- Various fixes that make surviving concurrent piglit more possible.
- Buffer object deletion no longer synchronous
- Context/register initialisation updates that have been reported to
solve some stability issues (particularly on some problematic GF119
chips)
- Kernel side support for VP2 video decoding engines
* 'drm-nouveau-next' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/nouveau/linux-2.6: (44 commits)
drm/nvd0-/disp: handle case where display engine is missing/disabled
drm/gr/nvc0-: merge nvc0/nve0 ucode, and use cpp instead of m4
drm/nouveau/bsp/nv84: initial vp2 engine implementation
drm/nouveau/vp/nv84: initial vp2 engine implementation
drm/nouveau/core: xtensa engine base class implementation
drm/nouveau/vdec: fork vp3 implementations from vp2
drm/nouveau/core: move falcon class to engine/
drm/nouveau/kms: don't fail if there's no dcb table entries
drm/nouveau: remove limit on gart
drm/nouveau/vm: perform a bar flush when flushing vm
drm/nvc0/gr: cleanup register lists, and add nvce/nvcf to switches
drm/nvc8/gr: update initial register/context values
drm/nvc4/gr: update initial register/context values
drm/nvc1/gr: update initial register/context values
drm/nvc3/gr: update initial register/context values
drm/nvc0/gr: update initial register/context values
drm/nvd9/gr: update initial register/context values
drm/nve4/gr: update initial register/context values
drm/nvc0-/gr: bump maximum gpc/tpc limits
drm/nvf0/gr: initial register/context setup
...
Not really "core" per-se. About to merge Ilia's work adding another
similar class for the VP2 xtensa engines, so, seems like a good time to
move all these to engine/.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Most graphics cards nowadays have a multiple of this limit as their vram,
so limiting GART doesn't seem to make much sense.
Signed-off-by: Maarten >Lnkhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Appears to fix the regression from "drm/nvc0/vm: handle bar tlb flushes
internally".
nvidia always seems to do this flush after writing values.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
nvc0_vm_flush() accesses the pgd list, which will soon be able to race
with vm_unlink() during channel destruction.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These operations can take quite some time, and we really don't want to
have to hold a spinlock for too long.
Now that the lock ordering for vm and the gr/nv84 hw bug workaround has
been reversed, it's possible to use a mutex here.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Helps us to get identical numbers to the binary driver for (at least)
Kepler memory PLLs, and fixes a rounding error.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
And, will depend on FB/VOLT/DAEMON being ready when it gets initialised
so that it can set/restore clocks.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
These are pretty much useless for reclocking purposes. Lets make it
clearer what they're for and move them to DEVINIT to signify they're
for the very simple PLL setting requirements of running the init
tables.
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Because calling intel_dp_encoder_destroy inside
intel_edp_init_connector is just wrong. This is the initialization
path, so we should properly unwind all the initialization through the
whole caller stack.
On the intel_dp_encoder_destroy function we do the following:
1 - Call i2c_del_adapter
2 - Call drm_encoder_cleanup
3 - If edp:
3.1 - Cancel panel_vdd_work
3.2 - Call ironlake_panel_vdd_of_sync
4 - Free the encoder
And here is how we unwind each specific step:
1 - We have intel_dp_init_connector -> intel_dp_i2c_init ->
i2c_dp_aux_add_bus -> i2c_add_adapter, so we call
i2c_del_dapter at intel_dp_init_connector
2 - Call it in the same function that called drm_encoder_init
3 - Call it in the same function that called INIT_DELAYED_WORK
4 - Free it in the same function that allocated it
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zoltan Nyul <zoltan.nyul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because calling intel_dp_destroy inside intel_edp_init_connector is
just wrong. This is the initialization path, so we should properly
unwind all the initialization through the whole caller stack.
On the intel_dp_destroy function we do the following:
1 - Free edid if it exists
2 - Call intel_panel_fini in case it's eDP
3 - Call drm_sysfs_connector_remove
4 - Call drm_connector_cleanup
5 - Free the connector
And here is how we unwind each specific step:
1 - No need as we still didn't assign anything
2 - No need as we still didn't call intel_panel_init
3 - Call it in the same function that called drm_sysfs_connector_add
4 - Call it in the same function that called drm_connector_init
5 - Free it in the same function that allocated it
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zoltan Nyul <zoltan.nyul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>