[PATCH] ext4 64 bit divide fix
With CONFIG_LBD=n, sector_div() expands to a plain old divide. But ext4 is _not_ passing in a sector_t as the first argument, so... fs/built-in.o: In function `ext4_get_group_no_and_offset': fs/ext4/balloc.c:39: undefined reference to `__umoddi3' fs/ext4/balloc.c:41: undefined reference to `__udivdi3' fs/built-in.o: In function `find_group_orlov': fs/ext4/ialloc.c:278: undefined reference to `__udivdi3' fs/built-in.o: In function `ext4_fill_super': fs/ext4/super.c:1488: undefined reference to `__udivdi3' fs/ext4/super.c:1488: undefined reference to `__umoddi3' fs/ext4/super.c:1594: undefined reference to `__udivdi3' fs/ext4/super.c:1601: undefined reference to `__umoddi3' Fix that up by calling do_div() directly. Also cast the arg to u64. do_div() is only defined on u64, and ext4_fsblk_t is supposed to be opaque. Note especially the changes to find_group_orlov(). It was attempting to do do_div(int, unsigned long long); which is royally screwed up. Switched it to plain old divide. Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:

committed by
Linus Torvalds

parent
72b64b5940
commit
f4e5bc244f
@@ -1485,7 +1485,7 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (blocksize != EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE) {
|
||||
logic_sb_block = sb_block * EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE;
|
||||
offset = sector_div(logic_sb_block, blocksize);
|
||||
offset = do_div(logic_sb_block, blocksize);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
logic_sb_block = sb_block;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1591,7 +1591,7 @@ static int ext4_fill_super (struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
|
||||
brelse (bh);
|
||||
sb_set_blocksize(sb, blocksize);
|
||||
logic_sb_block = sb_block * EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_SIZE;
|
||||
offset = sector_div(logic_sb_block, blocksize);
|
||||
offset = do_div(logic_sb_block, blocksize);
|
||||
bh = sb_bread(sb, logic_sb_block);
|
||||
if (!bh) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user