[media] em28xx: checkpatch cleanup: whitespaces/new lines cleanups

This patch is basically produced while testing a tool that
Joe Perches sent upstream sometime ago:
	https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/11/794

I used it with those arguments:
	$ reformat_with_checkpatch.sh drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx*.[ch]

It actually produced 24 patches, with is too much, and showed
interesting things: gcc produced different codes on most of the
patches, even with just linespace changes. The total code data
remained the same on all cases I checked though.

Anyway, provided that we fold the resulting patches, this tool
seems useful.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-11-28 08:34:15 -03:00
parent 1b97dc98b5
commit fdf1bc9fa2
12 changed files with 134 additions and 136 deletions

View File

@@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ static inline unsigned long em28xx_hash_mem(char *buf, int length, int bits)
unsigned long l = 0;
int len = 0;
unsigned char c;
do {
if (len == length) {
c = (char)len;
@@ -950,7 +951,7 @@ int em28xx_i2c_register(struct em28xx *dev, unsigned bus,
retval = i2c_add_adapter(&dev->i2c_adap[bus]);
if (retval < 0) {
em28xx_errdev("%s: i2c_add_adapter failed! retval [%d]\n",
__func__, retval);
__func__, retval);
return retval;
}
@@ -962,7 +963,7 @@ int em28xx_i2c_register(struct em28xx *dev, unsigned bus,
retval = em28xx_i2c_eeprom(dev, bus, &dev->eedata, &dev->eedata_len);
if ((retval < 0) && (retval != -ENODEV)) {
em28xx_errdev("%s: em28xx_i2_eeprom failed! retval [%d]\n",
__func__, retval);
__func__, retval);
return retval;
}