There is an upper bound to the value that a watermark may hold. That
upper bound is not immediately obvious during configuration, and it
might be possible to have accidental truncation.
Actually this has happened already, add a warning to prevent it from
happening again.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The IS2 IP4_TCP_UDP key offsets do not correspond to the VSC7514
datasheet. Whether they work or not is unknown to me. On VSC9959 and
VSC9953, with the same mistake and same discrepancy from the
documentation, tc-flower src_port and dst_port rules did not work, so I
am assuming the same is true here.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently mscc_ocelot_init_ports() will skip initializing a port when it
doesn't have a phy-handle, so the ocelot->ports[port] pointer will be
NULL. Take this into consideration when tearing down the driver, and add
a new function ocelot_deinit_port() to the switch library, mirror of
ocelot_init_port(), which needs to be called by the driver for all ports
it has initialized.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
mscc_ocelot_probe() is already pretty large and hard to follow. So move
the code for parsing ports in a separate function.
This makes it easier for the next patch to just call
mscc_ocelot_release_ports from the error path of mscc_ocelot_init_ports.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The VSC7514 is marketed as a 10-port switch, however it has 11 physical
ports (0->10) in the block diagram:
https://www.microsemi.com/product-directory/ethernet-switches/3992-vsc7514
(also in the device tree at arch/mips/boot/dts/mscc/ocelot.dtsi)
Additionally, by architecture it has one more entry in the analyzer
block, situated right after the physical ports, for the CPU port module.
This is not a physical port, it only represents a channel for frame
injection and extraction. That entry for the CPU port is at index 11 in
the analyzer.
When the register groups for QSYS_SWITCH_PORT_MODE, SYS_PORT_MODE and
SYS_PAUSE_CFG are declared to be replicated 11 times, the 11th entry in
the array of regfields is not initialized, so the CPU port module is not
initialized either.
The documentation of QSYS_SWITCH_PORT_MODE for VSC7514 also says that
this register group is replicated 12 times, so this patch is simply
reflecting that and not introducing any further inconsistency.
Fixes: 886e1387c7 ("net: mscc: ocelot: convert QSYS_SWITCH_PORT_MODE and SYS_PORT_MODE to regfields")
Fixes: 541132f096 ("net: mscc: ocelot: convert SYS_PAUSE_CFG register access to regfield")
Reported-by: Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whitehead@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The ocelot_wm_encode function deals with setting thresholds for pause
frame start and stop. In Ocelot and Felix the register layout is the
same, but for Seville, it isn't. The easiest way to accommodate Seville
hardware configuration is to introduce a function pointer for setting
this up.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Currently Felix and Ocelot share the same bit layout in these per-port
registers, but Seville does not. So we need reg_fields for that.
Actually since these are per-port registers, we need to also specify the
number of ports, and register size per port, and use the regmap API for
multiple ports.
There's a more subtle point to be made about the other 2 register
fields:
- QSYS_SWITCH_PORT_MODE_SCH_NEXT_CFG
- QSYS_SWITCH_PORT_MODE_INGRESS_DROP_MODE
which we are not writing any longer, for 2 reasons:
- Using the previous API (ocelot_write_rix), we were only writing 1 for
Felix and Ocelot, which was their hardware-default value, and which
there wasn't any intention in changing.
- In the case of SCH_NEXT_CFG, in fact Seville does not have this
register field at all, and therefore, if we want to have common code
we would be required to not write to it.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add the register definitions for the MSCC MIIM MDIO controller in
preparation for seville_vsc9959.c to create its accessors for the
internal MDIO bus.
Since we've introduced elements to ocelot_regfields that are not
instantiated by felix and ocelot, we need to define the size of the
regfields arrays explicitly, otherwise ocelot_regfields_init, which
iterates up to REGFIELD_MAX, will fault on the undefined regfield
entries (if we're lucky).
Signed-off-by: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
At the moment, there are some minimal register differences between
VSC7514 Ocelot and VSC9959 Felix. To be precise, the PCS1G registers are
missing from Felix because it was integrated with an NXP PCS.
But with VSC9953 Seville (not yet introduced), the register differences
are more pronounced. The MAC registers are located at different offsets
within the DEV_GMII target. So we need to refactor the driver to keep a
regmap even for per-port registers. The callers of the ocelot_port_readl
and ocelot_port_writel were kept unchanged, only the implementation is
now more generic.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
ocelot_regs.c actually shouldn't be part of the common library. It
describes the register map of the VSC7514 switch. The way ocelot
switches work, they'll have highly optimized register maps, so another
SoC will likely have the same registers but laid out completely
different in memory (so there's little room for reusing this structure).
So move it to ocelot_vsc7514.c instead.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To follow the model of felix and seville where we have one
platform-specific file, rename this file to the actual SoC it serves.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
