This change is for general scheduler improvement.
Change-Id: I7c3a073fa68d715dd3bdbed11e4f83e82046a3c0
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
This reverts commit 1e6b1214f107503 ("FROMLIST: sched/topology:
Make Energy Aware Scheduling depend on schedutil").
Right now, EAS gets disabled when governor set to anything other
than schedutil which affects scheduling decisions. To make sure
we always get better scheduling decions, EAS needs to be supported
irrespective of the governor.
Change-Id: I788faaacd477b3ff93ea9787c18a1235c8c3eb0b
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
[shalagra@codeaurora.org: Fixed merge conflicts in port to 5.x]
Signed-off-by: Shaleen Agrawal <shalagra@codeaurora.org>
This snapshot is taken from msm-4.19 as of commit 2508aa54fb9e
(sched: Improve the scheduler").
Change-Id: I193900db684515f6585371b7c58d5b9c361c2e6b
Signed-off-by: Shaleen Agrawal <shalagra@codeaurora.org>
This change is for general scheduler improvement.
Change-Id: I9216f9316e2bad067c10762de8d67912826b7bc7
Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <aiquny@codeaurora.org>
Co-developed-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
[pkondeti@codeaurora.org: skip_cpu argument is implemented for fbt]
Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
[satyap@codeaurora.org: port to 5.4 and fix trivial merge conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This patch adds a parameter to select_task_rq, sibling_count_hint
allowing the caller, where it has this information, to inform the
sched_class the number of tasks that are being woken up as part of
the same event.
The wake_q mechanism is one case where this information is available.
select_task_rq_fair can then use the information to detect that it
needs to widen the search space for task placement in order to avoid
overloading the last-level cache domain's CPUs.
* * *
The reason I am investigating this change is the following use case
on ARM big.LITTLE (asymmetrical CPU capacity): 1 task per CPU, which
all repeatedly do X amount of work then
pthread_barrier_wait (i.e. sleep until the last task finishes its X
and hits the barrier). On big.LITTLE, the tasks which get a "big" CPU
finish faster, and then those CPUs pull over the tasks that are still
running:
v CPU v ->time->
-------------
0 (big) 11111 /333
-------------
1 (big) 22222 /444|
-------------
2 (LITTLE) 333333/
-------------
3 (LITTLE) 444444/
-------------
Now when task 4 hits the barrier (at |) and wakes the others up,
there are 4 tasks with prev_cpu=<big> and 0 tasks with
prev_cpu=<little>. want_affine therefore means that we'll only look
in CPUs 0 and 1 (sd_llc), so tasks will be unnecessarily coscheduled
on the bigs until the next load balance, something like this:
v CPU v ->time->
------------------------
0 (big) 11111 /333 31313\33333
------------------------
1 (big) 22222 /444|424\4444444
------------------------
2 (LITTLE) 333333/ \222222
------------------------
3 (LITTLE) 444444/ \1111
------------------------
^^^
underutilization
So, I'm trying to get want_affine = 0 for these tasks.
I don't _think_ any incarnation of the wakee_flips mechanism can help
us here because which task is waker and which tasks are wakees
generally changes with each iteration.
However pthread_barrier_wait (or more accurately FUTEX_WAKE) has the
nice property that we know exactly how many tasks are being woken, so
we can cheat.
It might be a disadvantage that we "widen" _every_ task that's woken in
an event, while select_idle_sibling would work fine for the first
sd_llc_size - 1 tasks.
IIUC, if wake_affine() behaves correctly this trick wouldn't be
necessary on SMP systems, so it might be best guarded by the presence
of SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY?
* * *
Final note..
In order to observe "perfect" behaviour for this use case, I also had
to disable the TTWU_QUEUE sched feature. Suppose during the wakeup
above we are working through the work queue and have placed tasks 3
and 2, and are about to place task 1:
v CPU v ->time->
--------------
0 (big) 11111 /333 3
--------------
1 (big) 22222 /444|4
--------------
2 (LITTLE) 333333/ 2
--------------
3 (LITTLE) 444444/ <- Task 1 should go here
--------------
If TTWU_QUEUE is enabled, we will not yet have enqueued task
2 (having instead sent a reschedule IPI) or attached its load to CPU
2. So we are likely to also place task 1 on cpu 2. Disabling
TTWU_QUEUE means that we enqueue task 2 before placing task 1,
solving this issue. TTWU_QUEUE is there to minimise rq lock
contention, and I guess that this contention is less of an issue on
big.LITTLE systems since they have relatively few CPUs, which
suggests the trade-off makes sense here.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
( - Applied from https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9895261/
- Fixed trivial conflict in kernel/sched/core.c
- Fixed select_task_rq_idle, now in kernel/sched/idle.c
- Fixed trivial conflict in select_task_rq_fair )
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Change-Id: I3cfc4bf48c3d7feef969db4d22449f4fbb4f795d
[satyap@codeaurora.org: port to 5.4 and fix trivial merge conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
The current implementation of overutilization, aborts energy aware
scheduling if any cpu in the system is over-utilized. This patch introduces
over utilization flag per sched domain level instead of a single flag
system wide. Load balancing is done at the sched domain where any
of the cpu is over utilized. If energy aware scheduling is
enabled and no cpu in a sched domain is overuttilized,
load balancing is skipped for that sched domain and energy aware
scheduling continues at that level.
The implementation takes advantage of the shared sched_domain structure
that is common across all the sched domains at a level. The new flag
introduced is placed in this structure so that all the sched domains the
same level share the flag. In case of an overutilized cpu, the flag gets
set at level1 sched_domain. The flag at the parent sched_domain level gets
set in either of the two following scenarios.
1. There is a misfit task in one of the cpu's in this sched_domain.
2. The total utilization of the domain is greater than the domain capacity
The flag is cleared if no cpu in a sched domain is overutilized.
This implementation still can have corner scenarios with respect to
misfit tasks. For example consider a sched group with n cpus and
n+1 70%utilized tasks. Ideally this is a case for load balance to happen
in a parent sched domain. But neither the total group utilization is
high enough for the load balance to be triggered in the parent domain nor
there is a cpu with a single overutilized task so that aload balance is
triggered in a parent domain. But again this could be a purely academic
sceanrio, as during task wake up these tasks will be placed
more appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
Change-Id: I3f327cff4080096a3e58208dd72c9b7f7913cdb2
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
Git-commit: addef37808728c719d8c095a75bcf81befdacdaf
Git-repo: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/
[clingutla@codeaurora.org: Resolved trivial merge conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>
[satyap@codeaurora.org: port to 5.x and resolve trivial merge conflicts]
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This snapshot is taken from msm-4.19 as of commit 5debecbe7195
("trace: filter out spurious preemption and IRQs disable traces").
Change-Id: I3c9663da1fd89e9e942831fda00a47b4a29ea4e3
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This snapshot is taken from msm-4.19 as of commit 89986132507b822
("sched: fair: Improve the scheduler").
Change-Id: I75555a04020478e8d589b6a0fba209501c360dad
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This snapshot is taken from msm-4.19 as of commit 22d004c08a27
("sched/fair: Improve the scheduler").
Change-Id: I8fc95a4a4650de0dc36bd979d374b9335f6af774
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This snapshot is taken from msm-4.19 as of commit 89986132507b822
("sched: fair: Improve the scheduler").
Change-Id: I9a52e67862ee5086880884128102aa4f8efb04ce
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This snapshot is taken from msm-4.19 as of commit 5debecbe7195
("trace: filter out spurious preemption and IRQs disable traces").
Change-Id: I222aa448ac68f7365065f62dba9db94925da38a0
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This snapshot is taken from msm-4.19 as of commit 5debecbe7195
("trace: filter out spurious preemption and IRQs disable traces").
Change-Id: I8fab4084971baadcaa037f40ab549fc073a4b1ea
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
The idle-state of each cpu is currently pointed to by rq->idle_state but
there isn't any information in the struct cpuidle_state that can used to
look up the idle-state energy model data stored in struct
sched_group_energy. For this purpose is necessary to store the idle
state index as well. Ideally, the idle-state data should be unified.
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Change-Id: Ib3d1178512735b0e314881f73fb8ccff5a69319f
Signed-off-by: Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@arm.com>
(cherry picked from commit a732c97420e109956c20f34c70b91e6d06f5df31)
[ Fixed trivial cherry-pick conflict in kernel/sched/sched.h ]
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
[satyap@codeaurora.org: port to msm-5.x from msm-4.19 and add
WALT check around idle_state_idx usage]
Signed-off-by: Satya Durga Srinivasu Prabhala <satyap@codeaurora.org>
This reverts commit 9acb7c07b6.
The root problem has now been fixed in 5.4-rc7, so revert this to
prevent merge issues.
Bug: 142182814
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@google.com>
Commit 67692435c4 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path")
inadvertly introduced a race because it changed a previously
unexplored dependency between dropping the rq->lock and
sched_class::put_prev_task().
The comments about dropping rq->lock, in for example
newidle_balance(), only mentions the task being current and ->on_cpu
being set. But when we look at the 'change' pattern (in for example
sched_setnuma()):
queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); /* p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED */
running = task_current(rq, p); /* rq->curr == p */
if (queued)
dequeue_task(...);
if (running)
put_prev_task(...);
/* change task properties */
if (queued)
enqueue_task(...);
if (running)
set_next_task(...);
It becomes obvious that if we do this after put_prev_task() has
already been called on @p, things go sideways. This is exactly what
the commit in question allows to happen when it does:
prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf);
if (!rq->nr_running)
newidle_balance(rq, rf);
The newidle_balance() call will drop rq->lock after we've called
put_prev_task() and that allows the above 'change' pattern to
interleave and mess up the state.
Furthermore, it turns out we lost the RT-pull when we put the last DL
task.
Fix both problems by extracting the balancing from put_prev_task() and
doing a multi-class balance() pass before put_prev_task().
Fixes: 67692435c4 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path")
Reported-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Introduce a simple helper to read the latency_sensitive flag from a
task. It is called uclamp_latency_sensitive() to match the API
proposed by Patrick.
While at it, introduce uclamp_boosted() which returns true only when a
task has a non-null min-clamp.
Change-Id: I5fc747da8b58625257a6604a3c88487b657fbe7a
Suggested-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Add a 'latency_sensitive' flag to uclamp in order to express the need
for some tasks to find a CPU where they can wake-up quickly. This is not
expected to be used without cgroup support, so add solely a cgroup
interface for it.
As this flag represents a boolean attribute and not an amount of
resources to be shared, it is not clear what the delegation logic should
be. As such, it is kept simple: every new cgroup starts with
latency_sensitive set to false, regardless of the parent.
In essence, this is similar to SchedTune's prefer-idle flag which was
used in android-4.19 and prior.
Change-Id: I722d8ecabb428bb7b95a5b54bc70a87f182dde2a
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Wakeup balancing uses cpu capacity awareness and needs to know the
system-wide maximum cpu capacity.
Patch "sched: Store system-wide maximum cpu capacity in root domain"
finds the system-wide maximum cpu capacity during scheduler domain
hierarchy setup. This is sufficient as long as maximum frequency
invariance is not enabled.
If it is enabled, the system-wide maximum cpu capacity can change
between scheduler domain hierarchy setups due to frequency capping.
The cpu capacity is changed in update_cpu_capacity() which is called in
load balance on the lowest scheduler domain hierarchy level. To be able
to know if a change in cpu capacity for a certain cpu also has an effect
on the system-wide maximum cpu capacity it is normally necessary to
iterate over all cpus. This would be way too costly. That's why this
patch follows a different approach.
The unsigned long max_cpu_capacity value in struct root_domain is
replaced with a struct max_cpu_capacity, containing value (the
max_cpu_capacity) and cpu (the cpu index of the cpu providing the
maximum cpu_capacity).
Changes to the system-wide maximum cpu capacity and the cpu index are
made if:
1 System-wide maximum cpu capacity < cpu capacity
2 System-wide maximum cpu capacity > cpu capacity and cpu index == cpu
There are no changes to the system-wide maximum cpu capacity in all
other cases.
Atomic read and write access to the pair (max_cpu_capacity.val,
max_cpu_capacity.cpu) is enforced by max_cpu_capacity.lock.
The access to max_cpu_capacity.val in task_fits_max() is still performed
without taking the max_cpu_capacity.lock.
The code to set max cpu capacity in build_sched_domains() has been
removed because the whole functionality is now provided by
update_cpu_capacity() instead.
This approach can introduce errors temporarily, e.g. in case the cpu
currently providing the max cpu capacity has its cpu capacity lowered
due to frequency capping and calls update_cpu_capacity() before any cpu
which might provide the max cpu now.
Change-Id: I5063befab088fbf49e5d5e484ce0c6ee6165283a
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>*
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
(- Fixed cherry-pick issues, and conflict with a0fe2cf086 "sched/fair:
Tune down misfit NOHZ kicks" which makes use of max_cpu_capacity
- Squashed "sched/fair: remove printk while schedule is in progress"
fix from Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
To be able to scale the cpu capacity by this factor introduce a call to
the new arch scaling function arch_scale_max_freq_capacity() in
update_cpu_capacity() and provide a default implementation which returns
SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE.
Another subsystem (e.g. cpufreq) or architectural or platform specific
code can overwrite this default implementation, exactly as for frequency
and cpu invariance. It has to be enabled by the arch by defining
arch_scale_max_freq_capacity to the actual implementation.
Change-Id: I770a8b1f4f7340e9e314f71c64a765bf880f4b4d
Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
( Fixed conflict with scaling against the PELT-based scale_rt_capacity )
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
The membarrier_state field is located within the mm_struct, which
is not guaranteed to exist when used from runqueue-lock-free iteration
on runqueues by the membarrier system call.
Copy the membarrier_state from the mm_struct into the scheduler runqueue
when the scheduler switches between mm.
When registering membarrier for mm, after setting the registration bit
in the mm membarrier state, issue a synchronize_rcu() to ensure the
scheduler observes the change. In order to take care of the case
where a runqueue keeps executing the target mm without swapping to
other mm, iterate over each runqueue and issue an IPI to copy the
membarrier_state from the mm_struct into each runqueue which have the
same mm which state has just been modified.
Move the mm membarrier_state field closer to pgd in mm_struct to use
a cache line already touched by the scheduler switch_mm.
The membarrier_execve() (now membarrier_exec_mmap) hook now needs to
clear the runqueue's membarrier state in addition to clear the mm
membarrier state, so move its implementation into the scheduler
membarrier code so it can access the runqueue structure.
Add memory barrier in membarrier_exec_mmap() prior to clearing
the membarrier state, ensuring memory accesses executed prior to exec
are not reordered with the stores clearing the membarrier state.
As suggested by Linus, move all membarrier.c RCU read-side locks outside
of the for each cpu loops.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190919173705.2181-5-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
In order to properly support hierarchical resources control, the cgroup
delegation model requires that attribute writes from a child group never
fail but still are locally consistent and constrained based on parent's
assigned resources. This requires to properly propagate and aggregate
parent attributes down to its descendants.
Implement this mechanism by adding a new "effective" clamp value for each
task group. The effective clamp value is defined as the smaller value
between the clamp value of a group and the effective clamp value of its
parent. This is the actual clamp value enforced on tasks in a task group.
Since it's possible for a cpu.uclamp.min value to be bigger than the
cpu.uclamp.max value, ensure local consistency by restricting each
"protection" (i.e. min utilization) with the corresponding "limit"
(i.e. max utilization).
Do that at effective clamps propagation to ensure all user-space write
never fails while still always tracking the most restrictive values.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190822132811.31294-3-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The cgroup CPU bandwidth controller allows to assign a specified
(maximum) bandwidth to the tasks of a group. However this bandwidth is
defined and enforced only on a temporal base, without considering the
actual frequency a CPU is running on. Thus, the amount of computation
completed by a task within an allocated bandwidth can be very different
depending on the actual frequency the CPU is running that task.
The amount of computation can be affected also by the specific CPU a
task is running on, especially when running on asymmetric capacity
systems like Arm's big.LITTLE.
With the availability of schedutil, the scheduler is now able
to drive frequency selections based on actual task utilization.
Moreover, the utilization clamping support provides a mechanism to
bias the frequency selection operated by schedutil depending on
constraints assigned to the tasks currently RUNNABLE on a CPU.
Giving the mechanisms described above, it is now possible to extend the
cpu controller to specify the minimum (or maximum) utilization which
should be considered for tasks RUNNABLE on a cpu.
This makes it possible to better defined the actual computational
power assigned to task groups, thus improving the cgroup CPU bandwidth
controller which is currently based just on time constraints.
Extend the CPU controller with a couple of new attributes uclamp.{min,max}
which allow to enforce utilization boosting and capping for all the
tasks in a group.
Specifically:
- uclamp.min: defines the minimum utilization which should be considered
i.e. the RUNNABLE tasks of this group will run at least at a
minimum frequency which corresponds to the uclamp.min
utilization
- uclamp.max: defines the maximum utilization which should be considered
i.e. the RUNNABLE tasks of this group will run up to a
maximum frequency which corresponds to the uclamp.max
utilization
These attributes:
a) are available only for non-root nodes, both on default and legacy
hierarchies, while system wide clamps are defined by a generic
interface which does not depends on cgroups. This system wide
interface enforces constraints on tasks in the root node.
b) enforce effective constraints at each level of the hierarchy which
are a restriction of the group requests considering its parent's
effective constraints. Root group effective constraints are defined
by the system wide interface.
This mechanism allows each (non-root) level of the hierarchy to:
- request whatever clamp values it would like to get
- effectively get only up to the maximum amount allowed by its parent
c) have higher priority than task-specific clamps, defined via
sched_setattr(), thus allowing to control and restrict task requests.
Add two new attributes to the cpu controller to collect "requested"
clamp values. Allow that at each non-root level of the hierarchy.
Keep it simple by not caring now about "effective" values computation
and propagation along the hierarchy.
Update sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler() to use the newly introduced
uclamp_mutex so that we serialize system default updates with cgroup
relate updates.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190822132811.31294-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
It has been observed, that highly-threaded, non-cpu-bound applications
running under cpu.cfs_quota_us constraints can hit a high percentage of
periods throttled while simultaneously not consuming the allocated
amount of quota. This use case is typical of user-interactive non-cpu
bound applications, such as those running in kubernetes or mesos when
run on multiple cpu cores.
This has been root caused to cpu-local run queue being allocated per cpu
bandwidth slices, and then not fully using that slice within the period.
At which point the slice and quota expires. This expiration of unused
slice results in applications not being able to utilize the quota for
which they are allocated.
The non-expiration of per-cpu slices was recently fixed by
'commit 512ac999d2 ("sched/fair: Fix bandwidth timer clock drift
condition")'. Prior to that it appears that this had been broken since
at least 'commit 51f2176d74 ("sched/fair: Fix unlocked reads of some
cfs_b->quota/period")' which was introduced in v3.16-rc1 in 2014. That
added the following conditional which resulted in slices never being
expired.
if (cfs_rq->runtime_expires != cfs_b->runtime_expires) {
/* extend local deadline, drift is bounded above by 2 ticks */
cfs_rq->runtime_expires += TICK_NSEC;
Because this was broken for nearly 5 years, and has recently been fixed
and is now being noticed by many users running kubernetes
(https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/67577) it is my opinion
that the mechanisms around expiring runtime should be removed
altogether.
This allows quota already allocated to per-cpu run-queues to live longer
than the period boundary. This allows threads on runqueues that do not
use much CPU to continue to use their remaining slice over a longer
period of time than cpu.cfs_period_us. However, this helps prevent the
above condition of hitting throttling while also not fully utilizing
your cpu quota.
This theoretically allows a machine to use slightly more than its
allotted quota in some periods. This overflow would be bounded by the
remaining quota left on each per-cpu runqueueu. This is typically no
more than min_cfs_rq_runtime=1ms per cpu. For CPU bound tasks this will
change nothing, as they should theoretically fully utilize all of their
quota in each period. For user-interactive tasks as described above this
provides a much better user/application experience as their cpu
utilization will more closely match the amount they requested when they
hit throttling. This means that cpu limits no longer strictly apply per
period for non-cpu bound applications, but that they are still accurate
over longer timeframes.
This greatly improves performance of high-thread-count, non-cpu bound
applications with low cfs_quota_us allocation on high-core-count
machines. In the case of an artificial testcase (10ms/100ms of quota on
80 CPU machine), this commit resulted in almost 30x performance
improvement, while still maintaining correct cpu quota restrictions.
That testcase is available at https://github.com/indeedeng/fibtest.
Fixes: 512ac999d2 ("sched/fair: Fix bandwidth timer clock drift condition")
Signed-off-by: Dave Chiluk <chiluk+linux@indeed.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: John Hammond <jhammond@indeed.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Kyle Anderson <kwa@yelp.com>
Cc: Gabriel Munos <gmunoz@netflix.com>
Cc: Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>
Cc: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: Brendan Gregg <bgregg@netflix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1563900266-19734-2-git-send-email-chiluk+linux@indeed.com
The Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) estimates the energy impact of waking
up a task on a given CPU. This estimation is based on:
a) an (active) power consumption defined for each CPU frequency
b) an estimation of which frequency will be used on each CPU
c) an estimation of the busy time (utilization) of each CPU
Utilization clamping can affect both b) and c).
A CPU is expected to run:
- on an higher than required frequency, but for a shorter time, in case
its estimated utilization will be smaller than the minimum utilization
enforced by uclamp
- on a smaller than required frequency, but for a longer time, in case
its estimated utilization is bigger than the maximum utilization
enforced by uclamp
While compute_energy() already accounts clamping effects on busy time,
the clamping effects on frequency selection are currently ignored.
Fix it by considering how CPU clamp values will be affected by a
task waking up and being RUNNABLE on that CPU.
Do that by refactoring schedutil_freq_util() to take an additional
task_struct* which allows EAS to evaluate the impact on clamp values of
a task being eventually queued in a CPU. Clamp values are applied to the
RT+CFS utilization only when a FREQUENCY_UTIL is required by
compute_energy().
Do note that switching from ENERGY_UTIL to FREQUENCY_UTIL in the
computation of the cpu_util signal implies that we are more likely to
estimate the highest OPP when a RT task is running in another CPU of
the same performance domain. This can have an impact on energy
estimation but:
- it's not easy to say which approach is better, since it depends on
the use case
- the original approach could still be obtained by setting a smaller
task-specific util_min whenever required
Since we are at that:
- rename schedutil_freq_util() into schedutil_cpu_util(),
since it's not only used for frequency selection.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-12-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Each time a frequency update is required via schedutil, a frequency is
selected to (possibly) satisfy the utilization reported by each
scheduling class and irqs. However, when utilization clamping is in use,
the frequency selection should consider userspace utilization clamping
hints. This will allow, for example, to:
- boost tasks which are directly affecting the user experience
by running them at least at a minimum "requested" frequency
- cap low priority tasks not directly affecting the user experience
by running them only up to a maximum "allowed" frequency
These constraints are meant to support a per-task based tuning of the
frequency selection thus supporting a fine grained definition of
performance boosting vs energy saving strategies in kernel space.
Add support to clamp the utilization of RUNNABLE FAIR and RT tasks
within the boundaries defined by their aggregated utilization clamp
constraints.
Do that by considering the max(min_util, max_util) to give boosted tasks
the performance they need even when they happen to be co-scheduled with
other capped tasks.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-10-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Utilization clamping allows to clamp the CPU's utilization within a
[util_min, util_max] range, depending on the set of RUNNABLE tasks on
that CPU. Each task references two "clamp buckets" defining its minimum
and maximum (util_{min,max}) utilization "clamp values". A CPU's clamp
bucket is active if there is at least one RUNNABLE tasks enqueued on
that CPU and refcounting that bucket.
When a task is {en,de}queued {on,from} a rq, the set of active clamp
buckets on that CPU can change. If the set of active clamp buckets
changes for a CPU a new "aggregated" clamp value is computed for that
CPU. This is because each clamp bucket enforces a different utilization
clamp value.
Clamp values are always MAX aggregated for both util_min and util_max.
This ensures that no task can affect the performance of other
co-scheduled tasks which are more boosted (i.e. with higher util_min
clamp) or less capped (i.e. with higher util_max clamp).
A task has:
task_struct::uclamp[clamp_id]::bucket_id
to track the "bucket index" of the CPU's clamp bucket it refcounts while
enqueued, for each clamp index (clamp_id).
A runqueue has:
rq::uclamp[clamp_id]::bucket[bucket_id].tasks
to track how many RUNNABLE tasks on that CPU refcount each
clamp bucket (bucket_id) of a clamp index (clamp_id).
It also has a:
rq::uclamp[clamp_id]::bucket[bucket_id].value
to track the clamp value of each clamp bucket (bucket_id) of a clamp
index (clamp_id).
The rq::uclamp::bucket[clamp_id][] array is scanned every time it's
needed to find a new MAX aggregated clamp value for a clamp_id. This
operation is required only when it's dequeued the last task of a clamp
bucket tracking the current MAX aggregated clamp value. In this case,
the CPU is either entering IDLE or going to schedule a less boosted or
more clamped task.
The expected number of different clamp values configured at build time
is small enough to fit the full unordered array into a single cache
line, for configurations of up to 7 buckets.
Add to struct rq the basic data structures required to refcount the
number of RUNNABLE tasks for each clamp bucket. Add also the max
aggregation required to update the rq's clamp value at each
enqueue/dequeue event.
Use a simple linear mapping of clamp values into clamp buckets.
Pre-compute and cache bucket_id to avoid integer divisions at
enqueue/dequeue time.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alessio Balsini <balsini@android.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621084217.8167-2-patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
When a cfs_rq sleeps and returns its quota, we delay for 5ms before
waking any throttled cfs_rqs to coalesce with other cfs_rqs going to
sleep, as this has to be done outside of the rq lock we hold.
The current code waits for 5ms without any sleeps, instead of waiting
for 5ms from the first sleep, which can delay the unthrottle more than
we want. Switch this around so that we can't push this forward forever.
This requires an extra flag rather than using hrtimer_active, since we
need to start a new timer if the current one is in the process of
finishing.
Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Acked-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/xm26a7euy6iq.fsf_-_@bsegall-linux.svl.corp.google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
