Historically, CPU and Codec were implemented different, but now it is
merged as Component.
ALSA SoC is supporting suspend/resume at DAI and Component level.
The method is like below.
1) Suspend/Resume all CPU DAI if bus-control was 0
2) Suspend/Resume all Component
3) Suspend/Resume all CPU DAI if bus-control was 1
Historically 2) was Codec special operation.
Because CPU and Codec were merged into Component,
CPU suspend/resume has 3 chance to suspend(= 1/2/3), but
Codec suspend/resume has 1 chance (= 2).
Here, DAI side suspend/resume is caring bus-control, but no driver
which is supporting suspend/resume is setting bus-control.
This means 3) was never used.
Here, used parameter for suspend/resume component->dev and dai->dev are
same pointer.
For that reason, we can merge DAI and Component suspend/resume.
One note is that we should use 2), because it is caring BIAS level.
This patch removes 1) and 3).
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r1zvx7i8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
ALSA SoC need to care pinctrl_pm_select_xxx().
It is called at soc-core and soc-pcm.
soc-pcm is controlling it for activate DAI.
soc-core is controlling it for whole system
(= suspend/resume/probe/poweroff).
If we focus to soc-core side, it need to care about BIAS level.
Then, snd_soc_suspend() only is controlling it by Component base (a).
Other functions are DAI base (b).
(a) pinctrl_pm_select_xxx(component->dev, xxx);
(b) pinctrl_pm_select_xxx(dai->dev, xxx);
Because of these unbalance, the code is confusable.
Here, dai->dev and component->dev are same pointer.
Thus, we can replace it component base.
One note here is that it cared DAI (= CPU/Codec) pin before this patch,
after this patch, it cares Component (= CPU/Codec/Platform) pin.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874kx4t4v6.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
snd_soc_suspend() are doing below for pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state()
int snd_soc_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
...
for_each_card_components(card, component) {
...
(1) pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(component->dev);
}
for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {
...
(2) pinctrl_pm_select_sleep_state(cpu_dai->dev);
}
}
(1) is called for all component (CPU/Codec/Platform), and
(2) is called for CPU DAIs.
Here, component->dev is same as dai->dev.
This means, it is called in duplicate on CPU case.
This patch removes (2).
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875zhkt4vc.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Current ALSA SoC is using struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list to
connecting component to rtd by using list_head.
struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list {
struct snd_soc_component *component;
struct list_head list; /* rtd::component_list */
};
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime {
...
struct list_head component_list; /* list of connected components */
...
};
The CPU/Codec/Platform component which will be connected to rtd (a)
is indicated via dai_link at snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime()
int snd_soc_add_pcm_runtime(...)
{
...
/* Find CPU from registered CPUs */
rtd->cpu_dai = snd_soc_find_dai(dai_link->cpus);
...
(a) snd_soc_rtdcom_add(rtd, rtd->cpu_dai->component);
...
/* Find CODEC from registered CODECs */
(b) for_each_link_codecs(dai_link, i, codec) {
rtd->codec_dais[i] = snd_soc_find_dai(codec);
...
(a) snd_soc_rtdcom_add(rtd, rtd->codec_dais[i]->component);
}
...
/* Find PLATFORM from registered PLATFORMs */
(b) for_each_link_platforms(dai_link, i, platform) {
for_each_component(component) {
...
(a) snd_soc_rtdcom_add(rtd, component);
}
}
}
It shows, it is possible to know how many components will be
connected to rtd by using
dai_link->num_cpus
dai_link->num_codecs
dai_link->num_platforms
If so, we can use component pointer array instead of list_head,
in such case, code can be more simple.
This patch removes struct snd_soc_rtdcom_list that is only
of temporary value, and convert to pointer array.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a76wt4wm.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
The error path of soc_new_pcm_runtime() invokes soc_free_pcm_runtime()
that may cause a few problems. First off, it calls list_del() for
rtd->list that may not be initialized. Similarly,
snd_soc_pcm_component_free() traverses over the component list that
may not be initialized, either. Such access to the uninitialized list
head would lead to either a BUG_ON() or a memory corruption.
This patch fixes the access to uninitialized list heads by
initializing the list heads properly at the beginning before those
error paths.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204151454.21643-1-tiwai@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
When converting a normal link to a DPCM link we need
to set dpcm_playback / dpcm_capture otherwise playback/capture
streams will not be created resulting in errors like this:
[ 36.039111] sai1-wm8960-hifi: ASoC: no backend playback stream
Fixes: a655de808c ("ASoC: core: Allow topology to override machine driver FE DAI link config")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204151333.26625-1-daniel.baluta@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Sound card disconnecting operation was needed when "sound driver" was
unbinded without unbinding "sound card".
In such case, sound driver should be stopped even though it was
playbacking/capturing. Otherwise clock open/close counter mismatch happen.
One headache was that we can't skip unbind in error case because unbind
operation doesn't check return value from each drivers.
snd_soc_disconnect_sync() was added for these purpose, and Renesas
sound card only is used it.
But now, ALSA SoC automatically disconnect sound card when sound driver
was unbinded. Thus, snd_soc_disconnect_sync() is no longer needed.
This patch removes it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87eexdyq6p.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
There are many paths to soc_free_pcm_runtime which can both have and
have not yet inited the workqueue yet. When we flush the queue when we
have not yet inited the queue we cause warnings to be printed.
An example is soc_cleanup_card_resources which is called by
snd_soc_bind_card which has multiple failure points before and after
soc_link_init -> soc_new_pcm which is where the queue is inited.
Signed-off-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191128011358.39234-1-cujomalainey@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc-topology adds extra dai_link by using snd_soc_add_dai_link(),
and removes it by snd_soc_romove_dai_link().
This snd_soc_add/remove_dai_link() and/or its related
functions are unbalanced before, and now, these are balance-uped.
But, it finds the random operation issue, and it is reported by
Pierre-Louis.
When card was released, topology will call snd_soc_remove_dai_link()
via (A).
static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
{
struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;
/* This should be called before snd_card_free() */
(A) soc_remove_link_components(card);
/* free the ALSA card at first; this syncs with pending operations */
if (card->snd_card) {
(B) snd_card_free(card->snd_card);
card->snd_card = NULL;
}
/* remove and free each DAI */
(X) soc_remove_link_dais(card);
for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link)
(C) snd_soc_remove_dai_link(card, link);
...
}
At (A), topology calls snd_soc_remove_dai_link().
Then topology rtd, and its related all data are freed.
Next, (B) is called, and then, pcm->private_free = soc_pcm_private_free()
is called.
static void soc_pcm_private_free(struct snd_pcm *pcm)
{
struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd = pcm->private_data;
/* need to sync the delayed work before releasing resources */
flush_delayed_work(&rtd->delayed_work);
snd_soc_pcm_component_free(rtd);
}
Here, it gets rtd via pcm->private_data.
But, topology related rtd are already freed at (A).
Normal sound card has no damage, becase it frees rtd at (C).
These are finalizing rtd related data.
Thus, these should be called when rtd was freed, not sound card
was freed. It is very natural and understandable.
In other words, pcm->private_free = soc_pcm_private_free()
is no longer needed.
Extra issue is that there is zero chance to call
soc_remove_dai() for topology related dai at (X).
Because (A) removes rtd connection from card too, and,
(X) is based on card connected rtd.
This means, (X) need to be called before (C) (= for normal sound)
and (A) (= for topology).
Now, I want to focus this patch which is the reason why
snd_card_free() = (B) is located there.
commit 4efda5f213
("ASoC: Fix use-after-free at card unregistration")
Original snd_card_free() was called last of this function.
But moved to top to avoid use-after-free issue.
The issue was happen at soc_pcm_free() which was pcm->private_free,
today it is updated/renamed to soc_pcm_private_free().
In other words, (B) need to be called before (C) (= for normal sound)
and (A) (= for topology), because it needs (not yet freed) rtd.
But, (A) need to be called before (B),
because it needs card->snd_card pointer.
If we call flush_delayed_work() and snd_soc_pcm_component_free()
(= same as soc_pcm_private_free()) when rtd was freed (= (C), (A)),
there is no reason to call snd_card_free() at top of this function.
It can be called end of this function, again.
But, in such case, it will likely break unbind again, as Takashi-san
reported. When unbind is performed in a busy state, the code may
release still-in-use resources.
At least we need to call snd_card_disconnect_sync() at the first place.
The final code will be...
static void soc_cleanup_card_resources(struct snd_soc_card *card)
{
struct snd_soc_dai_link *link, *_link;
if (card->snd_card)
(Z) snd_card_disconnect_sync(card->snd_card);
(X) soc_remove_link_dais(card);
(A) soc_remove_link_components(card);
for_each_card_links_safe(card, link, _link)
(C) snd_soc_remove_dai_link(card, link);
...
if (card->snd_card) {
(B) snd_card_free(card->snd_card);
card->snd_card = NULL;
}
}
To avoid release still-in-use resources,
call snd_card_disconnect_sync() at (Z).
(X) is needed for both non-topology and topology.
topology removes rtd via (A), and
non topology removes rtd via (C).
snd_card_free() is no longer related to use-after-free issue.
Thus, locating (B) is no problem.
Fixes: df95a16d2a ("ASoC: soc-core: fix RIP warning on card removal")
Fixes: bc7a9091e5 ("ASoC: soc-core: add soc_unbind_dai_link()")
Reported-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8xax88g.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
soc_cleanup_card_resources() will call card->remove(), but it should be
called if card->probe() or card->late_probe() are called.
snd_soc_bind_card() might be error before calling
card->probe() / card->late_probe().
In that time, card->remove() will be called.
This patch adds card_probed parameter to judge it.
Fixes: bfce78a559 ("ASoC: soc-core: tidyup soc_init_dai_link()")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87o8xg4ltr.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming,
like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc.
But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc.
It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to
debug.
snd_soc_bind_card() is calling snd_soc_dapm_init() for both
card and component.
Let's call paired snd_soc_dapm_shutdown() at paired
soc_cleanup_card_resources().
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22c4lub.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
snd_soc_bind_card() is calling many initialize functions
for each card / link / dai / aux etc, etc, etc...
When error happen, the message is indicated at snd_soc_bind_card(),
not at each functions.
But, only soc_probe_aux_devices() case is indicating error at functions,
not at snd_soc_bind_card().
It is not an issue, but unbalanced.
This patch moves error message to snd_soc_bind_card().
Also avoids deep-nested code.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfsthkw9.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
We don't need to separete snd_soc_add_dai_link() and
soc_bind_dai_link() anymore. Let's merge these.
One note is that before this patch, it adds list (A)
eventhough if it had dai_link->ignore (1), or already bounded dai_link (2).
But I guess it is wrong. This patch also solve this issue.
/* BEFORE */
int soc_bind_dai_link(...)
{
...
(1) if (dai_link->ignore)
return 0;
(2) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
return 0;
...
}
int snd_soc_add_dai_link(...)
{
...
=> ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...);
=> if (ret < 0)
=> return ret;
(A) list_add_tail(&dai_link->list, &card->dai_link_list);
...
}
/* AFTER */
int snd_soc_add_dai_link(...)
{
...
(1) if (dai_link->ignore)
return 0;
(2) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...))
return 0;
...
(A) list_add_tail(&dai_link->list, &card->dai_link_list);
return 0;
}
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87r22lhkx8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
