isci: unify isci_port and scic_sds_port
Remove the distinction between these two implementations and unify on isci_port (local instances named iport). The duplicate '->owning_port' and '->isci_port' in both isci_phy and isci_remote_device will be fixed in a later patch... this is just the straightforward rename/unification. Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ done:
|
||||
* port (i.e. it's contained in the dummy port). !NULL All other
|
||||
* values indicate a handle/pointer to the port containing the phy.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct scic_sds_port *phy_get_non_dummy_port(
|
||||
struct isci_port *phy_get_non_dummy_port(
|
||||
struct isci_phy *iphy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (scic_sds_port_get_index(iphy->owning_port) == SCIC_SDS_DUMMY_PORT)
|
||||
@@ -304,9 +304,9 @@ struct scic_sds_port *phy_get_non_dummy_port(
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void scic_sds_phy_set_port(
|
||||
struct isci_phy *iphy,
|
||||
struct scic_sds_port *sci_port)
|
||||
struct isci_port *iport)
|
||||
{
|
||||
iphy->owning_port = sci_port;
|
||||
iphy->owning_port = iport;
|
||||
|
||||
if (iphy->bcn_received_while_port_unassigned) {
|
||||
iphy->bcn_received_while_port_unassigned = false;
|
||||
@@ -1291,12 +1291,12 @@ static const struct sci_base_state scic_sds_phy_state_table[] = {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void scic_sds_phy_construct(struct isci_phy *iphy,
|
||||
struct scic_sds_port *owning_port, u8 phy_index)
|
||||
struct isci_port *iport, u8 phy_index)
|
||||
{
|
||||
sci_init_sm(&iphy->sm, scic_sds_phy_state_table, SCI_PHY_INITIAL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Copy the rest of the input data to our locals */
|
||||
iphy->owning_port = owning_port;
|
||||
iphy->owning_port = iport;
|
||||
iphy->phy_index = phy_index;
|
||||
iphy->bcn_received_while_port_unassigned = false;
|
||||
iphy->protocol = SCIC_SDS_PHY_PROTOCOL_UNKNOWN;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user