Userspace cannot compile <asm/sembuf.h> due to some missing type
definitions. For example, building it for x86 fails as follows:
CC usr/include/asm/sembuf.h.s
In file included from <command-line>:32:0:
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:17:20: error: field `sem_perm' has incomplete type
struct ipc64_perm sem_perm; /* permissions .. see ipc.h */
^~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:24:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_time_t'
__kernel_time_t sem_otime; /* last semop time */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:25:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_ulong_t'
__kernel_ulong_t __unused1;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:26:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_time_t'
__kernel_time_t sem_ctime; /* last change time */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:27:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_ulong_t'
__kernel_ulong_t __unused2;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:29:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_ulong_t'
__kernel_ulong_t sem_nsems; /* no. of semaphores in array */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:30:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_ulong_t'
__kernel_ulong_t __unused3;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm/sembuf.h:31:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_ulong_t'
__kernel_ulong_t __unused4;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is just a matter of missing include directive.
Include <asm/ipcbuf.h> to make it self-contained, and add it to
the compile-test coverage.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030063855.9989-3-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Userspace cannot compile <asm/msgbuf.h> due to some missing type
definitions. For example, building it for x86 fails as follows:
CC usr/include/asm/msgbuf.h.s
In file included from usr/include/asm/msgbuf.h:6:0,
from <command-line>:32:
usr/include/asm-generic/msgbuf.h:25:20: error: field `msg_perm' has incomplete type
struct ipc64_perm msg_perm;
^~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/msgbuf.h:27:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_time_t'
__kernel_time_t msg_stime; /* last msgsnd time */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/msgbuf.h:28:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_time_t'
__kernel_time_t msg_rtime; /* last msgrcv time */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/msgbuf.h:29:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_time_t'
__kernel_time_t msg_ctime; /* last change time */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/msgbuf.h:41:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_pid_t'
__kernel_pid_t msg_lspid; /* pid of last msgsnd */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/msgbuf.h:42:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_pid_t'
__kernel_pid_t msg_lrpid; /* last receive pid */
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is just a matter of missing include directive.
Include <asm/ipcbuf.h> to make it self-contained, and add it to
the compile-test coverage.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030063855.9989-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Userspace cannot compile <asm/ipcbuf.h> due to some missing type
definitions. For example, building it for x86 fails as follows:
CC usr/include/asm/ipcbuf.h.s
In file included from usr/include/asm/ipcbuf.h:1:0,
from <command-line>:32:
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:21:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_key_t'
__kernel_key_t key;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:22:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_uid32_t'
__kernel_uid32_t uid;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:23:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_gid32_t'
__kernel_gid32_t gid;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:24:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_uid32_t'
__kernel_uid32_t cuid;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:25:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_gid32_t'
__kernel_gid32_t cgid;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:26:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_mode_t'
__kernel_mode_t mode;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:28:35: error: `__kernel_mode_t' undeclared here (not in a function)
unsigned char __pad1[4 - sizeof(__kernel_mode_t)];
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:31:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_ulong_t'
__kernel_ulong_t __unused1;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
usr/include/asm-generic/ipcbuf.h:32:2: error: unknown type name `__kernel_ulong_t'
__kernel_ulong_t __unused2;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is just a matter of missing include directive.
Include <linux/posix_types.h> to make it self-contained, and add it to
the compile-test coverage.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030063855.9989-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
At the moment, UBSAN report will be serialized using a spin_lock(). On
RT-systems, spinlocks are turned to rt_spin_lock and may sleep. This
will result to the following splat if the undefined behavior is in a
context that can sleep:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at /src/linux/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:968
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 3447, name: make
1 lock held by make/3447:
#0: 000000009a966332 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: do_page_fault+0x140/0x4f8
irq event stamp: 6284
hardirqs last enabled at (6283): [<ffff000011326520>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x90/0xa0
hardirqs last disabled at (6284): [<ffff0000113262b0>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x30/0x78
softirqs last enabled at (2430): [<ffff000010088ef8>] fpsimd_restore_current_state+0x60/0xe8
softirqs last disabled at (2427): [<ffff000010088ec0>] fpsimd_restore_current_state+0x28/0xe8
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffff000011324a4c>] rt_mutex_futex_unlock+0x4c/0xb0
CPU: 3 PID: 3447 Comm: make Tainted: G W 5.2.14-rt7-01890-ge6e057589653 #911
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x148
show_stack+0x14/0x20
dump_stack+0xbc/0x104
___might_sleep+0x154/0x210
rt_spin_lock+0x68/0xa0
ubsan_prologue+0x30/0x68
handle_overflow+0x64/0xe0
__ubsan_handle_add_overflow+0x10/0x18
__lock_acquire+0x1c28/0x2a28
lock_acquire+0xf0/0x370
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x58/0x78
rt_mutex_futex_unlock+0x4c/0xb0
rt_spin_unlock+0x28/0x70
get_page_from_freelist+0x428/0x2b60
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x174/0x1708
alloc_pages_vma+0x1ac/0x238
__handle_mm_fault+0x4ac/0x10b0
handle_mm_fault+0x1d8/0x3b0
do_page_fault+0x1c8/0x4f8
do_translation_fault+0xb8/0xe0
do_mem_abort+0x3c/0x98
el0_da+0x20/0x24
The spin_lock() will protect against multiple CPUs to output a report
together, I guess to prevent them from being interleaved. However, they
can still interleave with other messages (and even splat from
__might_sleep).
So the lock usefulness seems pretty limited. Rather than trying to
accomodate RT-system by switching to a raw_spin_lock(), the lock is now
completely dropped.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190920100835.14999-1-julien.grall@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
Reported-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series " kcov: collect coverage from usb and vhost", v3.
This patchset extends kcov to allow collecting coverage from backgound
kernel threads. This extension requires custom annotations for each of
the places where coverage collection is desired. This patchset
implements this for hub events in the USB subsystem and for vhost
workers. See the first patch description for details about the kcov
extension. The other two patches apply this kcov extension to USB and
vhost.
Examples of other subsystems that might potentially benefit from this
when custom annotations are added (the list is based on
process_one_work() callers for bugs recently reported by syzbot):
1. fs: writeback wb_workfn() worker,
2. net: addrconf_dad_work()/addrconf_verify_work() workers,
3. net: neigh_periodic_work() worker,
4. net/p9: p9_write_work()/p9_read_work() workers,
5. block: blk_mq_run_work_fn() worker.
These patches have been used to enable coverage-guided USB fuzzing with
syzkaller for the last few years, see the details here:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/linux/external_fuzzing_usb.md
This patchset has been pushed to the public Linux kernel Gerrit
instance:
https://linux-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux/+/1524
This patch (of 3):
Add background thread coverage collection ability to kcov.
With KCOV_ENABLE coverage is collected only for syscalls that are issued
from the current process. With KCOV_REMOTE_ENABLE it's possible to
collect coverage for arbitrary parts of the kernel code, provided that
those parts are annotated with kcov_remote_start()/kcov_remote_stop().
This allows to collect coverage from two types of kernel background
threads: the global ones, that are spawned during kernel boot in a
limited number of instances (e.g. one USB hub_event() worker thread is
spawned per USB HCD); and the local ones, that are spawned when a user
interacts with some kernel interface (e.g. vhost workers).
To enable collecting coverage from a global background thread, a unique
global handle must be assigned and passed to the corresponding
kcov_remote_start() call. Then a userspace process can pass a list of
such handles to the KCOV_REMOTE_ENABLE ioctl in the handles array field
of the kcov_remote_arg struct. This will attach the used kcov device to
the code sections, that are referenced by those handles.
Since there might be many local background threads spawned from
different userspace processes, we can't use a single global handle per
annotation. Instead, the userspace process passes a non-zero handle
through the common_handle field of the kcov_remote_arg struct. This
common handle gets saved to the kcov_handle field in the current
task_struct and needs to be passed to the newly spawned threads via
custom annotations. Those threads should in turn be annotated with
kcov_remote_start()/kcov_remote_stop().
Internally kcov stores handles as u64 integers. The top byte of a
handle is used to denote the id of a subsystem that this handle belongs
to, and the lower 4 bytes are used to denote the id of a thread instance
within that subsystem. A reserved value 0 is used as a subsystem id for
common handles as they don't belong to a particular subsystem. The
bytes 4-7 are currently reserved and must be zero. In the future the
number of bytes used for the subsystem or handle ids might be increased.
When a particular userspace process collects coverage by via a common
handle, kcov will collect coverage for each code section that is
annotated to use the common handle obtained as kcov_handle from the
current task_struct. However non common handles allow to collect
coverage selectively from different subsystems.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e90e315426a384207edbec1d6aa89e43008e4caf.1572366574.git.andreyknvl@google.com
Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: David Windsor <dwindsor@gmail.com>
Cc: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>
Cc: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Include <linux/rio_drv.h> for the missing declarations of functions
exported from this file. Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:59:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_read_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:60:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_read_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:61:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_read_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:62:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_write_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:63:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_write_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:64:1: warning: symbol '__rio_local_write_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:112:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_read_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:113:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_read_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:114:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_read_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:115:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_write_config_8' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:116:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_write_config_16' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:117:1: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_write_config_32' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-access.c:136:5: warning: symbol 'rio_mport_send_doorbell' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191017115103.684-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Include <linux/rio_drv.h> for the missing declarations of functions
exported from this file. Fixes the following sparse warnings:
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:53:16: warning: symbol 'rio_dev_get' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:70:6: warning: symbol 'rio_dev_put' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:150:5: warning: symbol 'rio_register_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/rapidio/rio-driver.c:169:6: warning: symbol 'rio_unregister_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191017114923.10888-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Alexandre Bounine <alex.bou9@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The is_maintained_obsolete function can be called twice using the same
filename. This function spawns a process using get_maintainer.pl.
Store the status of each filename when spawned and use the stored result
to eliminate the spawning of unnecessary duplicate child processes.
Example:
old:
$ time ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hp100-Move-to-staging.patch > /dev/null
real 0m1.767s
user 0m1.634s
sys 0m0.141s
new:
$ time ./scripts/checkpatch.pl hp100-Move-to-staging.patch > /dev/null
real 0m1.184s
user 0m1.085s
sys 0m0.103s
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/b982566a2b9b4825badce36fdfc3032bd0005151.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In some cases the previous algorithm would not return the closest
approximation. This would happen when a semi-convergent was the
closest, as the previous algorithm would only consider convergents.
As an example, consider an initial value of 5/4, and trying to find the
closest approximation with a maximum of 4 for numerator and denominator.
The previous algorithm would return 1/1 as the closest approximation,
while this version will return the correct answer of 4/3.
To do this, the main loop performs effectively the same operations as it
did before. It must now keep track of the last three approximations,
n2/d2 .. n0/d0, while before it only needed the last two.
If an exact answer is not found, the algorithm will now calculate the
best semi-convergent term, t, which is a single expression with two
divisions:
min((max_numerator - n0) / n1, (max_denominator - d0) / d1)
This will be used if it is better than previous convergent. The test
for this is generally a simple comparison, 2*t > a. But in an edge
case, where the convergent's final term is even and the best allowable
semi-convergent has a final term of exactly half the convergent's final
term, the more complex comparison (d0*dp > d1*d) is used.
I also wrote some comments explaining the code. While one still needs
to look up the math elsewhere, they should help a lot to follow how the
code relates to that math.
This routine is used in two places in the video4linux code, but in those
cases it is only used to reduce a fraction to lowest terms, which the
existing code will do correctly. This could be done more efficiently
with a different library routine but it would still be the Euclidean
alogrithm at its heart. So no change.
The remain users are places where a fractional PLL divider is
programmed. What would happen is something asked for a clock of X MHz
but instead gets Y MHz, where Y is close to X but not exactly due to the
hardware limitations. After this change they might, in some cases, get
Y' MHz, where Y' is a little closer to X then Y was.
Users like this are: Three UARTs, in 8250_mid, 8250_lpss, and imx. One
GPU in vp4_hdmi. And three clock drivers, clk-cdce706, clk-si5351, and
clk-fractional-divider. The last is a generic clock driver and so would
have more users referenced via device tree entries.
I think there's a bug in that one, it's limiting an N bit field that is
offset-by-1 to the range 0 .. (1<<N)-2, when it should be (1<<N)-1 as
the upper limit.
I have an IMX system, one of the UARTs using this, so I can provide a
real example. If I request a custom baud rate of 1499978, the driver
will program the PLL to produce a baud rate of 1500000. After this
change, the fractional divider in the UART is programmed to a ratio of
65535/65536, which produces a baud rate of 1499977.0625. Closer to the
requested value.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190330205855.19396-1-tpiepho@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@gmail.com>
Cc: Oskar Schirmer <oskar@scara.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
