerable (by forcing
'ssbd_state' to ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN), as this will be cleared up in
subsequent steps.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
As part of the spectre consolidation effort to shift all of the ghosts
into their own proton pack, move all of the horrible SSBD prctl() code
out of its own 'ssbd.c' file.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The Spectre-v2 mitigation code is pretty unwieldy and hard to maintain.
This is largely due to it being written hastily, without much clue as to
how things would pan out, and also because it ends up mixing policy and
state in such a way that it is very difficult to figure out what's going
on.
Rewrite the Spectre-v2 mitigation so that it clearly separates state from
policy and follows a more structured approach to handling the mitigation.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The spectre mitigation code is spread over a few different files, which
makes it both hard to follow, but also hard to remove it should we want
to do that in future.
Introduce a new file for housing the spectre mitigations, and populate
it with the spectre-v1 reporting code to start with.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
