Merge branch 'for-3.14/core' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block
Pull core block IO changes from Jens Axboe: "The major piece in here is the immutable bio_ve series from Kent, the rest is fairly minor. It was supposed to go in last round, but various issues pushed it to this release instead. The pull request contains: - Various smaller blk-mq fixes from different folks. Nothing major here, just minor fixes and cleanups. - Fix for a memory leak in the error path in the block ioctl code from Christian Engelmayer. - Header export fix from CaiZhiyong. - Finally the immutable biovec changes from Kent Overstreet. This enables some nice future work on making arbitrarily sized bios possible, and splitting more efficient. Related fixes to immutable bio_vecs: - dm-cache immutable fixup from Mike Snitzer. - btrfs immutable fixup from Muthu Kumar. - bio-integrity fix from Nic Bellinger, which is also going to stable" * 'for-3.14/core' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: (44 commits) xtensa: fixup simdisk driver to work with immutable bio_vecs block/blk-mq-cpu.c: use hotcpu_notifier() blk-mq: for_each_* macro correctness block: Fix memory leak in rw_copy_check_uvector() handling bio-integrity: Fix bio_integrity_verify segment start bug block: remove unrelated header files and export symbol blk-mq: uses page->list incorrectly blk-mq: use __smp_call_function_single directly btrfs: fix missing increment of bi_remaining Revert "block: Warn and free bio if bi_end_io is not set" block: Warn and free bio if bi_end_io is not set blk-mq: fix initializing request's start time block: blk-mq: don't export blk_mq_free_queue() block: blk-mq: make blk_sync_queue support mq block: blk-mq: support draining mq queue dm cache: increment bi_remaining when bi_end_io is restored block: fixup for generic bio chaining block: Really silence spurious compiler warnings block: Silence spurious compiler warnings block: Kill bio_pair_split() ...
此提交包含在:
@@ -2235,10 +2235,10 @@ static int mptsas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* do we need to support multiple segments? */
|
||||
if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1 || bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
|
||||
printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT "%s: multiple segments req %u %u, rsp %u %u\n",
|
||||
ioc->name, __func__, bio_segments(req->bio), blk_rq_bytes(req),
|
||||
bio_segments(rsp->bio), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
|
||||
if (bio_multiple_segments(req->bio) ||
|
||||
bio_multiple_segments(rsp->bio)) {
|
||||
printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT "%s: multiple segments req %u, rsp %u\n",
|
||||
ioc->name, __func__, blk_rq_bytes(req), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
新增問題並參考
封鎖使用者