With commit e948bc8fbe (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay
value to 10 ms) the cpufreq was not honouring the delay passed via
ACPI (PCCT). Due to which on ARM based platforms using CPPC the
cpufreq governor tries to change the frequency of CPUs faster than
expected.
This leads to continuous error messages like the following.
" ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 "
Earlier (without above commit) the default transition delay was
taken form the value passed from PCCT. Use the same value provided
by PCCT to set the transition_delay_us.
Fixes: e948bc8fbe (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms)
Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com>
Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cris architecture is getting removed, including the artpec3
and etraxfs SoCs, so these cpufreq drivers are now unused.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from tegra186 driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from speedstep driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from sparc driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from sh-cpufreq driver.
The driver though prints the min/max frequency values and the same is
done from the ->ready() callback now to keep the behavior unchanged.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from sfi driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from scpi driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from sc520 driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from s3c24xx driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from qoirq driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from pxa driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from ppc_cbe driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from powernow driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from p4-clockmod driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from mediatek driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from longhaul driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from ia64-acpi driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from elanfreq driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from e_powersaver driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from cpufreq-dt driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from brcmstb driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from arm_big_little driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table in the acpi-cpufreq driver.
The driver needs to crosscheck if the max frequency corresponds to the
P-state 0 or not and the same is done from the ->ready() callback now.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq table is already validated by the cpufreq core and none of
the users of cpufreq_generic_init() have any dependency on it to
validate the table as well.
Don't validate the cpufreq table anymore from cpufreq_generic_init().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This is a preparatory commit to make policy->suspend_freq independent of
validation of the cpufreq table, as a later commit would update
cpufreq_generic_init() to not validate the cpufreq table any longer.
The driver already assumes the order in which the frequency table is
sorted and we can get the max frequency easily.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
A built-in scpi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular
thermal framework:
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_ready':
scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x4c): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.o: In function `scpi_cpufreq_exit':
scpi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'
This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration
is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work.
Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the
THERMAL dependency.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.
Stop validating the frequency table from powernv driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
A built-in scmi cpufreq driver cannot link against a modular
thermal framework:
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.o: In function `scmi_cpufreq_ready':
scmi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `of_cpufreq_cooling_register'
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.o: In function `scmi_cpufreq_exit':
scmi-cpufreq.c:(.text+0x88): undefined reference to `cpufreq_cooling_unregister'
This adds a Kconfig dependency that makes sure this configuration
is not possible, while allowing all configurations that can work.
Note that disabling CPU_THERMAL means we don't care about the
THERMAL dependency.
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Pull "ARM SCMI support for v4.17" from Sudeep Holla:
ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI)[1] is more flexible and
easily extensible than any of the existing interfaces.
Few existing as well as future ARM platforms provide micro-controllers
to abstract various power and other system management tasks which have
similar interfaces, both in terms of the functions that are provided by
them, and in terms of how requests are communicated to them.
There are quite a few protocols like ARM SCPI, TI SCI, QCOM RPM, Nvidia Tegra
BPMP, and so on already. This specification is to standardize and avoid any
further fragmentation in the design of such interface by various vendors.
The current SCMI driver implementation is very basic and initial support.
It lacks support for notifications, asynchronous/delayed response, perf/power
statistics region and sensor register region.
Mailbox is the only form of transport supported currently in the driver.
SCMI supports interrupt based mailbox communication, where, on completion
of the processing of a message, the caller receives an interrupt as well as
polling for completion.
SCMI is designed to minimize the dependency on the mailbox/transport
hardware. So in terms of SCMI, each channel in the mailbox includes
memory area, doorbell and completion interrupt.
However the doorbell and completion interrupt is highly mailbox dependent
which was bit of controversial as part of SCMI/mailbox discussions.
Arnd and me discussed about the few aspects of SCMI and the mailbox framework:
1. Use of mailbox framework for doorbell type mailbox controller:
- Such hardware may not require any data to be sent to signal the remote
about the presence of a message. The channel will have in-built
information on how to trigger the signal to the remote.
There are few mailbox controller drivers which are purely doorbell based.
e.g.QCOM IPC, STM, Tegra, ACPI PCC,..etc
2. Supporting other mailbox controller:
- SCMI just needs a mechanism to signal the remote firmware. Such
controller may need fixed message to be sent to trigger a doorbell.
In such case we may need to get that data from DT and pass the same
to the controller. It's not covered in the current DT binding, but
can be extended as optional property in future.
However handling notifications may be interesting on such mailbox, but
again there is no way to interpret what the data field(remote message)
means, it could be a bit mask or a number or don't-care.
Arnd mentioned that he doesn't like the way the mailbox binding deals
with doorbell-type hardware, but we do have quite a few precedent drivers
already and changing the binding to add a data field would not make it any
better, but could cause other problems. So he is happy with the status quo
of SCMI implementation.
[1] http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.den0056a/index.html
* tag 'scmi-updates-4.17' of ssh://gitolite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sudeep.holla/linux:
cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching
cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol
hwmon: add support for sensors exported via ARM SCMI
hwmon: (core) Add hwmon_max to hwmon_sensor_types enumeration
clk: add support for clocks provided by SCMI
firmware: arm_scmi: add device power domain support using genpd
firmware: arm_scmi: add per-protocol channels support using idr objects
firmware: arm_scmi: refactor in preparation to support per-protocol channels
firmware: arm_scmi: add option for polling based performance domain operations
firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers
firmware: arm_scmi: probe and initialise all the supported protocols
firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for sensor protocol
firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for power protocol
firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol
firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol
firmware: arm_scmi: add scmi protocol bus to enumerate protocol devices
firmware: arm_scmi: add common infrastructure and support for base protocol
firmware: arm_scmi: add basic driver infrastructure for SCMI
dt-bindings: arm: add support for ARM System Control and Management Interface(SCMI) protocol
dt-bindings: mailbox: add support for mailbox client shared memory
The cpufreq core provides option for drivers to implement fast_switch
callback which is invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context.
This patch adds support for fast_switch callback in SCMI cpufreq driver
by making use of polling based SCMI transfer. It also sets the flag
fast_switch_possible.
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On some ARM based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control
Processor(SCP) provides the overall power, clock, reset and system
control including CPU DVFS. SCMI Message Protocol is used to
communicate with the SCP.
This patch adds a cpufreq driver for such systems using SCMI interface
to drive CPU DVFS.
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
Thus remove such a statement in the affected functions.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
There are two clusters (2 + 4 CPUs) on this platform and a separate
cpufreq policy is available for each of the CPUs. The loop in
tegra186_cpufreq_init() tries to find the structure for the right CPU
and finish initialization. But it is missing a `break` statement at the
end, which forces it to restart the loop even when the CPU already
matched and initialization is done.
Fix that by adding the missing `break` statement.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
By design, cpufreq drivers are responsible for calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() from their ->init()
callbacks to validate the frequency table.
However, if a cpufreq driver is buggy and fails to do so properly, it
lead to unexpected behavior of the driver or the cpufreq core at a
later point in time. It would be better if the core could
validate the frequency table during driver initialization.
To that end, introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() and make
the cpufreq core call it right after invoking the ->init() callback
of the driver and destroy the cpufreq policy if the table is invalid.
For the time being the validation of the table happens twice, once
from the driver and then from the core. The individual drivers will
be updated separately to drop table validation if they don't need it
for other reasons.
The frequency table is marked "sorted" or "unsorted" by the new helper
now instead of in cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), as it should only
be done after validating the table (which the drivers won't do going
forward).
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Ideally the de-allocation of resources should happen in the exact
opposite order in which they were allocated. It helps maintain the code
in long term, even if nothing really breaks with incorrect ordering.
That wasn't followed in cpufreq_online() and it has some
inconsistencies. For example, the symlinks were created from within
the locked region while they are removed only after putting the locks.
Also ->exit() should have been called only after the symlinks are
removed and the lock is dropped, as that was the case when ->init()
was first called.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With multi-platform build images, this shows a message on non mediatek
platforms, which is unnecessary. Convert pr_warn() to pr_debug() here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
commit a307a1e6bc "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()"
accidentally broke cpufreq on s3c2410 and s3c2412.
These two platforms don't have a CPU frequency table and used to skip
calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() for them. But with the
above commit, we started calling it unconditionally and that will
eventually fail as the frequency table pointer is NULL.
Fix this by calling cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() conditionally
again.
Fixes: a307a1e6bc "cpufreq: s3c: use cpufreq_generic_init()"
Cc: 3.13+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13+
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
changed the cpufreq driver on juno from arm_big_little to scpi.
The scpi set_target function does not call the frequency-invariance
setter function arch_set_freq_scale() like the arm_big_little set_target
function does. As a result the task scheduler load and utilization
signals are not frequency-invariant on this platform anymore.
Fix this by adding a call to arch_set_freq_scale() into
scpi_cpufreq_set_target().
Fixes: 343a8d17fa (cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency)
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Pull x86 PTI and Spectre related fixes and updates from Ingo Molnar:
"Here's the latest set of Spectre and PTI related fixes and updates:
Spectre:
- Add entry code register clearing to reduce the Spectre attack
surface
- Update the Spectre microcode blacklist
- Inline the KVM Spectre helpers to get close to v4.14 performance
again.
- Fix indirect_branch_prediction_barrier()
- Fix/improve Spectre related kernel messages
- Fix array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint
- KVM: fix two MSR handling bugs
PTI:
- Fix a paranoid entry PTI CR3 handling bug
- Fix comments
objtool:
- Fix paranoid_entry() frame pointer warning
- Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable
- Various fixes
- Add Add Peter Zijlstra as objtool co-maintainer
Misc:
- Various x86 entry code self-test fixes
- Improve/simplify entry code stack frame generation and handling
after recent heavy-handed PTI and Spectre changes. (There's two
more WIP improvements expected here.)
- Type fix for cache entries
There's also some low risk non-fix changes I've included in this
branch to reduce backporting conflicts:
- rename a confusing x86_cpu field name
- de-obfuscate the naming of single-TLB flushing primitives"
* 'x86-pti-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (41 commits)
x86/entry/64: Fix CR3 restore in paranoid_exit()
x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned int
x86/spectre: Fix an error message
x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping
selftests/x86/mpx: Fix incorrect bounds with old _sigfault
x86/mm: Rename flush_tlb_single() and flush_tlb_one() to __flush_tlb_one_[user|kernel]()
x86/speculation: Add <asm/msr-index.h> dependency
nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro
x86/speculation: Fix up array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint
x86/debug: Use UD2 for WARN()
x86/debug, objtool: Annotate WARN()-related UD2 as reachable
objtool: Fix segfault in ignore_unreachable_insn()
selftests/x86: Disable tests requiring 32-bit support on pure 64-bit systems
selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in single_step_syscall.c
selftests/x86: Do not rely on "int $0x80" in test_mremap_vdso.c
selftests/x86: Fix build bug caused by the 5lvl test which has been moved to the VM directory
selftests/x86/pkeys: Remove unused functions
selftests/x86: Clean up and document sscanf() usage
selftests/x86: Fix vDSO selftest segfault for vsyscall=none
x86/entry/64: Remove the unused 'icebp' macro
...
Without this, the imx6q-cpufreq driver isn't loaded
automatically when built as a module
Tested on wandboard quad with a fedora 27 kernel rpm
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
