[ Upstream commit d0c5ac04e7feedbc069f26f4dcbf35b521ae7fc5 ]
A recent patch renaming MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET to
MIPI_DSI_MODE_NO_EOT_PACKET brought to light the
misunderstanding in the current MCDE driver and all
its associated panel drivers that MIPI_DSI_MODE_EOT_PACKET
would mean "use EOT packet" when in fact it means the
reverse.
Fix it up by implementing the flag right in the MCDE
DSI driver and remove the flag from panels that actually
want the EOT packet.
Suggested-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Fixes: 5fc537bfd0 ("drm/mcde: Add new driver for ST-Ericsson MCDE")
Fixes: 899f24ed8d ("drm/panel: Add driver for Novatek NT35510-based panels")
Fixes: ac1d6d7488 ("drm/panel: Add driver for Samsung S6D16D0 panel")
Fixes: 435e06c06c ("drm/panel: s6e63m0: Add DSI transport")
Fixes: 8152c2bfd7 ("drm/panel: Add driver for Sony ACX424AKP panel")
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210304004138.1785057-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
The probe routine acquires the reset GPIO using GPIOD_OUT_LOW. Directly
afterwards it calls acx565akm_detect(), which sets the GPIO value to
HIGH. If the bootloader initialized the GPIO to HIGH before the probe
routine was called, there is only a very short time period of a few
instructions where the reset signal is LOW. Exact time depends on
compiler optimizations, kernel configuration and alignment of the stars,
but I expect it to be always way less than 10us. There are no public
datasheets for the panel, but acx565akm_power_on() has a comment with
timings and reset period should be at least 10us. So this potentially
brings the panel into a half-reset state.
The result is, that panel may not work after boot and can get into a
working state by re-enabling it (e.g. by blanking + unblanking), since
that does a clean reset cycle. This bug has recently been hit by Ivaylo
Dimitrov, but there are some older reports which are probably the same
bug. At least Tony Lindgren, Peter Ujfalusi and Jarkko Nikula have
experienced it in 2017 describing the blank/unblank procedure as
possible workaround.
Note, that the bug really goes back in time. It has originally been
introduced in the predecessor of the omapfb driver in commit 3c45d05be3
("OMAPDSS: acx565akm panel: handle gpios in panel driver") in 2012.
That driver eventually got replaced by a newer one, which had the bug
from the beginning in commit 84192742d9 ("OMAPDSS: Add Sony ACX565AKM
panel driver") and still exists in fbdev world. That driver has later
been copied to omapdrm and then was used as a basis for this driver.
Last but not least the omapdrm specific driver has been removed in
commit 45f16c82db ("drm/omap: displays: Remove unused panel drivers").
Reported-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
Reported-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Reported-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reported-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Reported-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Cc: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@wizzup.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Fixes: 1c8fc3f0c5 ("drm/panel: Add driver for the Sony ACX565AKM panel")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201127200429.129868-1-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com
The upstream S6E63M0 driver has some peculiarities around
the prepare/enable disable/unprepare sequence: the screen
is taken out of sleep in prepare() as part of
s6e63m0_init() the put to on with MIPI_DCS_SET_DISPLAY_ON
in enable().
However it is just put into sleep mode directly in
disable(). As disable()/enable() can be called without
unprepare()/prepare() being called, this is unbalanced,
we should take the display out of sleep in enable()
then turn it off().
Further MIPI_DCS_SET_DISPLAY_OFF is never called
balanced with MIPI_DCS_SET_DISPLAY_ON.
The vendor driver for Samsung GT-I8190 (Golden) does all
of these things in strict order.
Augment the driver to do exit sleep/set display on in
enable() and set display off/enter sleep in disable().
Further send an explicit reset pulse in power_on() so we
come up in a known state, and issue the MCS_ERROR_CHECK
command after setting display on like the vendor driver
does. Also use the timings from the vendor driver in
the sequence.
Doing all of these things makes the display much more
stable on the Samsung GT-I8190 when enabling/disabling
the display pipeline.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200817213906.88207-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org
This panel can be accessed using both SPI and DSI.
To make it possible to probe and use the device also from
a DSI bus, first break out the SPI support to its own file.
Since all the panel driver does is write DCS commands to
the panel, we pass a DCS write function to probe()
from each subdriver.
We make the Kconfig entry for SPI mode default so all
current users will continue to work.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Cc: Paweł Chmiel <pawel.mikolaj.chmiel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/384873/
Backmerging drm-next into drm-misc-next for nouveau and panel updates.
Resolves a conflict between ttm and nouveau, where struct ttm_mem_res got
renamed to struct ttm_resource.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Warn if we detect a panel with incomplete/wrong description.
This is inspired by a similar patch by Laurent that introduced checks
for LVDS panels - this extends the checks to the remaining type of
connectors.
This is known to warn for some of the existing panels but added
despite this as we need help from people using the panels to
add the missing info.
The checks are not complete but will catch the most common mistakes.
The checks at the same time serve as documentation for the minimum
required description for a panel.
The checks uses dev_warn() as we know this will hit. WARN() was
too noisy at the moment for anything else than LVDS.
v3:
- %d => %u for bpc (Laurent)
v2:
- Use dev_warn (Laurent)
- Check for empty bus_flags
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200726203324.3722593-2-sam@ravnborg.org
On boe_nv133fhm_n62 (and presumably on boe_nv133fhm_n61) a scope shows
a small spike on the HPD line right when you power the panel on. The
picture looks something like this:
+--------------------------------------
|
|
|
Power ---+
+---
|
++ |
+----+| |
HPD -----+ +---------------------------+
So right when power is applied there's a little bump in HPD and then
there's small spike right before it goes low. The total time of the
little bump plus the spike was measured on one panel as being 8 ms
long. The total time for the HPD to go high on the same panel was
51.2 ms, though the datasheet only promises it is < 200 ms.
When asked about this glitch, BOE indicated that it was expected and
persisted until the TCON has been initialized.
If this was a real hotpluggable DP panel then this wouldn't matter a
whole lot. We'd debounce the HPD signal for a really long time and so
the little blip wouldn't hurt. However, this is not a hotpluggable DP
panel and the the debouncing logic isn't needed and just shows down
the time needed to get the display working. This is why the code in
panel_simple_prepare() doesn't do debouncing and just waits for HPD to
go high once. Unfortunately if we get unlucky and happen to poll the
HPD line right at the spike we can try talking to the panel before
it's ready.
Let's handle this situation by putting in a 15 ms prepare delay and
decreasing the "hpd absent delay" by 15 ms. That means:
* If you don't have HPD hooked up at all you've still got the
hardcoded 200 ms delay.
* If you've got HPD hooked up you will always wait at least 15 ms
before checking HPD. The only case where this could be bad is if
the panel is sharing a voltage rail with something else in the
system and was already turned on long before the panel came up. In
such a case we'll be delaying 15 ms for no reason, but it's not a
huge delay and I don't see any other good solution to handle that
case.
Even though the delay was measured as 8 ms, 15 ms was chosen to give a
bit of margin.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200716132120.1.I01e738cd469b61fc9b28b3ef1c6541a4f48b11bf@changeid
