docs: driver-model: move it to the driver-api book
The audience for the Kernel driver-model is clearly Kernel hackers. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> # ice driver changes
This commit is contained in:
124
Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/overview.rst
Normal file
124
Documentation/driver-api/driver-model/overview.rst
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
|
||||
=============================
|
||||
The Linux Kernel Device Model
|
||||
=============================
|
||||
|
||||
Patrick Mochel <mochel@digitalimplant.org>
|
||||
|
||||
Drafted 26 August 2002
|
||||
Updated 31 January 2006
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Overview
|
||||
~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
The Linux Kernel Driver Model is a unification of all the disparate driver
|
||||
models that were previously used in the kernel. It is intended to augment the
|
||||
bus-specific drivers for bridges and devices by consolidating a set of data
|
||||
and operations into globally accessible data structures.
|
||||
|
||||
Traditional driver models implemented some sort of tree-like structure
|
||||
(sometimes just a list) for the devices they control. There wasn't any
|
||||
uniformity across the different bus types.
|
||||
|
||||
The current driver model provides a common, uniform data model for describing
|
||||
a bus and the devices that can appear under the bus. The unified bus
|
||||
model includes a set of common attributes which all busses carry, and a set
|
||||
of common callbacks, such as device discovery during bus probing, bus
|
||||
shutdown, bus power management, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
The common device and bridge interface reflects the goals of the modern
|
||||
computer: namely the ability to do seamless device "plug and play", power
|
||||
management, and hot plug. In particular, the model dictated by Intel and
|
||||
Microsoft (namely ACPI) ensures that almost every device on almost any bus
|
||||
on an x86-compatible system can work within this paradigm. Of course,
|
||||
not every bus is able to support all such operations, although most
|
||||
buses support most of those operations.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Downstream Access
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
Common data fields have been moved out of individual bus layers into a common
|
||||
data structure. These fields must still be accessed by the bus layers,
|
||||
and sometimes by the device-specific drivers.
|
||||
|
||||
Other bus layers are encouraged to do what has been done for the PCI layer.
|
||||
struct pci_dev now looks like this::
|
||||
|
||||
struct pci_dev {
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
struct device dev; /* Generic device interface */
|
||||
...
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Note first that the struct device dev within the struct pci_dev is
|
||||
statically allocated. This means only one allocation on device discovery.
|
||||
|
||||
Note also that that struct device dev is not necessarily defined at the
|
||||
front of the pci_dev structure. This is to make people think about what
|
||||
they're doing when switching between the bus driver and the global driver,
|
||||
and to discourage meaningless and incorrect casts between the two.
|
||||
|
||||
The PCI bus layer freely accesses the fields of struct device. It knows about
|
||||
the structure of struct pci_dev, and it should know the structure of struct
|
||||
device. Individual PCI device drivers that have been converted to the current
|
||||
driver model generally do not and should not touch the fields of struct device,
|
||||
unless there is a compelling reason to do so.
|
||||
|
||||
The above abstraction prevents unnecessary pain during transitional phases.
|
||||
If it were not done this way, then when a field was renamed or removed, every
|
||||
downstream driver would break. On the other hand, if only the bus layer
|
||||
(and not the device layer) accesses the struct device, it is only the bus
|
||||
layer that needs to change.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
User Interface
|
||||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||
|
||||
By virtue of having a complete hierarchical view of all the devices in the
|
||||
system, exporting a complete hierarchical view to userspace becomes relatively
|
||||
easy. This has been accomplished by implementing a special purpose virtual
|
||||
file system named sysfs.
|
||||
|
||||
Almost all mainstream Linux distros mount this filesystem automatically; you
|
||||
can see some variation of the following in the output of the "mount" command::
|
||||
|
||||
$ mount
|
||||
...
|
||||
none on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev)
|
||||
...
|
||||
$
|
||||
|
||||
The auto-mounting of sysfs is typically accomplished by an entry similar to
|
||||
the following in the /etc/fstab file::
|
||||
|
||||
none /sys sysfs defaults 0 0
|
||||
|
||||
or something similar in the /lib/init/fstab file on Debian-based systems::
|
||||
|
||||
none /sys sysfs nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
|
||||
|
||||
If sysfs is not automatically mounted, you can always do it manually with::
|
||||
|
||||
# mount -t sysfs sysfs /sys
|
||||
|
||||
Whenever a device is inserted into the tree, a directory is created for it.
|
||||
This directory may be populated at each layer of discovery - the global layer,
|
||||
the bus layer, or the device layer.
|
||||
|
||||
The global layer currently creates two files - 'name' and 'power'. The
|
||||
former only reports the name of the device. The latter reports the
|
||||
current power state of the device. It will also be used to set the current
|
||||
power state.
|
||||
|
||||
The bus layer may also create files for the devices it finds while probing the
|
||||
bus. For example, the PCI layer currently creates 'irq' and 'resource' files
|
||||
for each PCI device.
|
||||
|
||||
A device-specific driver may also export files in its directory to expose
|
||||
device-specific data or tunable interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
More information about the sysfs directory layout can be found in
|
||||
the other documents in this directory and in the file
|
||||
Documentation/filesystems/sysfs.txt.
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user