[media] em28xx: checkpatch cleanup: whitespaces/new lines cleanups
This patch is basically produced while testing a tool that Joe Perches sent upstream sometime ago: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/11/794 I used it with those arguments: $ reformat_with_checkpatch.sh drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx*.[ch] It actually produced 24 patches, with is too much, and showed interesting things: gcc produced different codes on most of the patches, even with just linespace changes. The total code data remained the same on all cases I checked though. Anyway, provided that we fold the resulting patches, this tool seems useful. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ static inline unsigned long em28xx_hash_mem(char *buf, int length, int bits)
|
||||
unsigned long l = 0;
|
||||
int len = 0;
|
||||
unsigned char c;
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
if (len == length) {
|
||||
c = (char)len;
|
||||
@@ -950,7 +951,7 @@ int em28xx_i2c_register(struct em28xx *dev, unsigned bus,
|
||||
retval = i2c_add_adapter(&dev->i2c_adap[bus]);
|
||||
if (retval < 0) {
|
||||
em28xx_errdev("%s: i2c_add_adapter failed! retval [%d]\n",
|
||||
__func__, retval);
|
||||
__func__, retval);
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -962,7 +963,7 @@ int em28xx_i2c_register(struct em28xx *dev, unsigned bus,
|
||||
retval = em28xx_i2c_eeprom(dev, bus, &dev->eedata, &dev->eedata_len);
|
||||
if ((retval < 0) && (retval != -ENODEV)) {
|
||||
em28xx_errdev("%s: em28xx_i2_eeprom failed! retval [%d]\n",
|
||||
__func__, retval);
|
||||
__func__, retval);
|
||||
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user