xiaomi-sm8450/android_kernel_xiaomi_sm8450
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

locking: Convert raw_rwlock to arch_rwlock

Browse Source 
Not strictly necessary for -rt as -rt does not have non sleeping
rwlocks, but it's odd to not have a consistent naming convention.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Gleixner
2009-12-03 20:01:19 +01:00
parent 0199c4e68d
commit fb3a6bbc91
32 changed files with 150 additions and 150 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h
View File

@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *x)
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
static __inline__ void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ void __raw_read_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static __inline__ void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
static __inline__ void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ void __raw_read_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static __inline__ void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
static __inline__ int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ int __raw_read_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
retry:
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static __inline__ int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to read_trylock() this lock */
static __inline__ void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ void __raw_write_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
retry:
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ retry:
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
static __inline__ void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ void __raw_write_unlock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
rw->counter = 0;
arch_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static __inline__ void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to read_trylock() this lock */
static __inline__ int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ int __raw_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
int result = 0;
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static __inline__ int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
* read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed?
* @lock: the rwlock in question.
*/
static __inline__ int __raw_read_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ int __raw_read_can_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
return rw->counter >= 0;
}
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static __inline__ int __raw_read_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
* write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed?
* @lock: the rwlock in question.
*/
static __inline__ int __raw_write_can_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
static __inline__ int __raw_write_can_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw)
{
return !rw->counter;
}