For commands that doesn't involve to prepare a data transfer, owl-mmc is
using a fixed 30s response timeout. This is a bit problematic.
For some commands it means waiting longer than needed for the completion to
expire, which may not a big issue, but still. For other commands, like for
an erase (CMD38) that uses a R1B response, may require longer timeouts than
30s. In these cases, we may end up treating the command as it failed, while
it just needed some more time to complete successfully.
Fix the problem by respecting the cmd->busy_timeout, which is provided by
the mmc core.
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414161413.3036-8-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Some commands uses R1B responses, which means the card may assert the DAT0
line to signal busy for a period of time, after it has received the
command. The mmc core normally specifies the busy period for the command in
the cmd->busy_timeout. Ideally the driver should respect it, but that
requires quite some update of the code, so let's defer that to someone with
the HW at hand.
Instead, let's inform the mmc core about the maximum supported busy timeout
in ->max_busy_timeout during ->probe(). This value corresponds to the fixed
5s timeout used by jz4740. In this way, we let the mmc core validate the
needed timeout, which may lead to that it converts from a R1B into a R1
response and then use CMD13 to poll for busy completion.
In other words, this change enables support for commands with longer busy
periods than 5s, like erase (CMD38) for example.
Cc: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414161413.3036-5-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Fix the following sparse warning:
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c:497:6: warning: symbol
'sdhci_pci_o2_set_clock' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c:512:5: warning: symbol
'sdhci_pci_o2_probe_slot' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c:581:5: warning: symbol
'sdhci_pci_o2_probe' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-o2micro.c:786:5: warning: symbol
'sdhci_pci_o2_resume' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1587624199-96926-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This patch fix a power-on issue, and avoid to retry the power sequence.
In power off sequence: sdmmc must set pwr_reg in "power-cycle" state
(value 0x2), to prevent the card from being supplied through the signal
lines (all the lines are driven low).
In power on sequence: when the power is stable, sdmmc must set pwr_reg
in "power-off" state (value 0x0) to drive all signal to high before to
set "power-on".
To avoid writing the same value to the power register several times, this
register is cached by the pwr_reg variable. At probe pwr_reg is initialized
to 0 by kzalloc of mmc_alloc_host.
Like pwr_reg value is 0 at probing, the power on sequence fail because
the "power-off" state is not writes (value 0x0) and the lines
remain drive to low.
This patch initializes "pwr_reg" variable with power register value.
This it done in sdmmc variant init to not disturb default mmci behavior.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420161831.5043-1-ludovic.barre@st.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Some commands uses R1B responses, which means the card may assert the DAT0
line to signal busy for a period of time, after it has received the
command. The mmc core normally specifies the busy period for the command in
the cmd->busy_timeout. Ideally the driver should respect it, but that
requires quite some update of the code, so let's defer that to someone with
the HW at hand.
Instead, let's inform the mmc core about the maximum supported busy timeout
in ->max_busy_timeout during ->probe(). This value corresponds to the fixed
4s timeout used by usdhi6rol0. In this way, we let the mmc core validate
the needed timeout, which may lead to that it converts from a R1B into a R1
response and then use CMD13 to poll for busy completion.
In other words, this change enables support for commands with longer busy
periods than 4s, like erase (CMD38) for example.
Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Cc: Lars Persson <lars.persson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414161413.3036-6-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Using a fixed 2s timeout for all commands is a bit problematic.
For some commands it means waiting longer than needed for the timer to
expire, which may not a big issue, but still. For other commands, like for
an erase (CMD38) that uses a R1B response, may require longer timeouts than
2s. In these cases, we may end up treating the command as it failed, while
it just needed some more time to complete successfully.
Fix the problem by respecting the cmd->busy_timeout, which is provided by
the mmc core.
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200414161413.3036-4-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
When use one SDIO wifi which enable the runtime PM feature on i.MX6SX,
we meet system hang. This hang happened during the usdhc runtime resume,
in sdhci_init(), when call the sdhci_set_default_irqs. One interrupt
(SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT) triggered just after the host->ier update and before
the write of register SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE. So in sdhci_irq, it will skip
the call of sdio_signal_irq() because current host->ier do not set the
SDHCI_INT_CARD_INT. So this SDIO wifi interrupt always keep triggered,
let the system stuck in irq handle, can't response any other thread.
This patch add spin lock for the sdhci_set_default_irqs to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1586941255-9237-1-git-send-email-haibo.chen@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The SD host controller can process one request in the atomic context if
the card is nonremovable, which means we can submit next request in the
irq hard handler when using the MMC host software queue to reduce the
latency. Thus this patch adds a new API request_atomic() for the host
controller, as well as adding support for host software queue to submit
a request by the new request_atomic() API.
Moreover there is an unusual case that the card is busy when trying to
send a command, and we can not polling the card status in interrupt
context by using request_atomic() to dispatch requests. Thus we should
queue a work to try again in the non-atomic context in case the host
releases the busy signal later.
Suggested-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a344e27e506cb2329073cbd5cf65e15cc3cbeba9.1586744073.git.baolin.wang7@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Spending time under spinlock increases IRQ latencies and also
response times because preemption is disabled.
sdhci_send_command() waits up to 10 ms under spinlock for inhibit bits
to clear. In general inhibit bits will not be set, but there may be
corner cases, especially in the face of errors, where waiting helps.
There might also be dysfunctional hardware that needs the waiting. So
retain the legacy behaviour but do not wait for inhibit bits while under
spinlock. Instead adjust the logic to enable waiting while not under
spinlock. That is mostly straight forward, but in the interrupt handler
it requires deferring an "inhibited" command to the IRQ thread where
sleeping is allowed.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200412090349.1607-6-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Instead of reimplementing the logic in mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc(), use the
mmc code function directly.
This also allows us to fix a related issue on STM32MP1, when a voltage
switch of 1.8V is done for the eMMC, but the current level is already set
to 1.8V. More precisely, in this scenario the call to the
->post_sig_volt_switch() hangs, indefinitely waiting for the voltage switch
to complete. Fix this problem by checking if mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc()
returned 1 and then skip invoking the callback.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200416163649.336967-3-marex@denx.de
[Ulf: Updated the commit message]
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Patch all drivers which use mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() and prepare them for
the fact that mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc() can return a value > 0, which would
happen if the signal voltage switch did NOT happen, because the voltage was
already set correctly.
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200416163649.336967-1-marex@denx.de
[Ulf: Re-worked/simplified the code a bit]
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Clang warns:
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c:784:9: warning: variable 'ret' is
uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
return ret;
^~~
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c:738:9: note: initialize the variable
'ret' to silence this warning
int ret;
^
= 0
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c:860:9: warning: variable 'ret' is
uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
return ret;
^~~
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c:810:9: note: initialize the variable
'ret' to silence this warning
int ret;
^
= 0
2 warnings generated.
This looks like a copy paste error. Neither function has handling that
needs ret so just remove it and return 0 directly.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/996
Reported-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200416182402.16858-1-natechancellor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
In the SDHCI specification, the Capabilities Register (Offset 0x40h)
is the 64-bit width register, but in Linux, it is represented as two
registers, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES and SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1 so that drivers
can use 32-bit register accessors.
The upper 32-bit field is associated with SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1.
Move the definition of SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1 to the correct place.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200408072105.422-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The data structure member “rpmb->md” was passed to a call of the function
“mmc_blk_put” after a call of the function “put_device”. Reorder these
function calls to keep the data accesses consistent.
Fixes: 1c87f73578 ("mmc: block: Fix bug when removing RPMB chardev ")
Signed-off-by: Peng Hao <richard.peng@oppo.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[Uffe: Fixed up mangled patch and updated commit message]
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
First, it should be noted that the CQE timeout (60 seconds) is substantial
so a CQE request that times out is really stuck, and the race between
timeout and completion is extremely unlikely. Nevertheless this patch
fixes an issue with it.
Commit ad73d6fead ("mmc: complete requests from ->timeout")
preserved the existing functionality, to complete the request.
However that had only been necessary because the block layer
timeout handler had been marking the request to prevent it from being
completed normally. That restriction was removed at the same time, the
result being that a request that has gone will have been completed anyway.
That is, the completion was unnecessary.
At the time, the unnecessary completion was harmless because the block
layer would ignore it, although that changed in kernel v5.0.
Note for stable, this patch will not apply cleanly without patch "mmc:
core: Fix recursive locking issue in CQE recovery path"
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Fixes: ad73d6fead ("mmc: complete requests from ->timeout")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200508062227.23144-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Consider the following stack trace
-001|raw_spin_lock_irqsave
-002|mmc_blk_cqe_complete_rq
-003|__blk_mq_complete_request(inline)
-003|blk_mq_complete_request(rq)
-004|mmc_cqe_timed_out(inline)
-004|mmc_mq_timed_out
mmc_mq_timed_out acquires the queue_lock for the first
time. The mmc_blk_cqe_complete_rq function also tries to acquire
the same queue lock resulting in recursive locking where the task
is spinning for the same lock which it has already acquired leading
to watchdog bark.
Fix this issue with the lock only for the required critical section.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 1e8e55b670 ("mmc: block: Add CQE support")
Suggested-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sarthak Garg <sartgarg@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1588868135-31783-1-git-send-email-vbadigan@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
