Merge branch 'k.o/for-rc' into k.o/wip/dl-for-next

Several items of conflict have arisen between the RDMA stack's for-rc
branch and upcoming for-next work:

9fd4350ba8 ("IB/rxe: avoid double kfree_skb") directly conflicts with
2e47350789 ("IB/rxe: optimize the function duplicate_request")

Patches already submitted by Intel for the hfi1 driver will fail to
apply cleanly without this merge

Other people on the mailing list have notified that their upcoming
patches also fail to apply cleanly without this merge

Signed-off-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>

drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c

@@ -260,7 +260,11 @@ static int set_rq_size(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct ib_qp_cap *cap,
 	} else {
 		if (ucmd) {
 			qp->rq.wqe_cnt = ucmd->rq_wqe_count;
+			if (ucmd->rq_wqe_shift > BITS_PER_BYTE * sizeof(ucmd->rq_wqe_shift))
+				return -EINVAL;
 			qp->rq.wqe_shift = ucmd->rq_wqe_shift;
+			if ((1 << qp->rq.wqe_shift) / sizeof(struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg) < qp->wq_sig)
+				return -EINVAL;
 			qp->rq.max_gs = (1 << qp->rq.wqe_shift) / sizeof(struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg) - qp->wq_sig;
 			qp->rq.max_post = qp->rq.wqe_cnt;
 		} else {
@@ -2454,18 +2458,18 @@ enum {
 
 static int ib_rate_to_mlx5(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u8 rate)
 {
-	if (rate == IB_RATE_PORT_CURRENT) {
+	if (rate == IB_RATE_PORT_CURRENT)
 		return 0;
-	} else if (rate < IB_RATE_2_5_GBPS || rate > IB_RATE_300_GBPS) {
-		return -EINVAL;
-	} else {
-		while (rate != IB_RATE_2_5_GBPS &&
-		       !(1 << (rate + MLX5_STAT_RATE_OFFSET) &
-			 MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, stat_rate_support)))
-			--rate;
-	}
 
-	return rate + MLX5_STAT_RATE_OFFSET;
+	if (rate < IB_RATE_2_5_GBPS || rate > IB_RATE_300_GBPS)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	while (rate != IB_RATE_PORT_CURRENT &&
+	       !(1 << (rate + MLX5_STAT_RATE_OFFSET) &
+		 MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev->mdev, stat_rate_support)))
+		--rate;
+
+	return rate ? rate + MLX5_STAT_RATE_OFFSET : rate;
 }
 
 static int modify_raw_packet_eth_prio(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev,