perf evlist: Introduce poll method for common code idiom

Since we have access two evlist members in all these poll calls, provide
a helper.

This will also help to make the patch introducing the pollfd class more
clear, as the evlist specific uses will be hiden away
perf_evlist__poll().

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-jr9d4aop4lvy9453qahbcgp0@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

tools/perf/builtin-record.c

@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
 		if (hits == rec->samples) {
 			if (done)
 				break;
-			err = poll(rec->evlist->pollfd, rec->evlist->nr_fds, -1);
+			err = perf_evlist__poll(rec->evlist, -1);
 			/*
 			 * Propagate error, only if there's any. Ignore positive
 			 * number of returned events and interrupt error.