ACPI 5.0 provides extensions to the EINJ mechanism to specify the
target for the error injection - by APICID for cpu related errors,
by address for memory related errors, and by segment/bus/device/function
for PCIe related errors. Also extensions for vendor specific error
injections.
Tested-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Current fix for resource conflict is to remove the address region <param1 &
param2, ~param2+1> from trigger resource, which is highly relies on valid user
input. This patch is trying to avoid such potential issues by fetching the
exact address region from trigger action table entry.
Signed-off-by: Xiao, Hui <hui.xiao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some APEI firmware implementation will access injected address
specified in param1 to trigger the error when injecting memory error.
This will cause resource conflict with RAM.
On one of our testing machine, if injecting at memory address
0x10000000, the following error will be reported in dmesg:
APEI: Can not request iomem region <0000000010000000-0000000010000008> for GARs.
This patch removes the injecting memory address range from trigger
table resources to avoid conflict.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
EINJ parameter support is only usable for some specific BIOS.
Originally, it is expected to have no harm for BIOS does not support
it. But now, we found it will cause issue (memory overwriting) for
some BIOS. So param support is disabled by default and only enabled
when newly added module parameter named "param_extension" is
explicitly specified.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch changes APEI EINJ and ERST to use apei_exec_run for
mandatory actions, and apei_exec_run_optional for optional actions.
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
On Huang Ying's machine:
erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj)
but Yinghai reported that on his machine,
erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj) -
sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)
To make erst table size checking code works on all systems, both
testing are treated as PASS.
Same situation applies to einj_tab->header_length, so corresponding
table size checking is changed in similar way too.
v2:
- Treat both table size as valid
Originally-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some hardware error injection needs parameters, for example, it is
useful to specify memory address and memory address mask for memory
errors.
Some BIOSes allow parameters to be specified via an unpublished
extension. This patch adds support to it. The parameters will be
ignored on machines without necessary BIOS support.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
EINJ provides a hardware error injection mechanism, this is useful for
debugging and testing of other APEI and RAS features.
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
