commit c119565a15a628efdfa51352f9f6c5186e506a1c upstream.
On book3s/32, page protection is defined by the PP bits in the PTE
which provide the following protection depending on the access
keys defined in the matching segment register:
- PP 00 means RW with key 0 and N/A with key 1.
- PP 01 means RW with key 0 and RO with key 1.
- PP 10 means RW with both key 0 and key 1.
- PP 11 means RO with both key 0 and key 1.
Since the implementation of kernel userspace access protection,
PP bits have been set as follows:
- PP00 for pages without _PAGE_USER
- PP01 for pages with _PAGE_USER and _PAGE_RW
- PP11 for pages with _PAGE_USER and without _PAGE_RW
For kernelspace segments, kernel accesses are performed with key 0
and user accesses are performed with key 1. As PP00 is used for
non _PAGE_USER pages, user can't access kernel pages not flagged
_PAGE_USER while kernel can.
For userspace segments, both kernel and user accesses are performed
with key 0, therefore pages not flagged _PAGE_USER are still
accessible to the user.
This shouldn't be an issue, because userspace is expected to be
accessible to the user. But unlike most other architectures, powerpc
implements PROT_NONE protection by removing _PAGE_USER flag instead of
flagging the page as not valid. This means that pages in userspace
that are not flagged _PAGE_USER shall remain inaccessible.
To get the expected behaviour, just mimic other architectures in the
TLB miss handler by checking _PAGE_USER permission on userspace
accesses as if it was the _PAGE_PRESENT bit.
Note that this problem only is only for 603 cores. The 604+ have
an hash table, and hash_page() function already implement the
verification of _PAGE_USER permission on userspace pages.
Fixes: f342adca3a ("powerpc/32s: Prepare Kernel Userspace Access Protection")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2+
Reported-by: Christoph Plattner <christoph.plattner@thalesgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4a0c6e3bb8f0c162457bf54d9bc6fd8d7b55129f.1612160907.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 3642eb21256a317ac14e9ed560242c6d20cf06d9 upstream.
THREAD_ALIGN_SHIFT = THREAD_SHIFT + 1 = PAGE_SHIFT + 1
Maximum PAGE_SHIFT is 18 for 256k pages so
THREAD_ALIGN_SHIFT is 19 at the maximum.
No need to clobber cr1, it can be preserved when moving r1
into CR when we check stack overflow.
This reduces the number of instructions in Machine Check Exception
prolog and fixes a build failure reported by the kernel test robot
on v5.10 stable when building with RTAS + VMAP_STACK + KVM. That
build failure is due to too many instructions in the prolog hence
not fitting between 0x200 and 0x300. Allthough the problem doesn't
show up in mainline, it is still worth the change.
Fixes: 98bf2d3f4970 ("powerpc/32s: Fix RTAS machine check with VMAP stack")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5ae4d545e3ac58e133d2599e0deb88843cb494fc.1612768623.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Unlike PPC64 which had a single head_64.S, PPC32 are multiple ones.
There is the head_32.S, selected by default based on the value of BITS
and overridden based on some CONFIG_ values. This leads to thinking
that it may be selected by different types of PPC32 platform but
indeed it ends up being selected by book3s/32 only.
Make that explicit by:
- Not doing any default selection based on BITS.
- Renaming head_32.S to head_book3s_32.S.
- Get head_book3s_32.S selected only by CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_32.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
[mpe: Fix head_$(BITS).o reference in arch/powerpc/Makefile]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/319d379f696412681c66a987cc75e6abf8f958d2.1601975100.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
